November 3, 2011

Canon's Historic Hollywood Announcement is the Canon Cinema EOS C300

We've all been wondering what Canon's video division has been up to since their 5D Mark II HDSLR unwittingly ushered in a low-cost, large sensor video revolution. The answer three years in the making: the Canon Cinema EOS C300. There are two cameras, the C300 and C300PL, which are identical except for the PL lens mount on the latter. Via DV Info, here are the official specs:

  • 8.3 megapixel 2160×3840 Super-35 CMOS sensor (4K resolution) with Digic DV III processor
  • Canon XF codec (50Mbps 4:2:2 1080p MPEG2 MXF) records to two Compact Flash card slots
  • Canon LOG gamma, SDI, compact body, Custom Presets and menus similar to Canon XF series
  • Exposure and focus control are completely manual — there is no automatic exposure or autofocus
  • Sold as a system, including LCD monitor / XLR audio unit, side grip, top handle, and battery charger
  • Headphone jack (first EOS-branded camera to have this, though it's obviously necessary
  • Uses existing BP-955 and BP-975 batteries
  • Lacks dual-link HD-SDI for native 4:4:4 output, though ships with LOG Gamma unlike the Sony F3
  • Available January 2012
  • Price: $20,000

Yes, the sensor's native resolution is 4K but the C300 outputs a maximum of 1080P. More on that here: how the C300's claimed resolution stacks up to other cameras. You can see from the form factor that DSLR accessory manufacturers should be rejoicing, as this camera's going to need the same kind of rig for shoulder-mount shooting. In addition to the new pro technology center in Hollywood, there are a bunch of new lenses on the way too:

  • Canon Zoom Lens CN-E14.5-60mm T2.6 L S (wide zoom, EF version)
  • Canon Zoom Lens CN-E14.5-60mm T2.6 L SP (wide zoom, PL version)
  • Canon Zoom Lens CN-E30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L S (telephoto zoom, EF version)
  • Canon Zoom Lens CN-E30-300mm T2.95-3.7 L SP (telephoto zoom, PL version)
  • Canon Prime Lens CTZ-029 (24mm) (EF)
  • Canon Prime Lens CTZ-030 (50mm) (EF)
  • Canon Prime Lens CTZ-031 (85mm) (EF)

Hit the link below for more details. In the meantime, here's a video from Zacuto, who already has accessories for the C300:

While the camera reportedly pulls in 12 stops of dynamic range, there are questions about its bit depth -- someone said it was only 8-bit, which is confirmed by the PDF spec sheet at the link below -- but even if it were 10-bit, Canon certainly has the RED SCARLET-X, which pretty much wipes the C300 off the map specs-wise, to worry about.

Links:

[image via Wide Open Camera]

Your Comment

41 Comments

Still 60p at 720? Darn it!

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Darius

Camera looks awesome, although WAY out of my budget.

Regardless, I don't understand why it's an extra $3k for the PL mount?

I understand the difference between cost based pricing vs. value-based pricing, but c'mon!

November 3, 2011

0
Reply

darn it i was hoping for the speed of a RED one but i am dying to see the scarlet!!!

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply

Does it really compete with the other options at that price? Somebody tell me

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Max

Even if it was the same price as a 5DMKII I wouldn't buy it. At least the 5D has magic lantern. Was it worth 3 years for 10bit? Too much money

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Julian

The specs given are relatively underwhelming. However, if the dynamic range, low-light performance and image quality are as good as it sounds like they might be I think this might be very competitive.

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
cows

Meh. Not enough features to justify the price tag, IMO. I'll wait for confirmation, but if this is it I'll stick to my plan of upgrading to the xf305 for now and I'll either take the DSLR route or wait couple of years to buy a cine camera.

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

If this camera wants to compete with the f3 the question will be is there a log signal out of the box

November 3, 2011

3
Reply
Ryan Emanuel

I just saw the specs updated since my original message. Not sure exactly what the resolution is?

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

Sensor is spec'd at 4K but the max output is 1080P... strange.

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
avatar
Ryan Koo
Founder
Writer/Director

Koo, http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/the-truth-about-2k-4k-the-future... is good reading. It has to do with how the sensor samples individual colors. It seems Canon has chosen not to let the camera interpolate the full resolution, instead opting for color fidelity and finer line resolution as a tradeoff.

November 3, 2011

-2
Reply
Angelo

I'll give it a subjective chance, Planet5D is saying the noise response in low light looks amazing and filmic in comparison to digital noise.

I'm a little underwhelmed that it's not pushing 60fps at 1080. The fact that it's not 2K doesn't bother me since 1080 holds up very well in theater projection.

I'm also a little baffled as to why the PL variation is $3000 more when PL adapters are a few hundred and even REDs titanium mounts are only around $2000.

Regardless, my next short will probably begin principal before Canon ships so I'll be going for a Red One rental if budget allows.

November 3, 2011

-2
Reply
Angelo

Dang it, post updated with new specs. The line pair spec is promising, makes me feel if I need to upres a master to 2K wouldn't be a problem if a spec called for it.

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Angelo

I think Jim is rolling around on the floor laughing his arse off right now - this is a joke right? 1080p 30 and the only overcrank is 60p at 1280*720??? Are these bozos for real???

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Paul

Will it Blend?

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
truedat

+1

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

No specs have been released yet. DVinfo is bullshit, if Canon didn't say it, it's not ture.

I don't agree with having an EOS name for a camera hyped this hard but it would be absolute suicide if Canon's marketing team called a HOLLYWOOD event to introduce 1080p. They can't be that stupid. Its an intermission now and no specs have been revealed.

This event is getting a bit long winded though...

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Gary

DV Info is not bullshit. Chris has never trotted out anything that wasn't official. You can bet he had an NDA in place up until the minute it was published, but had access to official info ahead of time.

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
avatar
Ryan Koo
Founder
Writer/Director

This strikes me as a really big deal. It's basically thousands cheaper than the S-Log F3... can it record 4K at all or is it just a 4K sensor spitting out HD?

November 3, 2011

1
Reply

The event is not just to launch the camera, it is Canon's foray into the cinema market. As a first effort, this looks to be a fantastic camera - and I'm really excited to have another competitor in the market! Especially as I have a ton of Canon glass :)

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Kinogeist

The longer this whole circus remains 'spec-less' the more likely it is DVinfo is correct with the specs they put up. Hope Im wrong, even 60p at 1080 would be better than this half HD bullshyte!

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Paul

Don’t know how to react – Indie filmmakers were looking for a Video replacement for for the 5d Mark II – this looks like a replace for SOny f3. Looks like the 5d Mark ii, Nikon DSLRs, Fs100 and AF100 camcorders are not affected in any way. Would have really loved a 6k pricepoint camcorder – but 16K is just too much for 1080p camcorder… This camera is not for My kind of budget tight Filmmakers...when there are reasonable alternatives.

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
Jenna Manni

Hey guys, check out that new HDSLR just chillin in the back... http://www.engadget.com/photos/canon-c300-keynote/#4582600

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Austin

Indie filmmakers embarrassed the 5D mark ii for the low Price point and DOF .... Canon should have targeted the Budget Starved Filmmakers looking for Low Light / DOF / 1080p settings - but with 16k Thats a BIG UPSET

November 3, 2011

0
Reply
Jenna Manni

Hey guys, look at the upside: this new camera will probably drive the prices down on the XF305 and the DSLRs. Hopefully.

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

I don't think there would be a price drop because of this - Canon completely SKIPPED the DSLR Filmmakers

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Jenna Manni

Come January, there might be a lot of barely-used xf300s and xf305s on the market as people upgrade.

November 3, 2011

3
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

My fellow filmmakers are just hoping the "THE OTHER CAMERA" in the PICS - is the low price alternative - wishful thinking :)

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Jenna Manni

OMFG!!! - its $20 thousand F@#KING DOLLARS

WHAT THE F@#K ARE THEY SMOKING!!!!!!!!

November 3, 2011

-1
Reply
Paul

They must have been hanging around Zacuto too long and taken some advice on pricing.

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Darius

And no glass at that price.

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Jacques E. Bouchard

Not a bad camera, but there is no way Scorsese shoots on one of these.

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
Darius

$20k! wasted my time waiting for this announcement...

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
dd

Hehe - it looks awfully like the original Scarlet mock-ups. Pretty close in specs too, but more expensive and not as good by several margins.

I think RED will win this battle, even though I haven't a clue what they're announcing, perhaps to such an emphatic extent that they actually sell more units of whatever they announce tonight, despite the Canon hype-machine.

November 3, 2011

1
Reply
Lucas Adamson

I'm not impressed. I can buy 33 Sony NEX-5n s for $20,000.00 and they will shoot 1080p 60fps.

RED announcement in about 10 min. Hope they have something worthwhile.

November 3, 2011

2
Reply
c.d.embrey

Honestly, I'd probably get this before I'd get an F3 because of the size & portability. No it's not 4:4:4 but I'm sure the images hold up very well. The footprint of this cam is very very acceptable. I'd pay 16k-20k for it.
with the f3 you'd need to buy the s-log upgrade plus the Gemini external recorder(plus drives) which will make it larger and more expensive. The name of the game these days is portability.

November 3, 2011

2
Reply

$47K for the CN-E 30-300mm Zoom + $20K for the body. That's $67K for their Cinema camera package. Add accessories and that would put this well out of reach for the prosumer and indie filmmaker market. That's not worth it for only 1080p output

November 4, 2011

-1
Reply

Can somebody please tell me why this has to be almost 4 times as expensive as the Eos 1D Mk IV ?

November 4, 2011

-3
Reply
Heiko

fail

November 4, 2011

-3
Reply

20K? That's it? Let me just reach in my back pocket and order 2 of them!

November 5, 2011

0
Reply