http://nofilmschool.com/2006/02/we-three-kongs-part-1-1933/ NoFilmSchool is a site for DIY filmmakers and independent creatives. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:33:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://nofilmschool.com/2006/02/we-three-kongs-part-1-1933/comment-page-1/#comment-189 No Film School » We Three Kongs, Part 3 (2005) Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:00:46 +0000 http://nofilmschool.com/2006/02/we-three-kongs-part-1-1933/#comment-189 [...] At long last, the not-at-all-anticipated part three of my Kongparison, wherein I jot down notes from watching each of the three Kongs (here are parts one and two). [...] [...] At long last, the not-at-all-anticipated part three of my Kongparison, wherein I jot down notes from watching each of the three Kongs (here are parts one and two). [...]

]]> http://nofilmschool.com/2006/02/we-three-kongs-part-1-1933/comment-page-1/#comment-154 No Film School » We Three Kongs, part 2 (1976) Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:20:38 +0000 http://nofilmschool.com/2006/02/we-three-kongs-part-1-1933/#comment-154 [...] Here is the second installment of my three-part King Kong comparison. The ‘76 film is by far the worst of the three, and this post will likely follow suit. The first entry is here, and the third is here (that link will work once the third entry is posted, if I do this right). King Kong (1976), dir. John Guillermin (tellingly produced by Dino De Laurentiis) [...] [...] Here is the second installment of my three-part King Kong comparison. The ‘76 film is by far the worst of the three, and this post will likely follow suit. The first entry is here, and the third is here (that link will work once the third entry is posted, if I do this right). King Kong (1976), dir. John Guillermin (tellingly produced by Dino De Laurentiis) [...]

]]>