<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mac Pro Gets an Update from Apple, Major Features Are Still Missing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndiaWilds</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-193834</link>
		<dc:creator>IndiaWilds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-193834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fortunately I bought a MacbookPro 17 inch and it got delivered a day before the announcement. I knew they are not going to upgrade the towers. At this point of time, for me mobility is more important. If Apple would have introduced a 6 core or more MacbookPro 17 inch, I would have bought that. Screen size is important for showing to people in the field. 

I would still give them the benefit of the doubt and hope that in the first quarter 2013 they launch a completely redesigned Mac Pro. I am sure they understand that there will be more of 4k filming next year and hence the need to edit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately I bought a MacbookPro 17 inch and it got delivered a day before the announcement. I knew they are not going to upgrade the towers. At this point of time, for me mobility is more important. If Apple would have introduced a 6 core or more MacbookPro 17 inch, I would have bought that. Screen size is important for showing to people in the field. </p>
<p>I would still give them the benefit of the doubt and hope that in the first quarter 2013 they launch a completely redesigned Mac Pro. I am sure they understand that there will be more of 4k filming next year and hence the need to edit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heiko</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-193275</link>
		<dc:creator>Heiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-193275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh, now that is not an upgrade worth mentioning.
The CPUs aren&#039;t the problem in current MacPros, it&#039;s the lack of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt. Also the GPU are really out of date.
I mean I have this 2010 MacPro with the standard GPU and it was already out of date in 2010 when the MacPro was purchased. Not to mention the standard GPU in this MacPro has been a 150 bucks mid-range GPU to start with...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, now that is not an upgrade worth mentioning.<br />
The CPUs aren&#8217;t the problem in current MacPros, it&#8217;s the lack of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt. Also the GPU are really out of date.<br />
I mean I have this 2010 MacPro with the standard GPU and it was already out of date in 2010 when the MacPro was purchased. Not to mention the standard GPU in this MacPro has been a 150 bucks mid-range GPU to start with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edit_not_Shoot</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-193260</link>
		<dc:creator>Edit_not_Shoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-193260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixed that for you - 
Switching to a good HP Z series is easy once you make the investement; the investment isn’t money but time. Time spent not worrying about the computer, time spent not reinstalling Windows, time spent not dealing with driver issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed that for you &#8211;<br />
Switching to a good HP Z series is easy once you make the investement; the investment isn’t money but time. Time spent not worrying about the computer, time spent not reinstalling Windows, time spent not dealing with driver issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edit_not_Shoot</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-193258</link>
		<dc:creator>Edit_not_Shoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-193258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look into my eyes... Mac Pro is not dead... Look into my eyes... Mac Pro is not dead... Look into my eyes... Mac Pro is not dead... Look into my eyes... Mac Pro is not dead... Give us your money... Look into my eyes... Keep buying the toys... Mac Pro is not dead... We are not dumbing down... Look into my eyes... Mac Pro makes you look like a Pro... You&#039;re so cool... Look into my eyes...

It amazes me how gullible some people are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look into my eyes&#8230; Mac Pro is not dead&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230; Mac Pro is not dead&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230; Mac Pro is not dead&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230; Mac Pro is not dead&#8230; Give us your money&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230; Keep buying the toys&#8230; Mac Pro is not dead&#8230; We are not dumbing down&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230; Mac Pro makes you look like a Pro&#8230; You&#8217;re so cool&#8230; Look into my eyes&#8230;</p>
<p>It amazes me how gullible some people are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-192063</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-192063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I&#039;d hear the phrase, &quot;Get a PC&quot; after years of Apple devotees thumbing their noses at those of us video guys who worked for companies standardized on Intel/Microsoft platforms. I read the Steve Jobs biography and it proved to me what we suspected all along - he was a megalomaniacal genius with serious control issues forcing the world to compute &quot;his way&quot;. I guess I&#039;m too much of a rebel at heart to fall in step and have paid for it - &quot;You don&#039;t use an Apple? Is there any other editing program than Final Cut?&quot; No, and yes.

I use a $2000 off-shelf HP workstation, just bumped my nVidia card up to a whole new level, stuffed it with 24 MB of RAM, and am connected to 20 TB of RAID storage - all affordable, flexible, dependable, crash-free, and am about to install CS6. When I have questions there&#039;s an Internet full of others who share how they trick out their MS machines for low money so I can spend the leftover on video gear and plane tickets. Now that the playing field is more level, I look forward to focusing on what people are making than what they&#039;re making it with. Just sayin&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I&#8217;d hear the phrase, &#8220;Get a PC&#8221; after years of Apple devotees thumbing their noses at those of us video guys who worked for companies standardized on Intel/Microsoft platforms. I read the Steve Jobs biography and it proved to me what we suspected all along &#8211; he was a megalomaniacal genius with serious control issues forcing the world to compute &#8220;his way&#8221;. I guess I&#8217;m too much of a rebel at heart to fall in step and have paid for it &#8211; &#8220;You don&#8217;t use an Apple? Is there any other editing program than Final Cut?&#8221; No, and yes.</p>
<p>I use a $2000 off-shelf HP workstation, just bumped my nVidia card up to a whole new level, stuffed it with 24 MB of RAM, and am connected to 20 TB of RAID storage &#8211; all affordable, flexible, dependable, crash-free, and am about to install CS6. When I have questions there&#8217;s an Internet full of others who share how they trick out their MS machines for low money so I can spend the leftover on video gear and plane tickets. Now that the playing field is more level, I look forward to focusing on what people are making than what they&#8217;re making it with. Just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijayendran</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191735</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijayendran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the Mac Pro, and run my business around it. When I was Windows-centric, cutting in Premiere Pro CS I ran into hangups of every kind: Windows errors, weird hangups with USB drives, and DVD burning issues. I bought a used Mac to edit one thing for a FCP client and that was it.

Switching over to Mac is easy once you make the investment; the investment isn&#039;t money but time. Time spent not worrying about the computer, time spent not reinstalling Windows, time spent not dealing with driver issues. I stopped being a gearhead and focused on the work. I also stopped using FCP (an Apple product designed by a Windows programmer, with all its strange buggy quirks) and went with Avid  and Adobe, which all run perfectly fast and in 64bit on my 8-core Mac, from 2008. I have a Caldigit USB 3/eSata for expansion but never installed a single driver.

I don&#039;t own an iPhone or iPod (does a Shuffle really count?) so I&#039;m not a fanboy. I just want my tools to work. When I sell my Af100 for a Scarlet, I&#039;ll know the computer can crunch the media and not worry that it&#039;ll croak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the Mac Pro, and run my business around it. When I was Windows-centric, cutting in Premiere Pro CS I ran into hangups of every kind: Windows errors, weird hangups with USB drives, and DVD burning issues. I bought a used Mac to edit one thing for a FCP client and that was it.</p>
<p>Switching over to Mac is easy once you make the investment; the investment isn&#8217;t money but time. Time spent not worrying about the computer, time spent not reinstalling Windows, time spent not dealing with driver issues. I stopped being a gearhead and focused on the work. I also stopped using FCP (an Apple product designed by a Windows programmer, with all its strange buggy quirks) and went with Avid  and Adobe, which all run perfectly fast and in 64bit on my 8-core Mac, from 2008. I have a Caldigit USB 3/eSata for expansion but never installed a single driver.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own an iPhone or iPod (does a Shuffle really count?) so I&#8217;m not a fanboy. I just want my tools to work. When I sell my Af100 for a Scarlet, I&#8217;ll know the computer can crunch the media and not worry that it&#8217;ll croak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Update to the Mac Pro May Be Coming from Apple After All, but When? - NoFilmSchool</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191730</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Update to the Mac Pro May Be Coming from Apple After All, but When? - NoFilmSchool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if you were one of the many professionals (or enthusiasts) that were disappointed by the almost non-existent Mac Pro update, and a little jealous of the attention that the Macbook Pro received, there may be some hope after [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you were one of the many professionals (or enthusiasts) that were disappointed by the almost non-existent Mac Pro update, and a little jealous of the attention that the Macbook Pro received, there may be some hope after [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Radish Alec</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191718</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Radish Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My apologies.  Guess they came off kind of harsh when I only wanted to throw a little me-sized bucket of cold water on the writhing mass of moaning. 

In the end it comes off as super negative but it&#039;s just because I&#039;ve read so many comments that seem to totally ignore people who say &quot;the camera doesn&#039;t make the movie&quot; and &quot;the computer/software doesn&#039;t make that much of a difference&quot; and figured maybe the same basic message will be noticed if it&#039;s a little more aggro. So I apologize for that aggro perhaps souring your experience of the lower 1/10 of the comments for which I&#039;m responsible.  :)

Interesting, the whole &quot;professional&quot; debate is one I get into regularly with good friends who will argue until they&#039;re blue that the creative fields are rife with sell-outs and subpar efforts.  I tend to fall on the opposite side of things; feeling generally that creative services are a business model, and that quality often plays a greatly decreased part in determining success because things like marketing, promotion, and entrepreneurial hustle can and do play a bigger role, and as a result, since those things are a necessity of making money, it&#039;s unfair to say one professional is better/worse than a nonprofessional, because it&#039;s not apples to apples. But I digress, per the usual.... Anyhow, sorry for the inconvenience. I&#039;ve had a shit day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies.  Guess they came off kind of harsh when I only wanted to throw a little me-sized bucket of cold water on the writhing mass of moaning. </p>
<p>In the end it comes off as super negative but it&#8217;s just because I&#8217;ve read so many comments that seem to totally ignore people who say &#8220;the camera doesn&#8217;t make the movie&#8221; and &#8220;the computer/software doesn&#8217;t make that much of a difference&#8221; and figured maybe the same basic message will be noticed if it&#8217;s a little more aggro. So I apologize for that aggro perhaps souring your experience of the lower 1/10 of the comments for which I&#8217;m responsible.  :)</p>
<p>Interesting, the whole &#8220;professional&#8221; debate is one I get into regularly with good friends who will argue until they&#8217;re blue that the creative fields are rife with sell-outs and subpar efforts.  I tend to fall on the opposite side of things; feeling generally that creative services are a business model, and that quality often plays a greatly decreased part in determining success because things like marketing, promotion, and entrepreneurial hustle can and do play a bigger role, and as a result, since those things are a necessity of making money, it&#8217;s unfair to say one professional is better/worse than a nonprofessional, because it&#8217;s not apples to apples. But I digress, per the usual&#8230;. Anyhow, sorry for the inconvenience. I&#8217;ve had a shit day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191687</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the 6970M which is in the current iMac?  You are saying it will work?  It does not seem to be on the list, I read somewhere that you can go into the text file and literally add your card to the list and it will work?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the 6970M which is in the current iMac?  You are saying it will work?  It does not seem to be on the list, I read somewhere that you can go into the text file and literally add your card to the list and it will work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191686</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[geez calm down all your comments are so negative and for what reason? because some people feel the need for more power?  i come to this website because i enjoy the great, well written articles as well as the forums where i can reach out to gain advice. i respect your opinion but no need to totally trash it all with your crazy multiple rants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geez calm down all your comments are so negative and for what reason? because some people feel the need for more power?  i come to this website because i enjoy the great, well written articles as well as the forums where i can reach out to gain advice. i respect your opinion but no need to totally trash it all with your crazy multiple rants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191685</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to be clear: Mercury Engine supports OpenCL acceleration, so Radeon cards do work minus 5 or so blur effects. If you&#039;re looking for fast cutting, transitions, and color correction then you&#039;re in the clear. The &quot;update&quot; to the Mac Pro is still a flop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear: Mercury Engine supports OpenCL acceleration, so Radeon cards do work minus 5 or so blur effects. If you&#8217;re looking for fast cutting, transitions, and color correction then you&#8217;re in the clear. The &#8220;update&#8221; to the Mac Pro is still a flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Radish Alec</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191680</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Radish Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I make a living using a MacBook Pro 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo with more dents in the lid from being toted around from job to job than any other notebook I&#039;ve ever seen.  I used FCS and now FCPX at a third of the price.  With my funds I&#039;ve invested in more camera equipment and necessities for running my small business.  I&#039;d hardly say I was flim-flammed on any of those purchases.  But I digress because that doesn&#039;t matter to my point....

I&#039;m not saying anyone is or isn&#039;t a hack, but statistically, based on the low ratio of success in this creative field and others similar to it, there WILL be a majority of people whose best efforts are a lower quality than a much smaller portion whose work really stands out.  To put it bluntly, statistically speaking, your work, my work, and most of our work here, probably DOES suck, probably IS crap, and needs a lot more help than a simple hardware or software update can proffer. Part of being a &quot;professional&quot; is recognizing that fact, critiquing your own work, and then wisely choosing where to invest your money based on what yields the largest gain.  Being a &quot;professional&quot; requires there to be a self-sustaining profitable enterprise.  We aren&#039;t all equals, and you can bloviate ad nauseam about this and that anecdotal scenario but a betting man (or woman) would be a fool to put money on your work, or my work, as being anything other than mediocre and that it won&#039;t be fixed by whatever business model Apple may decide to go with this week, month, or year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make a living using a MacBook Pro 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo with more dents in the lid from being toted around from job to job than any other notebook I&#8217;ve ever seen.  I used FCS and now FCPX at a third of the price.  With my funds I&#8217;ve invested in more camera equipment and necessities for running my small business.  I&#8217;d hardly say I was flim-flammed on any of those purchases.  But I digress because that doesn&#8217;t matter to my point&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying anyone is or isn&#8217;t a hack, but statistically, based on the low ratio of success in this creative field and others similar to it, there WILL be a majority of people whose best efforts are a lower quality than a much smaller portion whose work really stands out.  To put it bluntly, statistically speaking, your work, my work, and most of our work here, probably DOES suck, probably IS crap, and needs a lot more help than a simple hardware or software update can proffer. Part of being a &#8220;professional&#8221; is recognizing that fact, critiquing your own work, and then wisely choosing where to invest your money based on what yields the largest gain.  Being a &#8220;professional&#8221; requires there to be a self-sustaining profitable enterprise.  We aren&#8217;t all equals, and you can bloviate ad nauseam about this and that anecdotal scenario but a betting man (or woman) would be a fool to put money on your work, or my work, as being anything other than mediocre and that it won&#8217;t be fixed by whatever business model Apple may decide to go with this week, month, or year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: popstream</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191661</link>
		<dc:creator>popstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, the raging fanbois would rather slog along on 8 bit, until apple tells them 64 bit is cool, around third quarter of 2013. 

and no radish-head, just because you stop to offer a comment on the forum, it doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re a wanna-be hack. it means, possibly, that you&#039;re analyzing options, and not facebooking apple and begging them to take your money. 

they flim-flammed you on the editing software, and now they&#039;re trying it again with the hardware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the raging fanbois would rather slog along on 8 bit, until apple tells them 64 bit is cool, around third quarter of 2013. </p>
<p>and no radish-head, just because you stop to offer a comment on the forum, it doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re a wanna-be hack. it means, possibly, that you&#8217;re analyzing options, and not facebooking apple and begging them to take your money. </p>
<p>they flim-flammed you on the editing software, and now they&#8217;re trying it again with the hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FabDex</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191654</link>
		<dc:creator>FabDex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It know it&#039;s pretty safe to buy an 8 core PC running Win7 64bits with the Adobe suite and do amazing work, get paid for it, all with a minimum of bugs. Premiere Pro equals or surpasses Final Cut 7. No joke. Time to move on. Mac-heads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It know it&#8217;s pretty safe to buy an 8 core PC running Win7 64bits with the Adobe suite and do amazing work, get paid for it, all with a minimum of bugs. Premiere Pro equals or surpasses Final Cut 7. No joke. Time to move on. Mac-heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191649</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets look at it this way: The Mac Pros run off Xeon processors. The new E5 and E7 lines are expensive... couple that with Apple&#039;s markup and you have a Mac Pro that is twice the price. A bump up to the 12 core system (two chips with 6 physical cores) is a nice incentive for those just buying into the system for the first time. The &quot;new&quot; processor is still from 2010... although to be fair the Xeon line doesn&#039;t move quickly.

What surprised me, and granted I&#039;m a loyal Windows user and have no real emotions towards Apple, is their piss poor attempt at the upgrade. They could have at least added a mother board with USB3, Thunderbolt, eSATA some more PCIe slots, more internal SATA connectors and redesigned the interior of the case to have more hard drive bays and more exterior room for the accompanying PCIe expansion. At least build in some incentive for current owners to upgrade. As it is, why spend close to $4,000 for, as Apple&#039;s site suggests, 1.3x times more performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets look at it this way: The Mac Pros run off Xeon processors. The new E5 and E7 lines are expensive&#8230; couple that with Apple&#8217;s markup and you have a Mac Pro that is twice the price. A bump up to the 12 core system (two chips with 6 physical cores) is a nice incentive for those just buying into the system for the first time. The &#8220;new&#8221; processor is still from 2010&#8230; although to be fair the Xeon line doesn&#8217;t move quickly.</p>
<p>What surprised me, and granted I&#8217;m a loyal Windows user and have no real emotions towards Apple, is their piss poor attempt at the upgrade. They could have at least added a mother board with USB3, Thunderbolt, eSATA some more PCIe slots, more internal SATA connectors and redesigned the interior of the case to have more hard drive bays and more exterior room for the accompanying PCIe expansion. At least build in some incentive for current owners to upgrade. As it is, why spend close to $4,000 for, as Apple&#8217;s site suggests, 1.3x times more performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Radish Alec</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191640</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Radish Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time I read someone ranting about how they&#039;re the unique professional snowflake I think of jag-offs who insist that you call them Doctor.... when they aren&#039;t medical doctors.... and you encounter them in the supermarket buying celery or some other not-the-ER scenario.  

The real pros aren&#039;t here posting on forums, they&#039;re off on projects being quiet professionals. Everyone else is just A and AA level making rent this month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I read someone ranting about how they&#8217;re the unique professional snowflake I think of jag-offs who insist that you call them Doctor&#8230;. when they aren&#8217;t medical doctors&#8230;. and you encounter them in the supermarket buying celery or some other not-the-ER scenario.  </p>
<p>The real pros aren&#8217;t here posting on forums, they&#8217;re off on projects being quiet professionals. Everyone else is just A and AA level making rent this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191639</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol. I can&#039;t comment on what others may need in terms of hardware/software in their workflow. But I would find it informative if someone had a comment as to why a new iMac with a modern processor and maxed out RAM isn&#039;t an option, considering most of us have been doing this with slower processors, GPU&#039;s, and less RAM for a long time. I will often find myself falling into the &#039;gotta have the best&#039; trap, trying to justify a costly purchase with a faster workflow. For me however, the mediocre difference in speed just does not jusitfy the expense. I&#039;m not doing heavily composited VFX shots on 5K R3D footage so maybe the people who are have a different take.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol. I can&#8217;t comment on what others may need in terms of hardware/software in their workflow. But I would find it informative if someone had a comment as to why a new iMac with a modern processor and maxed out RAM isn&#8217;t an option, considering most of us have been doing this with slower processors, GPU&#8217;s, and less RAM for a long time. I will often find myself falling into the &#8216;gotta have the best&#8217; trap, trying to justify a costly purchase with a faster workflow. For me however, the mediocre difference in speed just does not jusitfy the expense. I&#8217;m not doing heavily composited VFX shots on 5K R3D footage so maybe the people who are have a different take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Radish Alec</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191628</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Radish Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes that&#039;s precisely my point.  

I honestly think a lot of this is navel gazing and prosperity thinking. By which I mean that a lot of us would love to think that we NEED a Mac Pro for what we do, but I can assure you that much like cameras, the computer isn&#039;t going to be the deciding factor most of the time.  I can understand if you&#039;re one of a handful (relatively speaking) of businesses who run a studio, let&#039;s say a VFX shop, and can honestly put a load on a Mac Pro that would buckle an iMac, but I bet out of the 40+ people here commenting there might be ONE person who is doing that, if that many.  For everyone else it&#039;s just wasted money, like driving your Ferrari to work..... on speed limited roads.... in traffic.... while coincidentally NOT being Michael Schumacher. 

I&#039;m quite tired of all the kvetching and Chicken Little ranting like you saw Apple dating another girl.  Digital cinema workflows existed before the iBlah IntelMD NvidiWhatever these schmucks think they need. A lack of USB3 and Thunderbolt isn&#039;t going to make your 1, 2, or even 3 camera shot edit a total disaster you bunch of whiners who wish that you could even saturate an existing Mac Pro&#039;s data pipes with your work!

*and breath*

I need to drink less coffee...... makes me ragey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that&#8217;s precisely my point.  </p>
<p>I honestly think a lot of this is navel gazing and prosperity thinking. By which I mean that a lot of us would love to think that we NEED a Mac Pro for what we do, but I can assure you that much like cameras, the computer isn&#8217;t going to be the deciding factor most of the time.  I can understand if you&#8217;re one of a handful (relatively speaking) of businesses who run a studio, let&#8217;s say a VFX shop, and can honestly put a load on a Mac Pro that would buckle an iMac, but I bet out of the 40+ people here commenting there might be ONE person who is doing that, if that many.  For everyone else it&#8217;s just wasted money, like driving your Ferrari to work&#8230;.. on speed limited roads&#8230;. in traffic&#8230;. while coincidentally NOT being Michael Schumacher. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite tired of all the kvetching and Chicken Little ranting like you saw Apple dating another girl.  Digital cinema workflows existed before the iBlah IntelMD NvidiWhatever these schmucks think they need. A lack of USB3 and Thunderbolt isn&#8217;t going to make your 1, 2, or even 3 camera shot edit a total disaster you bunch of whiners who wish that you could even saturate an existing Mac Pro&#8217;s data pipes with your work!</p>
<p>*and breath*</p>
<p>I need to drink less coffee&#8230;&#8230; makes me ragey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hummer</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191602</link>
		<dc:creator>Hummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, but what will all the butthurt &quot;professional&quot; editors say when that happens?

Probably nothing. And then they&#039;ll buy one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, but what will all the butthurt &#8220;professional&#8221; editors say when that happens?</p>
<p>Probably nothing. And then they&#8217;ll buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/mac-pro-update-major-features-missing/comment-page-1/#comment-191601</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=24760#comment-191601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good question. Clearly the upgradeability of a Mac Pro can&#039;t be the only factor, since clearly everyobody is eagerly awaiting a new one. So if upgrading your Mac Pro every 4 years translates to updating your iMac every 2, wouldn&#039;t you still come out ahead financially? Assuming a new iMac can handle your workflow of course. Running CS6, Resolve, and Smoke would certainly be enough for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question. Clearly the upgradeability of a Mac Pro can&#8217;t be the only factor, since clearly everyobody is eagerly awaiting a new one. So if upgrading your Mac Pro every 4 years translates to updating your iMac every 2, wouldn&#8217;t you still come out ahead financially? Assuming a new iMac can handle your workflow of course. Running CS6, Resolve, and Smoke would certainly be enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
