March 17, 2013

MFT BMCC and John Brawley Capture More Beautiful Footage, and SLR Magic 25mm T/0.95 is Shipping

It may be a few months away from getting into the hands of us regular folks, but the Micro 4/3 mount version of the Blackmagic Cinema Camera has gotten plenty of work in a number of real-world situations thanks to John Brawley. While he's been testing plenty of PL mount lenses on the camera (we've got some brand new footage below), he's also been trying out of all of the manual MFT lenses that are currently out there, including those from Voightlander, and a brand new lens from SLR Magic, the new T/0.95 lens, which just may be a perfect go-to option for the MFT BMCC.

Here is Brawley shooting a bit with the Angenieux 16-42mm and the 45-120mm PL lenses:

We've also seen that the new SLR Magic HyperPrime CINE 25mm T/0.95 lens has been shipping, here is Brawley's on the BMCC:

A few people have gotten their hands on it, and have tested it against the slightly more expensive Voigtlander 25mm f/0.95, and the SLR Magic seems to be just as good, if not better in terms of sharpness. Here is a great example of what kind of images the lens can produce from Seb Farges on the GH3:

Another one from Seb briefly comparing the Voigtlander 25mm and the SLR Magic 25mm:

I think this is going to be another great option for the BMCC. With the SLR Magic 12mm T/1.6 and 25mm T/0.95, you've got lenses that are both very fast and take care of many of your wide and medium to medium-close shots. These lenses also have the benefit of de-clicked apertures, so you can smoothly do an aperture pull during a scene if needed. I know some are partial to having someone like Duclos doing the gears, but it's great that the lens gears are already built-in, very similar to the Samyang/Rokinon cine lenses.

Right now according to the website these lenses will ship about two weeks after you order, and if you buy them now, you may still be able to qualify for a $150 rebate, which takes the normally $800 SLR Magic lens down to $650. That's quite a bargain considering the Voigtlander currently runs over $1,000.

Links:

Your Comment

35 Comments

I'm throwing my credit card at the screen and nothing is happening.
Ohwait I'm broke.
Definitely goes on my Christmas list.

March 17, 2013

1
Reply
Hubert Hotte

We wait almost a year and still no camera nor a Micro 4/3 mount.
We are now looking for something different.... better.

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply

There are plenty of BMCC's in the market now from people who preordered. I personally know 3 people and 5 rental houses here in NYC. Looking forward to the MFT, though.

March 18, 2013

-1
Reply
alex

What cage is John using on his BMCC? Does anyone recognize it?

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply
Andrey Valentsov

It is the Bebob light cage.

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply
Haavard Helle

god i love the images that come out of this camera. the colour and light representation is just fantastic. having worked on enough reality TV over the years, the DoF is the equivalent to the old 2/3" digibeta and newer XD CAMs (F800), but there's something that really sets these images apart. i think detail plays into it a bit, but mostly i think the colour and DR are what clinches it.

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply

time to eat my words and be a super hypocrite but i guess my next film is being made with a BMCC, we needed a small sensor look and couldn't afford the telecine for super 16mm, and the digital bolex is still in development i guess. we'll be using schneider lenses mostly, with the occasional leica-r from my personal bag for closeups and shit. to be honest, im kinda excited. and humbled.

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply
john jeffreys

wow

March 18, 2013

0
Reply
alex

WANT. NOW.

Although the ultimate dream would be an active m4/3's...

March 17, 2013

0
Reply
Swested

Whats a better solution a black magic canon mount with metabone speedboosters nikon to canon with manual old nikon glass i think the widest would be a 20mm and with speedbooster it would make it the equivalent of a 35 mm or MFT mount black magic

March 17, 2013

0
Reply
JayClout

Well, first you should get the one that suits your needs the most.
But, second: there is no Nikon to Canon Speedbooster, nor most likely will there be due to the Speedbooster adapting a lens with a larger image circle to a mount made for a sensor optimized for a smaller image circle. Since both F and EF mounts accommodate the same size of sensor, you wouldn't see any benefit. That said, adapting Nikon to Canon is what many do anyway -- just not via a speed booster.
Since you seem to be aiming for entirely manual lenses, I'd say that the MFT version might make more sense, since it'll be able to adapt to a wider range of manual lenses including the same Nikons you might use on the EF mount. Also, there will eventually be an MFT Speedbooster, so you'll have that to look forward to.

March 17, 2013

-1
Reply
Blah

appreciate the good info

March 17, 2013

0
Reply
JayClout

Those few ones living in a parallel universes in which BMCCs do exist are very lucky.

March 17, 2013

-2
Reply
Premini

Beautiful images... just a shame it's taken so long for people. If they release an active M43 at somepoint, equiped with speed booster, I wonder how that will fare as a B cam to a RED or Alexa. (Probably matches an Alexa better but I own a Scarlet)

March 17, 2013

0
Reply

Probably would match a Scarlet better most likely based on equal usable DR. Color disparity on a Raw 16 and 12 bit camera will have less impact than luminance distribution. I've seen some nasty moire on BMC also, don't think it will make the cut on Alexa shoots.

March 18, 2013

-4
Reply
ryan

Actually the opposite.

The "look" from the BMCC in FILM mode very closely matches the Alexa, especially if you shoot ProRes. It's much closer to the Alexa than the RED / EPIC.

The extra Resolution of the EPIC also makes the cuts more obvious.

jb

March 18, 2013

0
Reply
John Brawley

yeah. The tests posed here by Ryan E Walters a few weeks ago showed that the color and image more closely matched the Alexa than the Epic. This is a sweet little camera.

March 18, 2013

0
Reply

On another note, the GH3 actually looks pretty damn nice with the Voigt too. Makes a perfect B-cam to the BMCC...which is my plan.

March 17, 2013

-2
Reply
Swested

Must say I love the camera details.....but the more I look at footages from the BMC I can't help but to think "VIDEO LOOK" kind of make me miss the soft look of the canon DSLR....we are going to see lots of crap video from this camera in the wrong hands....just saying.

March 18, 2013

-2
Reply
Alvin

Uh wrong. The video look is in the canon camp...not the bmcc. Watch philip blooms ponte tower or dungenous vids.

March 18, 2013

-1
Reply
gradon p.

video look is not in any camp, its in the grade. Alexa looks super video in Scandal, but looks filmic in Zero Dark Thirty, its bad when the tricks of filmmaking trick filmmakers. Understand the perception of contrast and you will recognize that the variables controlling the "filmic" feel rarely lies with the camera, at least nowadays.

March 18, 2013

0
Reply
ryan

Can't agree more...

March 18, 2013

-1
Reply
Anh Dang

Agreed as well. 'Avengers' looked like a made for TV Power Rangers movie from 1995... 'Skyfall' looked better than any s35mm production I've ever seen.

March 18, 2013

0
Reply
bwhitz

Agreed again! But i feel the look of Skyfall is down to Deakins more than anything. Amazing camera made to sing by a master craftsman. That shot when he pulls out of the garage in the vintage Aston at dusk is sublime! As for the BMCC... Wow. What stunning images.

March 18, 2013

-2
Reply

Yeah, right...show me a "a made for TV Power Rangers movie from 1995" that had the resolution, lighting, clarity, dynamic range, technical expertise, etc. of 'The Avengers' That film was the perfect of example how to NOT OVERDO the "grade" in post. Digital will never look like film. Because it's video. Stop trying to "grunge it up" in post to do so.

March 19, 2013

-1
Reply
Marcus

The GH3 footage looks incredible! Very sharp and decent highlight roll off. I'd love to play with the camera, atleast the camera actually exists.

March 18, 2013

0
Reply
Caleb

Thanks for sharing ! :)

March 18, 2013

0
Reply

I think the image looks great, with an aesthetic / color rendition somewhat similar to Canon. Most of the BMC videos I've seen have this look. My thing is, I like to shoot a bit flatter / more neutral and do the grade in post. Since I don't have a BMC I can only speak with my experience from Canon, which has the Canon look baked into the video. If you like it, that's great but it's hard to get away from that look since it's so baked in.

Do they have different picture profiles in the BMC if you don't want that saturated, pre-graded look that I keep seeing from the camera? Can you shoot flatter?

March 18, 2013

-1
Reply
Gene Sung

The RAW image from the BMCC is incredibly flat. You put your own "grade" onto it. A lot of people like putting a lot of saturation into BMCC grades because the codec can "take" it and it doesn't fall apart, plus it's skin tones are very pleasing.

jb

March 19, 2013

0
Reply
John Brawley

Sorry guys, but do you really think this are great images? I am not so sure.

March 22, 2013

-1
Reply

I Liked the look of the SLR Magic lens more than the Voigtlander. The skin tones were more natural to me.

March 25, 2013

-1
Reply
Gary Simmons

Looks fantastic.

I am well over the conversations on how this stacks up to film. I don't think digital cinema ever needs to stack up to anything, considering it has come along in leaps and bounds in a very short time.

I love the look of the BMCC and a friend of mine shot commercials recently with one of them and an Alexa, and he was blown away by how well they matched.

It's funny how nobody said Eastman Color stock could never stack up to that amazing black and white look

September 23, 2013

-1
Reply
B S Kumar

It's very effortless to find out any matter on web as compared to books, as I found
this paragraph at this site.

June 18, 2014

1
Reply

That's why the bmcc has a 12bit raw set up. ;] So you can grade away!

July 12, 2014

-1
Reply
charlie boy

Video look? lol um no, it's all about who and how you grade your work. Saying as far as the video look your referring to.

July 12, 2014

-1
Reply
charlie boy