<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lock &amp; Load X a Viable Solution for Reducing Rolling Shutter Artifacts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/</link>
	<description>NoFilmSchool is a site for DIY filmmakers and independent creatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Henderson</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/comment-page-1/#comment-64754</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4311#comment-64754</guid>
		<description>Alright, still not the best video to test it out on, wonder how well it works on a simple fast pan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, still not the best video to test it out on, wonder how well it works on a simple fast pan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/comment-page-1/#comment-64753</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4311#comment-64753</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because I&#039;d used the wrong link! Thanks Stephen, it&#039;s updated with the right URL. As for the video... innovative solution for sure, and certainly applicable if you absolutely must save a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because I&#8217;d used the wrong link! Thanks Stephen, it&#8217;s updated with the right URL. As for the video&#8230; innovative solution for sure, and certainly applicable if you absolutely must save a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Henderson</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/comment-page-1/#comment-64752</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4311#comment-64752</guid>
		<description>I seemed to have missed entirely any rolling shutter test on the demo. Was there one? Seemed to stabilize camera shake, though. This seems to be the best rolling shutter cure I&#039;ve seen: http://vimeo.com/10130633</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seemed to have missed entirely any rolling shutter test on the demo. Was there one? Seemed to stabilize camera shake, though. This seems to be the best rolling shutter cure I&#8217;ve seen: <a href="http://vimeo.com/10130633" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/10130633</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/lock-load-x-a-viable-solution-for-reducing-rolling-shutter-artifacts/comment-page-1/#comment-64751</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4311#comment-64751</guid>
		<description>It looks a bit weird; not flawless at all. What can you expect, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks a bit weird; not flawless at all. What can you expect, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

