We've relaunched as a full community! Get the scoop:

January 3, 2013

Sony NEX-VG900: a Real Video Camera, or a Full-Frame DSLR in Disguise?

Many had very high hopes that the first full-frame video camera from Sony, or anyone for that matter, the NEX-VG900, might be a huge step up from DSLRs, not only in form factor, but in image quality. While there may not be enough footage out there (it's certainly not as popular as DSLRs or something like the BMCC), reviews are starting to come in for the camera. We've got a full review from Caleb Pike over at DSLR Video Shooter, as well as some comparisons between the VG900 and cameras like the GH2, GH3, Blackmagic Cinema Camera, Canon 5D Mark III, and the FS100.

First, here's Caleb's full review, which includes a lot about actually shooting with the camera, which is equally as important in some cases as the overall image quality:

Check out some more footage from the VG900 below:

A comparison from EOSHD of the VG900 with the Mark III, GH2, GH3, BMCC, and FS100:

http://vimeo.com/53821829

There is a lot to like about this camera, at least in terms of specs and what it has to offer over a DSLR. I still can't fully speak to the usability without getting my hands on one, but it seems like it will be similar to any of the video cameras you might have used in the past, like the HVX or XH-A1 -- or any other cameras from Sony in the same form factor. In this camera size I feel like we can do better -- closer to the Canon C100/C300/C500 -- but none of them will be as steady as a shoulder camera unless you're using some sort of rig to stabilize.

This camera likely has the same sensor as the Sony A99, which is probably the reason for the pricing -- $3,300 vs. the A99 at $2,800. It doesn't offer many of the features that one might expect in a true video camera, like ND filters, but it does have a flip-out LCD which might seem like a non-issue for DSLR users, but if you're trying to keep things small and simple, this is still the easiest way. At this price I would have liked to have seen ND filters, but that may have raised the price too much for this camera to really compete.

I almost feel like the VG900 is in a strange in-between in terms of performance. It looks like it might resolve a bit more than the 7D/5D, but there is a bit of moire in the image. If you really need an event camera, the Sony NEX-EA50 might be a better choice, as it does basically the same thing this camera does, but in a much better form factor for shooting. You would lose the full-frame capability, but that may not be useful for everyone. It's really going to come down to what your needs are. If you're looking for a slight step up in image quality, and you're interested in autofocus and the occasional 24MP still image, and the FS100 is too pricy (currently at $4,200), this might be a good option. For a lot of uses, if you don't need full-frame and want to stick with the E-mount, the FS100 will probably give you a better image, and it has full-size XLR inputs built in.

There are other hybrid cameras from Sony in this range, like the NEX-VG30, but this is probably the "flagship" of those cameras -- somewhere between consumer and professional, with just enough to satisfy one and maybe not enough to satisfy another.

Is this a camera that might fit into your shooting style? Have you used the A99, if so, would this camera interest you over that one, especially since they are very similar in specs -- with the VG900 possibly having a slight edge?

Link: Episode 50: Sony NEX-VG900 Camera Review -- DSLR Video Shooter

Your Comment

26 Comments

From the EOSHD shootout vid, it looked worse than any of them. It got hammered in the review as well... Even so, had I not read the review to be swayed, it flat out looked bad. The A99 flick "The Calling" looked amazing and you would think this is the camera it would have been shot on, being primarily a video camera..

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
F.M.L.

No ND filters, no XLR, lame touch-screen, unimpressive footage, moire problems, and hardly an aggressive price.

Pass.

January 3, 2013

-1
Reply
Swested

Fullframe, 60p and uncompressed output in price between 6D and 5D3. For me this is crazy deal, i would go for that. With some fast lens...im really excited. I was looking excatly for something like this.

Only that examples from EOSHD look quite poor. I realy need to try it somewhere. But for me, someone who wants to move from cheap asp-c canons to full-frame range, this camera offers features, which seemed to be unreacheable some time ago.

And also asp-c function for sensor. They just got me :D

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
Mike

FWIW, the Mk. III can be had for well under $3k now. And it'll do uncompressed output in April's firmware. Still no 60P, though.

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
Swested

Hopefully in April, they can upgrade the MII to look as if it shoots 1080p and no 620p.

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
VINCEGORTHO

I always mention the D800.
Why not that camera. Or even a D600.

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
VINCEGORTHO

I think that there is not a change to use nikon or canon lenses with it yet because the current adaptors like the metabones do not cover the full frame

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
Arturo sanchez

Sony is really flooding the market with cameras, which is good. The hard thing to understand about this camera is that emount does not necessarily mean crop sensor. That said, you put an emount lens on and it activates the aps-c mode. If you put the adapter to amount lenses then you are able to shoot full frame. The thing is once you get amount lenses, there are no other cameras to use them on besides SLT (SONY DSLR) cameras. There is no Amount to EF or Nikon or MFT. If there was you couldn't control aperture. It makes the case for off brand lenses with no electronics and aperture control on the barrel of the lens. With those lenses you can adapt to emount, the 5D, AF100, GH3, PL, F3 all day every day. Seems the mirror less cameras are super flexible in terms of lens selection.

January 3, 2013

0
Reply

You can actually adapt A-mount to MFT and manually control the aperture on the adapter itself. It's even clickless, despite having a very short throw. It's a little known fact that the Alpha mount actually rocks the house. You can get old Minolta lenses on the cheap that will continuously autofocus and track subjects on all the Sony E-Mount cameras (with LA-EA2 adapter) and adapt to MFT as manual lenses too. Same with Nikon G, except they focus backwards.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

That's what I do with my GH2. Use old minota AF a-mount lenses where I control the iris via the adapter.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

Read the description below:

http://www.metabones.com/sony/buy-eos-nex-adapter

Then the metabones canon-nex adapter does not work with the vg900.
Does anyone know if there would be another option to use canon lenses with the vg900?

January 3, 2013

0
Reply
Arturo sanchez

Yes, there are other electronic adaptor coming out so hopefully someone will find out what works on the VG.
I have one (not metabones) in the mail and when it arrives it I'll be doing a review.
( youtube.com/nitsanpictures ) with the NEX-6.
I havn't got a VG-900 but i'll take a trip to a shop that has one and i'll give it a go.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

Can't believe moire is still there at this price point.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

I think Canon and Nikon should really go for this market. A video camera, at a DSLR price point, with a DSLR brain and with our current collection of lenses.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply
Pierre Roquet

is it just me or is the word "shooter" misspelled in the first video titles? Someone should let them know so they can fix that, sort of embarrassing.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply
jeremy

How is the video quality on the EA50? Is it in the same realm as the NEX 5N? Reviews seem few and far between.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply
mike_tee_vee

Someone pointed that out on his site and he said he was fixing it. That was kinda funny....and painful too.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

Oops. That was in regards to the comment above about "shooter" bring misspelled.

January 4, 2013

0
Reply

If you want a full frame camcorder that could use almost any FF or APS-C DSLR lens made the VG900 is it.
https://vimeo.com/56737845
https://vimeo.com/54180819
https://vimeo.com/54131282
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6EmdyBPF2w&list=FLy5rjJCnLvK3hhhjL79f0AQ

January 4, 2013

0
Reply
Joe Ogiba

I can't be the only one who is wondering...WTF was that?

Definitely in the running for the most bizarre gear demo video of all time.

January 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Swested

I clicked a link in my youtube favorites of the VG900 DOF comparison and it loaded my youtube favorites instead.

Here is the link to the VG900 DOF comparison with APS-C etc :
http://youtu.be/Z6EmdyBPF2w

How do you edit posts here ?

January 5, 2013

0
Reply
Joe Ogiba

you don´t know Bokehlicious-Kai??? hahahha :D

January 7, 2013

0
Reply

Wow...I was given so much bad info on this cam in HD VIDEO PRO magazine: full frame sensor shooting great in low light and heavy shadows?; XLR inputs?; lenses pop on without needing an adapter? Am I misreading these reviews again? Are they legit reviews without being bought and owned by SONY? I really thought this was going to be the cam to shoot an hellacious indie feature as opposed to the BLACKMAGIC and even the RED ( at least dollar for dollar).

March 5, 2013

0
Reply
MARK11

Ok, realizing that the d800 and d600 are respected cameras, and though Nikon made them with serious video functions, I can say that I have a friend with a d600 and its low light sucks. D800 also has ho-hum low light performance that gets really noisy with high iso's.

From my experience of owning nikons and canons, Nikon is really intended for photography during the day time, and canon is more for videography in the evening time.

March 16, 2013

0
Reply
Chris

I am going to Buy a Camera for Professional Film Making and Now my search stop on 2 Model

1- Cannon EOS 5D - Market prise - 2,50,000/- INR

2- SONY NEX VG 900 - Market prize - 1,70,000/- INR

both are good quality HD picture and easy to Operate but SONY is Cheaper then Cannon

March 22, 2013

0
Reply

Hi,
Can someone shed some light for me please. Pardon my ignorance but I dont really understand technical jargon so I'm hoping someone can give me a simple answer to my question.
I currently own a Canon XL2 Camcorder and use a XL adaptor to attach my Canon 100 - 400 lens. By using this adaptor is magnifys the images by about 7 times...I think its 7. (superb for what I film - wildlife footage)
I'm now looking for a HD cam, which is lighter to carry & one that will accept my Canon 100 - 400 lens and most importantly magnify the image to the same degree...does the Sony NEX VG900 tick the box? will it allow me to zoom in really close?
Thanks in advance
Steve

May 20, 2013

0
Reply
steve