<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We interrupt your regularly-scheduled self-promotion to bring you this special self-promotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/</link>
	<description>NoFilmSchool is a site for DIY filmmakers and independent creatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple&#8217;s Subscription Service, Google&#8217;s One Pass, and What it All Could Mean for Independent Content Creators &#124; NoFilmSchool</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-70606</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple&#8217;s Subscription Service, Google&#8217;s One Pass, and What it All Could Mean for Independent Content Creators &#124; NoFilmSchool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-70606</guid>
		<description>[...] come a long way since AOL bought Weblogs, Inc. (who I was writing for at the time, until DVguru was axed) for $25 million. By most accounts that acquisition has gone well for AOL, and at this point in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come a long way since AOL bought Weblogs, Inc. (who I was writing for at the time, until DVguru was axed) for $25 million. By most accounts that acquisition has gone well for AOL, and at this point in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can a blog be self-sustaining? NoFilmSchool&#8217;s traffic and revenue &#171; NoFilmSchool</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-64364</link>
		<dc:creator>Can a blog be self-sustaining? NoFilmSchool&#8217;s traffic and revenue &#171; NoFilmSchool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-64364</guid>
		<description>[...] blog, wherein you&#8217;re one of many staff writers churning out content every day &#8212; which I&#8217;ve done &#8212; but can you turn a profit by writing about what&#8217;s important to you, on your own site, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog, wherein you&#8217;re one of many staff writers churning out content every day &#8212; which I&#8217;ve done &#8212; but can you turn a profit by writing about what&#8217;s important to you, on your own site, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Oakhurst</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-18564</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Oakhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-18564</guid>
		<description>Fucking hilarious Ryan.  How is the show coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fucking hilarious Ryan.  How is the show coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editblog</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-16842</link>
		<dc:creator>editblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 03:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-16842</guid>
		<description>Nice post. It&#039;s good to get a little more information on the demise of our favorite blog. I think it goes to show (and looking at the weblogs Inc.&#039;s &quot;on hiatus/retired&quot; blogs) you can see that these narrow market blogs must not generate enough revenue for a corporate giant. It&#039;s a shame as you can see that many of them have a lot of readers. I wonder if a savvy business person could start a string of these niche blogs and make the profitable. Or is that what Weblogs Inc. used to do? Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. It&#8217;s good to get a little more information on the demise of our favorite blog. I think it goes to show (and looking at the weblogs Inc.&#8217;s &#8220;on hiatus/retired&#8221; blogs) you can see that these narrow market blogs must not generate enough revenue for a corporate giant. It&#8217;s a shame as you can see that many of them have a lot of readers. I wonder if a savvy business person could start a string of these niche blogs and make the profitable. Or is that what Weblogs Inc. used to do? Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Heimlich</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-16554</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Heimlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-16554</guid>
		<description>You can thank Randall for posting the DVD Rewinder to Digg, I thought it was a rather cheesy story to go big with.  nonetheless, the blogosphere thought otherwise.  

Our traffic was certainly booming when they pulled the plug but I think they were forced to make a decision for the betterment of  their bigger blogs.  It&#039;s a shame they didn&#039;t keep us going past NAB, we could&#039;ve really shined then.

I was really worried when Jason Calacanis wanted to see 1 million page views a month.  It makes sense for a broad topic like gadgets and cars, but how many people are there in the world interested in Digital Video?  I guess hyperniche markets aren&#039;t all they are cracked up to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can thank Randall for posting the DVD Rewinder to Digg, I thought it was a rather cheesy story to go big with.  nonetheless, the blogosphere thought otherwise.  </p>
<p>Our traffic was certainly booming when they pulled the plug but I think they were forced to make a decision for the betterment of  their bigger blogs.  It&#8217;s a shame they didn&#8217;t keep us going past NAB, we could&#8217;ve really shined then.</p>
<p>I was really worried when Jason Calacanis wanted to see 1 million page views a month.  It makes sense for a broad topic like gadgets and cars, but how many people are there in the world interested in Digital Video?  I guess hyperniche markets aren&#8217;t all they are cracked up to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hill</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/comment-page-1/#comment-16464</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/2007/02/dvguru/#comment-16464</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan -- the decision to retire a blog is much more complicated than you are imagining. Many factors are considered and several teams are involved -- sales, editorial, finance, etc.. Believe me, it&#039;s not just glancing at Sitemeter! Nor is it just, &quot;Hey, YouTube sold for $1.65B,&quot; or, &quot;Om Malik is publishing in this space, so we should be too.&quot; A good decision for one organization can be a bad decision for another organization. We consider everything, and attempts to simplify substantial business decisions are usually ... well, too simple.

Anyway, cute post -- and good luck with your sex tapes venture :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan &#8212; the decision to retire a blog is much more complicated than you are imagining. Many factors are considered and several teams are involved &#8212; sales, editorial, finance, etc.. Believe me, it&#8217;s not just glancing at Sitemeter! Nor is it just, &#8220;Hey, YouTube sold for $1.65B,&#8221; or, &#8220;Om Malik is publishing in this space, so we should be too.&#8221; A good decision for one organization can be a bad decision for another organization. We consider everything, and attempts to simplify substantial business decisions are usually &#8230; well, too simple.</p>
<p>Anyway, cute post &#8212; and good luck with your sex tapes venture :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

