August 4, 2013

RED DRAGON Has Been Unleashed. Here is the First Footage from the 6K Camera

Red DragonThe new DRAGON sensor from RED -- with quoted specs like 6K resolution, clean 2000 ISO, and over 15 stops of dynamic range -- was originally set to be released all the way back in late 2012. There were some promises -- and then some delays. But the sensor is now finally done, and camera upgrades will begin in September. In the last few weeks DRAGON-upgraded cameras have found their way into the hands of professional DPs across the world, many working without any RED supervision. We got our first little tease of what DRAGON is capable of from one of these DPs, Mark Toia, and now he has unleashed the first footage ever from the sensor.

We will likely get something a bit more uncompressed at some point, but Mark was worried about his servers exploding, so at the moment we've got Vimeo to show off the footage all shot at 6K (though you should go download it right from the site for the best quality possible):

Here's some of what he said on REDUser, followed by some stills (there are many more over on the thread). He did a stress test with the camera in all sorts of real-world scenarios, and also reiterated that Jim and Jarred were not part of the test in any way -- it was all him:

The two main areas I wanted the camera to perform in are :

HIGH CONTRAST information, just how much is hiding on the shadows and highlight. And secondly, Just how far can I push it in the dark. What is the most usable ISO without the aid of any noise reducing plugins.

Data was also big question for me, I'm a laptop warrior, I travel the world with RED and MAC.. I don't need anything slowing me down. So the question was, Just how long are these cards going to last… So my idea of testing lower compression rates to save space, and then to push the limits of the ISO into 17:1+ compression to see if it fell apart. The simple answer is no… Dragon @17:1 looks like MX @8:1. So we are all saved, none of us have to run out to buy more cards.

Skin tests, filter tests, IR tests, were also done.

Here is his feedback (bold is mine):

The Red Dragon sensor has 3 F STOPS more than before. 1 in the hight lights which rolls over wonderfully !, 2 solid extra stops in the darks…. maybe 3 once the colour science has been perfected.

But there is still noise, but nothing like before. I ran some 250d 2k film rushes next some of my 4000asa stuff, And silly as it sounds, it looks like film grain, not noise. Don't ask me how, as I wouldn't have a clue. But it looks great !

Red Dragon now has the best highlight fall off I have ever seen from any digital camera. Beating film! Big call I know, but after shooting film and pushing it around in telecine chains for more than a decade, I can categorically say that this new sensor has a better range than film ever had.

Probably the most interesting stuff from a guy who has shot literally everything out there:

The Dragon is more stable than my current MX EPIC's.

The SONY F65 I rate as having the best sensor in the market for a production cine camera. Yes.. it's better than the EPIC- MX. (I'm not going to harp on about the size of it or the price comparisons).

Even Jim knows that Sony have done very well with the F65 sensor and that was obviously pissing him off, because his new Dragon sensor has just given the the F65 notice.

All the F65 SONY purists out there will dispute this. But I have Sony files here with me, and I'm looking at both side by side… and Dragons grain (noise) structure is cleaner and it has more range.

Dragon is now the King. (AND… I'm not going to harp on about the size of it or the price comparisons). or did I ..ha !

The single one sentence i can say that can sum up everything is this..

It's the first camera ever that I have used that captures exactly what I see with my own eye.

Never have I seen this before. !

Click for a larger version (there are many more stills taken from video over on the REDUser post):

Just as a refresher, here are some of the DRAGON specs listed by RED:

SENSOR: 19 MEGAPIXEL DRAGON™

PIXEL ARRAY: 6144 (h) x 3160 (v)

S/N RATIO: 80db

DYNAMIC RANGE: 16.5+ stops

MAX IMAGE AREA: 6144 (h) x 3160 (v)

LENS COVERAGE: 30.7mm (h) x 15.8mm (v) x 34.5 mm (d)

ACQUISITION FORMATS

  • 6K RAW (2:1, 2.4:1)
  • 5K RAW (Full Frame, 2:1, 2.4:1 and Anamorphic 2:1)
  • 4.5K RAW (2.4:1)
  • 4K RAW (16:9, HD, 2:1 and Anamorphic 2:1)
  • 3K RAW (16:9, 2:1 and Anamorphic 2:1)
  • 2K RAW (16:9, 2:1 and Anamorphic 2:1)
  • 1080p RGB (16:9)
  • 720p RGB (16:9)

REDCODE™

  • Compression choices of 18:1 to 3:1
  • 12 and 16-bit RAW : Compression choices of 18:1 to 3:1
  • 1-100 fps 6K
  • 1-120 fps 5K, 4.5K 

  • 1-150 fps 4K
  • 1-200 fps 3K
  • 
1-300 fps 2K

Getting three additional stops of dynamic range is simply huge. Though we'll have to wait a bit to get .R3D files to play around with from the new sensor (since a new version of REDCINE-X that works with DRAGON has not yet been publicly released), it's clear that RED has created something special. Where exactly the MX sensor ranked in terms of dynamic range was up for debate, but now with 3 extra stops, DRAGON has the highest dynamic range of any digital cinema camera out right now. Even if you were rating MX at 12 stops, 3 extra stops puts it at 15, which is pretty amazing when you then consider the 6K resolution, high-ISO, high frame rates, and the fact that dynamic range seems to stay consistent from 250 all the way to 2000 ISO.

Color science on the new sensor is supposedly much improved, and they have spent quite a bit of time behind the scenes trying to make sure that this is right from the get-go. From the looks of things, they are off to a great start. It does remind me a bit of the Sony F65, which is the best resolving 4K camera at the moment (with DRAGON now equalling or surpassing it), and is capable of some unbelievable imagery. The fact that RED is putting all of this tech inside such a tiny body is still mind-blowing.

Something that many have misunderstood along the way: you will not be projecting 6K (though when the capabilities exist you certainly could). 6K will resolve a much higher quality 4K image since you're throwing more pixels at it (think still photographs which are very often 4K and above). This is the true power of 6K. It will also allow for reframing in post for various reasons, including image stabilization. Even a serious crop of the 6K frame will still give you plenty of room to work around, and probably still maintain 4K res.

As far as low-light performance, things are looking promising, and it seems like 4000 ISO is pretty clean, and 6400 is still usable. This is getting into DSLR territory, except you've got much, much more resolution and color depth to work with. I think this low-light performance and dynamic range are the most exciting things about this new sensor.

Current owners have a few upgrade options, but considering a new camera is going to start well under $30,000, it's pretty remarkable just how far we've come.

What do you think?

Links:

Your Comment

243 Comments

Pixels!

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
avatar
Micah Van Hove
Writer
writer, director, dp

I'm not sure what you call this but that is /not/ film grain: http://prntscr.com/1jayx6

However, that footage looks amazing. It's indescribably amazing. I can't wait for some more footage out of this monster.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Tyler

What is Jpeg compression?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Natt

Actually, to me it looks quite a bit like film grain with compression artifacts. I suspect that the "digital" quality to that is coming almost entirely from the compression, not the sensor.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
cows

Almost as good a 60D RAW.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
VinceGORTHO

haven't ever really worked with red, but wow the clarity of that first shot kind of blew me away.

August 4, 2013

-2
Reply
Erik

My initial reaction is fear.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Shane Anderson

Holy. Shit.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply

Worst. Camera. Ever.
Pixelvision=Better :)

But did anyone notice that the water and surf spray in the surfing shots glistened like glitter! Awesome.
The slow motion at 100FPS actually was the best slow motion I've ever seen. Mostly all of the slow motion for digital cameras (to me) has always had a video look to it. I have to say it, this camera beats film, finally.

I wonder if VFX heavy movies will film in 6k for a better key, or just stick to 4k?

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
mr. show

I wonder if that's got to do with having watched many badly made slow motion shots.
I very often come across slow motion shots where the shutter was set at 360º and thus making it look videoish.
Hell, it even happened in full movies like "Captain America: The First Avenger" and "Public Enemy"!

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply

Only question is why after all talking about new color science highlights are steel pink?

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply

Every digital sensor has pink/magenta highlights. Some camera manufacturers fix this in camera and others leave it to users and colorists. There is an option in RED RAW panel called DRX.

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Joe

DRX should be enabled by default, for reals. Seen that shit too many times even in features for fuk sake. Unfortunately, if there's no dickery with strong NDs in these tests, the Dragon can hardly match highlight protection of HDRx option. Well, at least it's native, so no more shutter ghosting and all that.

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Natt

It's not on by default because it distorts the rest of the colors (since it's shifting things around to smooth clip all the color channels at the same place). There are other ways to fix it without DRX that high-end colorists would use to avoid the distortion.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Gabe

DRX fixes pink highlights? Wow! Didn't know that. Thank you!

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply

marketing

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
DIO

Agree.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Shane Anderson

For You

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Natt

wow

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
hansd

holy Shit Shit!!
17:1 100fps 6k ahahahhh 4000iso WOWOWO High dynamic range :))) new color science :)))
RED Dragon is the King sensor :)
Congratulation RED TEAM and MArk for video and still.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
luigi valtulini

art direction..location...lighting package...then pick the the right camera film or digital ...For me I like the work of
chris Nolan, Tarantino, Spielberg, Aronofsky, Wes Anderson...(so I alway try to shoot with an arri st or panavision)

when there is no budget I like the Arri Alexa...(which is HD)

for me

August 4, 2013

2
Reply
DIO

red dragon best of the best... Will upgrade my red epic-m asap...

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Sergey

It really is the best I've ever seen. It makes me wonder what video from the NHK 8K camera looks like.

Individual frames from Red Dragon video used for stills photography will look better than almost every stills camera in the world.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Gene

Mmmm, I really doubt that.

August 7, 2013

1
Reply
dixter

Hands down the most spectacular camera test I've ever seen! 6K - 15 stops - amazing low light and most importantly a color science that knocks the Alexa out of the ball park. The red team must be grinning from ear to ear. Well done!

August 4, 2013

2
Reply
Paul

it looks really soft

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
pablopablo

Well, duh, Vimeo is 1080p

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Natt

Indeed tt looks really soft in several places (low light cityscape etc.), and there is reason for that.

It is called Optical Low Pass Filter, the actual filtering glass/membrane hardware front of the sensor.

Basically this is Red Epic / Scarlet OLPF once again. Red has always compensated their sensor shortcomings by filtering it down a lot. Something that for example Sony F65 does not need to do as much.

This results a softer image than you would normally get with same amount of Bayer data.

Things get really funny, when you lower the capture resolution and Red cameras do not have horsepower to supersample the material like for example Sony F5 / F55 do with 1080P / 2K material.

They crop sensor, resulting extremaly low res images, considering that these are supposed to be 4K / 5K cameras. I still remember how angry Red boys got when it was clear that hacked GH3 actually has easily as sharp 1080P image as Scarlet / Epic in 2K / 1080P mode.

And of course, unless I am mistaken (which is possible) Red Dragon still crops the sensor, which is bit... pathetic. Especially when you consider all the attitude from Red how they rule digital image world.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Juhan-i

That would make sense if these images were shot in cropped mode. And it's true, I think dslr's and especially cameras like the F55/5 or C300 are more sharp in 1080p mode than any Red camera in 1080p. However, most people don't crop their Red sensor that much. I never will again (learned my lesson once). So in the end, the Red still delivers a sharper image because you're shooting at 3-6K instead of cropping it down to 1080p. The only bummer is that it just goes to show how overhyped the cameras are. Jannard is misleading people a little when he says there's 4 times the resolution in an Epic MX, because the 1080p image from that sensor isn't as sharp as a 1080p from most other sensors. I would say an Epic MX has twice the resolution of other 1080p cameras.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Kenneth

Why there is so much noise in all those higher ISO shots ?

And it is noise from the camera, not from the compression. Both wavelets and basic mpeg4 work by removing the high frequency material (=noise) first. It's the first thing compression algorithm does.

When young man with greyish shirt is the facing directly the camera, ISO is 6400 and compression is only 8:1, why there is so much noise ?

And when it comes to overall image quality, how is this material exceptional ? It is great for sure, but something exceptional ? No.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Juhan-i

Somehow I respect the amount of energy you put into hating on RED everytime there's a RED post.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
hansd

To be honest, it is a bit of envy thing.

You see, I have never been that masculine guy, more like a feeble nerd. And I have been looking all these great photos of Jim Jannard online and he looks so... , well manly in them. Like he was ready fight for his country and his family.

And I thought that how could I be manly and just like him ?

So, I noticed that Jim has, or well, his powerful company has these "Shootwear" clothes for sale. And then it hit me !

If just wear one of his cool t-shirts, that could do the trick ! I could finally get laid ! Of course I am a bit older guy so my "intimate performance" is probably going to be bit flaky, but as they say, better late than never !

Althought, one thing I have to admit is that as devoted atheist I found the whole mormon thing bit...different.

But as they say; "Amor vincit omnia ! ", so you never know what could happen, when few right ladies come up.

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Juhan-i

I find this hilarious. The images are kinda bad. Highlights still suck. Compared to an Alexa, heck even an F65, the out of focus highlights are garbage (the surfer girl shot). RED (and it's fans) seems to have no idea what a roll off is. Smooth roll off, celluloid like. Most of the stuff looks like HDRx, which is not what I call roll off. Its like 6 stops over exposure is ok and then, boom...nuclear explosion, no middle ground.

What new color science? It looks just like the MX, maybe a bit cleaner, that's all. Skin tones?? Bah...

Stop swaying to the words of Jannard and RED fanboys like marionettes. Look at the video subjectively, without listening to all the hoopla RED marketing. The Alexa produces a far better image professionally and for you weekend warriors, just stick to a DSLR or a C300. Spend the money you save on lenses.

This is supposed to look like 65mm film?? Don't make me laugh...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
coolstorybro

Cool story, bro. Read the FStop metering and then kick yourself in the nuts.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Natt

Ermm, I did. If you knew anything about F stop metering, you'd know that it only shows the dynamic range of a camera. I specifically complained about the highlights itself. So, if the camera was exposed @ f8, anything above f64, or 6 stops, looks bad, whereas in an Alexa it looks "pleasant". But I think you're not going to agree and post something like "go kick yourself in the nuts", again. That's cool. I'd rather do that then beat off to pics of JJ.

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
coolstorybro

do not worry, judging a test and always easy, there will be 'an early test Alexa vs. Dragon then judge. I certainly hope you're right, otherwise you do? Steps to Red Dragon?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Alexis

While good for being digital this is not even close to 65mm film.

August 4, 2013

1
Reply
Grangrade

"Dragon should never be compared to 35mm film. It should only be spoken in reference to 65mm film from here on out."

-- Jim Jannard, 4th of December, 2012

August 5, 2013

-3
Reply
Daniel

Good grief. It's because of comments like that, that I would never buy a Red. Sent my money to Sony instead.

Whatever, Jimmy.

August 5, 2013

-4
Reply
Bill

KNEEL before Zod.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

Ah, he's just aggressive. He's extremely successful. He wouldn't be if he wasn't aggressive. Buy his camera. Red Dragon is obviously the best. (or isn't it?) There's probably people at the top of Sony that are aggressive too. Wouldn't there be?

August 6, 2013

4
Reply
Gene

Gene, I'm still unsure of your stance... do you like Dragon? Or not?

August 7, 2013

1
Reply
dixter

I have to agree with coolstorybro, the highlight rolloff doesn't look great here, if it even exists. Considering there are a lot of 'highlight porn" shots here that are meant to show how good they look, it's kind of doing the opposite. In no way does it compare to film, or the Alexa, or probably the BMC camera. The only thing I can think is that there is some kind of raw log version of this footage that retains more information and somehow it got graded away. But I kind of doubt that Red would let the footage be released if they thought something in the ingest chain broke the dynamic range of their raw plates.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
koolaid

If nothing else, you may want to reconsider your use of subjective vs objective.

August 4, 2013

2
Reply
David

Highlight roll off is controlled in post, this test is demonstrating the pure amount of dynamic range. This is for people who have been shooting on MX and know how it limits them.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

The images are great. I feel those who believe in RED will laud it as the greatest since sliced bread, and those who don't believe in RED will say it wasn't sooooo impressive.

I think the images look great. But I'd be lying if I told you I think they are so much better than the EPIC MX. I don't think the avg user of the RED cam will achieve this, even using the DRAGON. Toia clearly knows his shit, it shows. Also those belittling the camera high ISO performance mustn't forget that this is not supposed to be competitor to HDSLR in those aspects, they want latitude above all with this camera, and in those aspects it shows.

DRAGON exists, and it looks good. That's awesome, I know someone in my country who has the only RED cam in the whole country who has already ordered the DRAGON update, he will be happy. I can't afford it, and hopefully one day I will be able to rent it.

For the rest of the internets, I'm sure it will be just "on to the next one" camera for them to complain about. Etiher way, RED will make gazillions with this camera. Alexa won't be affected, I don't think this video does anything to win the ALEXA lovers over to the RED camp.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply

If it's not a hacked 5D this forum will bitch about anything above their price bracket.

August 4, 2013

-1
Reply
Thom

Yeah, you could say 'their price bracket'. But since Canon is over-priced you could say, 'their over-priced bracket'.

August 4, 2013

-2
Reply
Gene

Mark Toia gets great footage from all the Red cameras, even the original.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

His stuff looks great!

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Pffttt...5D Magic Lantern looks better...kidding. Looks great!

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Thom

Hard to compare to film because its probably not using lenses that a film would use your image is only as good as the glass it goes through. Looking forward to see a test with Ultra Primes or a cinema lens. Of course he may be using cinema lenses he didn't say in the test. The images are ungraded and have a high compression ratio. I couldn't it look better than film because these other factors have yet to be showcased.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Luke

There it just the little problem that you can not use all the "cinema lenses", if you want the "6K" resolution...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Juhan-i

Well you can't use "cinema" lenses on IMAX cameras either...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

These stills are just grabs from the VIMEO video, correct? I didn't see any TIFFs or JPEGs on Reduser. If so, that should be considered.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Stephen

Finally we get to see Dragon in action, it did not disappoint me one bit. It makes me want to go for the Dragon upgrade right now... but I'll wait, MX is still beautifully capable.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Agent55

Highlight rolloff doesn't look anywhere near the BMCC, especially when you recover highlights from the DNG files in Adobe Camera RAW, but 6K is nice, I guess...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Robert

In my experience the roll off from BMCC was the worst of all the Digital Cine cams. How do you process the footage? Genuinely curious.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply

Roll off is just the curve you put on it...100% user controlled. What you can't control is the dynamic range the camera can capture.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

+1

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
hansd

You mean those BMCC highlights with the black spot in the middle?? :)

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

It''s better than that EPIC. More resolving power and better shadow detail. Color science looks exactly the same. Would I use this over the F65 and Alexa? Doubt it.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Grangrade

why '? problems that had the epic? many people wrong about the workflow and blamed the camera. But are you have some tests to show us the original files, which clearly shows that the epic be a disaster, it would be nice. Otherwise, his answer would be a sincere yes Dragon be a great sensor and Epic be an excellent camera.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Luigi.valtulini

I don't think the EPIC-MX is a disaster. It's a good camera.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Grangrade

Underwhelmed by the test shots. I'd love to see a comparison video with footage pushed to it's breaking point. Only then can we see how far the dragon has come. No doubt it shoots a pretty image, but the test footage doesn't give justice to what can truly be done (if what red says is true).

Under expose an Alexa and dragon side by side , push until one or the other breaks and then push some more. Test the flexibility in a timing session, see when it breaks and then push some more. Etc.

Im excited to see some footage by some proper cinematographers :s.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Brock

AGREE that f65 was king in my opinion, AFTER EARTH COLOR GAMUT and overall look was absolutely amazing, looked damn near better than super 35mm film.

Still think its too early jump ship but considering that it could be 15stops at 6k for around 30k which is 30k cheaper than f65 is amazing.

IMO CURRENT CAMERA RANKS overall look excluding pixels top 5

1. F65
2.ALEXA
3.F55 F/5
4. TIE BLACK MAGIC RAW / PANAVISION GENESIS
5. F3 with 444 dpx

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
jay clout

This ^.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Bob

I suggest the new Oblivion blu-ray -release. Rent it or buy it.

Simply incredible images, which are shot with F65.

(According to person who worked with film, 90% of the material was Sony F65, rest was Red Epic.).

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Juhan-i

I have to second this comment. After seeing "Oblivion", I think the F65 is now the best digital-camera in existence. Alexa a very close second. Dragon is impressive, but it simply is not as impressive as the F65 and Alexa. Perhaps more colour-science tweaking will help the Dragon catch up.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Voltaire

So...what did you think of the Epic shots in Oblivion?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

To answer your question about the 10% RED shots in oblivioun, Honestly were just speaking on a technical basis of overall raw picture quality with no color grading, The f65 is amazing , but honestly the alexa and even the black magic cinema camera and f55 with proper color grading could all intercut and blend well together.

The epic and mx shots could also be blended well but sorry the former RED cameras are very nice pixel cameras and produce a very nice image good enough for production ,but they just do not simply compare to the COLOR GAMUT /SCIENCE pumping out of f65 and alexa, h3ll in black magic cinema camera .

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
jay clout

@jay

I see people say things like this all the time, but I have yet to see anyone actually prove it objectively. I call placebo.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

In "Oblivion", Epic shots, from what I've read, were only used to film clouds and then project those shots onto the massive screens that surrounded the "sky tower": http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1483013/technical?ref_=tt_dt_spec

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Voltaire

OBLIVI what?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

@Voltaire

It was also used for steadi-cam shots according to someone who worked on the film.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

"Sony F65 was used for 90% of the film, Epic was used for Steadicam, handheld, mini-heleicopter, and vehicle mount shots."

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?90898-OBLIVION-starring-Tom-...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

"I have yet to see anyone actually prove it objectively. I call placebo."

There have been quite a few times when I've watched a movie and then wondered why it look so bad. When I've checked online, those movies have invariably turned out to be shot on a Red camera.

Most recent example of this phenomenon is "Parker".

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

@Daniel

I've been surprised by how bad something looked, and then went to see what it was shot on and found it was Alexa...Hemlock Grove was the most recent one. The camera isn't the only determining factor in image quality.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

Blame the camera or the light crew and grader?

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

The best videos I've ever seen were done on Red, not on any other camera. The 6K sample above is one example. This is another:

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pSzhZ76GdM]

Really looking forward to the first movie put out using the Red Dragon!! All other cameras are now fighting it out for second place. Maybe other camera companies should leapfrog 6K and go straight to 8K. And maybe Red should already be R & D-ing an 8K. Time waits for no one.

Itn' this fun!

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

@Gene

If you're asking about Hemlock Grove, I'm not sure I'd mark it as a failure by any particular group per se...it looked to me like a stylistic grading choice that was taken waaaaay too far, so there are multiple reasons why it could've turned out the way it did. But in any case I saw a lot of bad highlight roll offs, clipped shadows, icky color casts, really bad obvious power masks, ect. It's actually probably a bullet that Game of Thrones missed...I remember reading about how they original had a really intense grade on the first season and then thankfully they realized it looked much better if they dialed the grade way back.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

I think going for a style in grading is a risk. Maybe for moments in a movie it's a good thing. But a whole movie can be a turn off. I remember Steven Spielburgh talking about making Schindlers List. He said he knew doing it in B & W was a risk. But in that particular case he didn't care. He said he made the movie selfishly, for himself, in only the way he wanted it to be. He thought it would only be shown in a few art houses. But he was so rich he thought it was at the point he could make a selfish movie and lose money. He never imagined it would make $100's of millions. Most movies makers don't have the luxury of being selfish.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

AFTER what?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

It looks impressive, but does this mean that we will now have to suffer through another few years of incessant chest beating by Red and their legion of minions?

Someone call me when the ALEXA II arrives.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Barry Lyndon

Kinda gives balance to the arrogant legion of ARRI followers...

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Zeng

It looks like a great outdoor camera ... gives RED an ability to capture and stream a bunch of 4K sun&surf videos to the subscribers of their 4K streaming service ... who will subsequently show off to their friends and frenemies with their 4K screens ... (cheap show-offs will have a $1,000 50" TCL and Seiki panels; the better heeled ones will have the $5K units from Sony and Samsung) ... and it also forces their competitors (Alexa, Canon) to stay on their toes with their product updates ...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
DLD

I am very disappointed actually. It looks very similar to an Epic Mx. This footage can be an epic- x footage easily. Highlight roll off is still not good enough. It is not as organic as an Alexa and F65. Color science is the biggest issue. It is totally not new. It is still have that RED color unpleasantness . Maybe it is because of redcode I dont know. I thought it will be ground breaking. I hoped it will be like 65mm film. But it is not. To sum up it is an Epic Mx sensor 1.2 upgrade. More resolution( which is not what we need, 6k is too much) more dynamic range. but still the unpleasant red colors and lack of cinematic look. Hd alexa with prores is still looks more cinematic than this. Buy the way I own a red too. I am not trying to be offensive. I just want to have a perfect camera from red.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Togan Gökbakar

Hi togan,

Well the thing is, this is RC3 and RG3. The current color science and gamma. The thing to remember is that it may initially appear unimpressive, because we are looking at a LUT designed for a 13 stop camera. not a 15/16 stop camera. What i would like to have seen in some of the more aggressive contrast scenes like the female surfer, and forrest, is a DPX still of REDLOGFILM.

RC3/RG3 in the current MX throws away a lot of information off the RAW as is. Thats not say it isnt there, but it just shows you a contrastier, snappier image so you instinctively protect the highlights/shadows a bit more. Thats what we are looking at. For all we know, since these are ungraded, in log there could be significantly more in the highlights. If i get my hands on a Dragon, which may happen as i may shoot a test film for RED, i will be sure to provide these kinds of tests.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply

I thought this too until I remembered Mark shot in RC3/RG3, but said he started his minimal grade from Redlogfilm.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Brian

Okay, I looked again. Some shots were RC3, we just don't know which ones. I hope that accounts for some of what we're seeing.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Brian

Red Dragon has been under development several years and there is still no new "Dragon color science" available ?

According to Jarred Land of Red, Red Dragon cameras where fully working during 2013 NAB "installation show ". That is four months ago. So Red could not get even a new beta "color science" working in four months ?

Either Red engineers are simply incredibly bad, or Jarred Land is a liar.

Which one it is ?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Juhan-i

The day you produce a 6k RAW camera, come back to me with how simple it is to engineer the software to maximize the hardware in a few months.

I don't get why people have the impression that its an easy process.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Timur Civan

Don't take Juhan serious, whenever there's a RED related thread here he shows up bashing on RED and promoting Sony (F65). God knows why.

August 25, 2013

0
Reply
hansd

You get 16 stops to play with, and you tell me that you won't be able to expose within those 16 stops so that your highlights roll off any way you like them?!

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Zeng

What Timur just said should be made very clear. this is RG3/RC3, old color science, so of course it feels similar to MX. These are pretty much ungraded test shots. I think as a first impression its pretty amazing, but we aint seen nothing yet.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
carlos

In my opinion disregard all the tech mumbo jumbo and lets wait for further future footage and base it off of overal look. As of now looks promising, but lets wait till all of the smoke clears before jumping ship

I will however say and add that the addition of 6k resolution with just 13stops would be amazing in my opinion, especially for true imax definition and not the fake imax theather branding spots, even though 2k is good enough

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
jay clout

well put - lets see some more tests and wait till the camera is actually shipping in bulk

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

looking amazing. f everyone's sarcasm and opinion. -5dIII raw user

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
cee

++1

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

wow!!! fighting between alexa and dragon!!!
i think cinema need big sensor than big resolution
something like medium format or large format

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
peshraw

There's a fight? A fight?

Just have to add up the total box office over the last few years of the 25 biggest Red titles and the 25 biggest ARRI titles to see. No fight. (R.I.P.D (ARRI) made how much?)

Red Dragon will make that difference far greater. That video is beautiful!

I'll preemptively say, don't just say 'Skyfall was shot on ARRI, and look how much it made'. Yes, ARRI has been used in a few big name movies. But Red has been used in many. Besides, Red was used in some Skyfall scenes. :-)

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Mind showing us those box office totals?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Mitch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_shot_in_digital

You can look them up and add the numbers. It's easy to see eying them up Red wins by quite a bit.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

To make it easier just add up the top 10, or top 5. Sorting through all of those to get the top 25 would take a while.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

It's not just about box office, but also the quality of the actual movie. I'm sure both have done great movies. Also, check out what are the big DP's choosing... mostly Alexa.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
R

70 titles shot on Alexa starting just a couple of years ago in 2011.
83 titles shot on Red cameras (Red One, Red One MX, Red Epic) starting all the way back in 2008.

Only 31 titles shot on Red Epic...

Seems as if most of the big name movies shooting on Epic were 3D productions. Also, there are twice as many Alexa films on that list as movies shot on the Epic, even though the cameras were released within a year of each other.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

ACTUALLY: Looking at all of the films shot on RED/ALEXA that are listed on that list, I did a little math...

Per Movie: Alexa films make a little more per film overall(they have made an average of $55 972 859.46/movie compared to Red's 51 119 104.63/movie this is less than a 10% difference so it doesn't REALLY tell us anything)

"But What about just the top movies?" you may ask.

In the top 5, 10, 15, and 20 Alexa has made more money overall, and in the top 5, 10, 15 the Alexa has made more per film.

RED however, has made more in the top 25 overall, and more per movie in the top 20 and the top 25.

Now, I am ONLY using films' local gross due to time. All of my data is from http://boxofficemojo.com/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_shot_in_digital you may look at my data here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtFk9k3kfDDodE1UajV5cDE1LUx...

Long story short: It doesn't matter. That was a good waste of an hour :)

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
David J. Fulde

That would be a good argument if people went to see a movie based on what camera the production used...

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Kenneth Merrill

My argument isn't that.

It is that those knowing how to make bigger grossing movies choose Red more often. The resolution, DR, and beauty of the Red Dragon will ensure those same people continue to use Red. And it will bring more movie makers in. Why? A little time spent seeing Red Dragon footage, and also the cost difference compared to ARRI, will likely attract some who would have been ARRI users.

I'm not saying choosing Red will automatically cause you to make more money. The horse chose the Red cart for a reason though.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

From your list:

Oz, Hobbit, Amazing Spider-Man, Prometheus, Pirates: $3.7 billion (Red)

World War Z, Life of Pi, Skyfall, Iron Man 3, Avengers: $4.9 billion (Alexa)

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

Iron Man 3 used Red too.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Most of the time these movies are shot with RED because 3d rigs are lighter if you go with RED and Post likes extra res for compositing. Plus the Alexa-M is a pain in the ass. Aside from that, I know of very few DP's that would choose a RED over an Alexa for a 2D film. I love my Epic, but I still grin whenever I get to shoot with an Alexa.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
David

Peter Jackson on Red before 3D:

[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-VeXLZTm24 ]

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

I've seen that Gene. First of all Peter Jackson isn't a DP. Second of all, he's a director that heavily relies on Visual Effects, which is made a little easier and cheaper on the RED. This was also before the Alexa even came out so it was generally Film vs. RED. The RED ONE was huge in transitioning people away from Film historically. You clearly haven't shot with both of these cameras. The Alexa simply destroys the RED ONE is basically every aspect of it's image and is way faster to work with on set. The Epic is a little better and has it's advantages here and there which I've explained before.

I'm excited about Dragon and will be upgrading my camera as soon as possible. Hopefully the new color science will better the Alexa. I'd love for the Epic to have a better out of the box look than the Alexa.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
David

Is this serious? I mean, who's gonna choose a camera because "The Hobbit" used it? I'd choose something that can deliver what I'm looking for. Because a can analyse by myself. And this kind of argument is typical of some seller in a mall.

By the way, yesterday I saw a great movie in theaters, "Hannah Arendt". I swear, as good as the movie looks, it screams "DIGITAL". Guess what? Red Epic. Looks great, but still I wouldn't use it.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Rodrigo Molinsky

This is the second time I've posted that list. I got the same reaction from people who like ARRI the first time too. I am not saying if a movie isn't a big grosser that doesn't mean it isn't good. My favorite movie in the last 10 years was The Debt. Most people have never even heard of it.

On a side note, it doesn't seem to be good math for those making movies they know won't be a big grosser to chose the most expensive camera to shoot with. But it's up to them.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Where in my statement you read "I like Alexa better than any RED camera"? I why you keep talking about movie grossing and one's favorite movies?

And why I keep trying to find some logic on this?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Rodrigo Molinsky

I think the 'filmic' look is on the way out. Digital is the new 'filmic', isn't it? Digital is hard to adjust to for people used to film. But digital has taken over. The horse is out of the barn. The train left the station. The egg's an omelet..... can't think of anymore sayings. ;-)

But digital does look fantastic in some movies. Like I said in another comment, Transformers looked incredible. It was made in digital. This new sensor looks incredible too, even better than that. In fact, it's the best looking video I've ever seen. I want a Red w/Red Dragon. Say, can you spare $50,000.00?

The only point I was trying to make in all this Red ARRI thing is that Red is making more money than ARRI. Red Dragon will move more money toward Red. Alexa will have to leapfrog 4k and get a 6K sensor muy pronto.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

So, then, why wouldn't you use Red?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Seriously, are you trying to sell me a camera? Stop, please. "The only point I was trying to make in all this Red ARRI thing is that Red is making more money than ARRI". Good for them, Jim Jannard must be very happy. And I'm only writing now because you asked me why wouldn’t I use Red.

About my choices, they'll still be my choices, subjective or not. If I'm not going to make a movie for IMAX and I have limited budget, for example, of course I'll not choose a RED, but anything like a BMCC to invest all the money I can in the art direction. That's a reason to not choose a RED camera. If I make my movie (which will NOT be another blockbuster action super hero movie) with a "RED EPIC Phoenix 10K", or whatever, and I see it in a classic street theater, where I gonna put all those pixels? Actually, I almost bought a Scarlet, but the local rental house here had some problems with the support and ultimately called it "the RED attitude" for a reason - and that's a big "no, thanks".

You're getting too much hyped by the numbers. And it's not about film anymore. Man, I loved the look of "Hugo" and I was surprised to know it was digital. With all the cameras we have now, why some respectable professionals such as Roger Deakins and Claudio Miranda prefered other camera brands in certain productions? Because they can choose something that fits better the job. That's what a professional would do. Why can't I choose something that pleased my eyes most or will be better to work with? Can you excuse me and able me to do that? Thanks.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Rodrigo Molinsky

I don't care about numbers. That wasn't my point.

Anyway, that's for the exchange. Maybe we'll exchange again some day.

Have a nice night. :-)

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Roger Deakins (DP of Skyfall) himself said he regrets having to use the red on some scenes. ;)

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Luke

That was because the guys doing the helicopter footage botched the exposure and had blown highlights (and no budget or time to reshoot), which would have been easier to recover on the Alexa. The Dragon sensor obviously means that problem is no more (unless of course you hire complete boobs to operate who don't know how to read a histogram or RED's goal posts and stop lights.)
Deakins is not a brand loyalist, he's a picture loyalist. Accidentally blown highlights are never OK.

Also - I have to say, arguing over camera quality by comparing box office returns is about as ridiculous as using box office returns to pick the caterer.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Jack Frost

"Some RED haters on Nofilmschool are now comparing box office totals to determine which camera is better between Epic and Alexa hahahahahahahahahahaha" -- Matt Ryan, @RedUser.net on 6th Aug 2013

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?103732-DRAGON-ITS-THE-REAL-D...

A-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. It was acutally Gene (a "Red lover"), who brought the subject up:

Gene on 08.4.13 @ 6:49PM:

"There’s a fight? A fight?

Just have to add up the total box office over the last few years of the 25 biggest Red titles and the 25 biggest ARRI titles to see. No fight. (R.I.P.D (ARRI) made how much?)"

When people including myself pointed out to Gene that his perception does not seem to coincidence with reaiity, it gets twisted as "Red-haters comparing box office grosses with Alexa-shot movies." No one cares which camera grossed more at the box-office (as if that could possibly make a significant difference to the success or otherwise of a movie).

It just goes to show how deluded the Red users are...

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

I'm a Red lover? I'll be leaving this mosh pit now.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

I'm waiting to see what Arri fires back with considering the fact that Alexa (with a sensor that is years old) gets 14 stops of dynamic range. It's a very exciting time to be a DP indeed.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Harry Pray IV

Hopefully they reveal something at NAB. They said that they are working on a new camera (4K) so that'll be exciting.

I've spoken with people who say "4K won't be enough by the time it comes out" people said that about the lack of resolution the Alexa had when it was announced.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
David J. Fulde

Sorry, but that simply does not look like 15/16 stops of DR. The highlight roll-off isn't pleasing either.

Sony F65 and Alexa still have a more pleasing image I believe. However, they are more expensive cameras.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Voltaire

its only one extra stop of DR in the highlights - so the f65, alexa, f55, f35, f3 still seem to have better highlight control.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

More stops in the shadows can mean more stops in the highlights...you just adjust your exposure. People did that all the time with film.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

And you're basing that off an 8-bit JPEG, are you?

Let's see the RAW files. As you can see from the video (assuming you actually have a clue what you're looking at), there's a lot of meat in there. Clean 4000 ISO and usable 6400 ISO is spectacular for any digital cinema camera, no matter how you twist your argument.

To me, this looks like the new king of the hill, bumping the Alexa for DR and skin tones and the F65 for overall IQ. Anyone who says the Dragon is a disappointment - well, I'm not sure exactly what they were expecting so I don't really know what to say. 16+ stops of DR (which is plainly obvious to anyone with experience), fantastic skin tones out of the box as well as groovy low light handling and 6K resolution to boot?!? That's ridiculously attractive at any price.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Jack Frost

Nah, the 5Diii looks better. hehe ;-)

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Ed, it's very hard to judge highlights from this H264 video, as even Toia admits its a stress test, and he wasn't grading it. Just because it's only 1 extra stop in highlights doesn't necessarily mean the roll off won't be there. Roll off is determined by the CURVE of exposure, by the lattitude in the image, so the extra DR in the Dragon will presumably help with roll off in general. I think until the new color science is in place (RC4, RG4) and everyone starts being able to play with the actual R3D's, I think this first video is just a SAMPLE of what Dragon is capable of. I think what's been lost in this discussion are the remarkable elements already clear in Toia video:

1) Amazing low light performance. See the shot of the dogs at 3:00? Shot at 4000 ISO?

2) Amazing performance even under extreme compression. See that same shot of the dogs at 3:00? That was shot at 4000 Iso, 100 fps, and at 17: compression!!! Bear in mind we ordinarily shoot at 8:1 on Epic and Scarlet now. And this looks just as good! Which means we can be shooting at 6K, and have possibly SMALLER files than we shot at 5K

3) Less rolling shutter. Dragon processes twice as fast as Epic-MX. See all the shots of the Cars sliding around the track? The wheels spinning look fantastic...and a lot of those shots are at 17:1 compression.

4) Recoverable ISO. What blew my mind was Toia shooting at 200 ISO, and then PUSHING it to 4000 iso almost no penalty. That was CRAZY!!!'

5) The dynamic range. Being able to catch that information in the highlights, but still have DEEP data in the shadows, blew my mind

6) The cleaner ISO across the board also means that shooting down at 3K and 2K will look BETTER than EVER. So all those S16mm and 16mm primes will look better than ever windowed down.

This also means that slo-mo at 300FPS will look cleaner, and better than ever.

So, there is much to celebrate and admire. And all for a $9000 upgrade if you already own Epic.

August 6, 2013

0
Reply
Nick Morrison

its 2 stops in the shadows, only one stop in the highlights so yes not as pleasing as the arri alexa and sony f35 or sony f65

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

I was thinking the same thing. Some of those shots just jump to a white blob. GRANTED: It is still freaking beautiful! however in my opinion the Alexa looks nicer.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
David J. Fulde

Highlight roll off is completely adjustable using curves...and DR in shadows can be DR in highlights, you just have to adjust your exposure (akin to underexposing and push processing film).

You can download the original .mov off Vimeo and put a quick RGB curve adjustment on it to play around with the highlight roll off.

August 7, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

Let's also remember that the Alexa has a built in low con filter...nothing's stopping anyone from putting a low con filter on their Red or any other camera out there.

August 7, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

You have obviously no idea what you are talking about because else you would know that 'highlight roll off' of a digital camera is not a valid criteria in footage lie this. 'Highlight roll off' is just a curve applied somewhen after light hit the sensor. With a raw camera like RED or Alexa or BMCC, YOU apply that curve. You create the roll off and with as much DR as Dragon has you can create very smooth roll off.

Also, you yourself choose mid grey point by the way you expose the sensor. There's no 'it has more stops of DR in the shadows than in the highlights'. Expose it differently and you'll have more stops in the highlights than the shadows.
That's the way you work with these raw cameras but obviously most people commenting here have never even worked with RED or Alexa personally.

August 8, 2013

0
Reply
hansd

I will wait until I can see something projected, but dynamic range seems nice even though the look isn't for me. Looking forward to seeing Arri's next move. Great to see competition.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Mitch

More of the same RED skins tones, casting pinkish. Yes Alexa still more pleasing for skin tones.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
John Wilton

John,
you're color blind? you can not notice any difference between mx and Dragon?
Seriously?
I sincerely hope that you are not a DP or a colorist.
It's like saying that you do not see a difference between a bmc and alexa here in the movie ..
https://vimeo.com/62832482
Try to go out with Alexa and shoot at 4000 or 6400 iso that you always manage to see something and not just noise, in real life without lights, as did Toia, with Dragon.
No one has ever had problems with your skin with Red, the only people who fail to classify the movie correctly, perhaps you are one of those.
The only problems with REd was the color temperature to 3200 that caused a lot of noise in the blue channel that was more than Alexa clean.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
francis dellera

Why the personal attack? Everyone is entitled to their opinion. More DR and a little extra resolution. Carry on ...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Tim Mcnamara

no do not be a personal attack, be an observation.
If he can take me to clean movies like Dragon with 4000 iso Alexa are happy otherwise they are meaningless words, the colors if you do not like, Raw can change a good colorist and boom do what you want. :)
Always know what it means to Raw.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
francis dellera

This guy is a troll. You can tell by the way he writes.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Bud Buck

do you have any problem Bud buck?
I mean maybe bad because they are not native English speakers, i am french.
Sorry,I just want to try to make a good discussion.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
francis dellera

Yep. Some people like that. Not me either.
I think it's very cool. Does it change the game? Um, I'll take a pause on that.
Both Sony and ARRI are whispering things, and the current Alexa has a very defined market.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Marklondon

Not too shabby.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
ronn

Not shabby indeed **pinky raised in the air** lol :P

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

I love how everyone's saying things like "Let's wait and see what Arri fires back with." as if this is an actual fight and that at the end of it only one camera will remain. I promise, if one camera ends up having better specs at a better price they won't send the camera police to grab your camera and smash it in front of you.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Coty

It's not an actual fight. It's more like a pillow fight. Between two hot chicks in lingerie. No matter who wins or loses, it still looks hot.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
DLD

Arri will fire back. It will be an immense battle.

But unseen by either of them, Sony were hovering below the cliff. They will rise up and engage both of them with 16k of power.

Arri and Red will retreat, forced to take cover in the same cave. There they will combine camera technology to take on the might of Sony -- "it's the only way we're gonna survive."

Meanwhile, all three of them will taken by surprise when Blackmagic sneak a suitcase bomb* (available now for just $1k) underneath the battlefield.

*hello NSA

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

LOL +1

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Leonardo

Haha, best comment so far. So true. It made me laugh.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
elliott felton'...

Reading many of these comments makes me sad. Where's the passion for the art? So many technology suckers waiting in line with their wallets open. So you camera doesn't have 25 stops of dynamic range... Ever heard of turning on a light and mounting a bounce board to a c-stand?

I love what digital advances have done in the film world but at the same time I mourn the artistry of shooting on celluloid and the days of true artists and storytellers who had to rely on great story and character development instead of just propping up things with spectacle and special fx (all shot in pristine 6K from this point forward...).

Feel free to trash talk me pixel obsessed trolls and RED zealots but I this is all I have to say.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Neil

It's such a double-edged sword. I'm a huge advocate of film, both for aesthetic reasons as well as metaphysical ones. However, I've never shot on anything but digital cameras, and it's quite arguable that my career is being made possible only by digital cinema and even furthermore by Red Studios. Without the Red One, we wouldn't have any of the more affordable RAW cinema cameras, and while plenty of great looking films have been shot in compressed codecs, I also appreciate the flexibility that a RAW workflow provides. In the end it can significantly reduce the cost of a production. Put on top of that the extreme ISO's we are able to shoot at these days, and not only is it extremely possible to shoot projects on a low budget, I almost have no excuse anymore :)

So yeah, digital cinema has given me opportunities I would never have had otherwise. HOWEVER, I also feel fatigued by the incessant name-calling, immature bickering, and obsessive fanboy posturing conducted by many of my young generation, especially disciples of extremely well-marketed and over-hyped companies like Red and Black Magic Design (coming from someone who plans to own both a BMPCC and a Scarlett). The "I'm right, your wrong, my camera is better than yours" attitude that pervades camera forums everywhere is tearing apart a community that should really be banding together. Alas, not everyone wants to be an artist; there is too much sacrifice involved, mostly of ego.

I'm a geek, gadget enthusiast, and pixel-peeper as much as the next guy, and I really look forward to owning my own affordable, RAW-shooting, high DR digital cinema camera, thanks to the pioneering efforts of Red Studios. I just wish people would grow up (and I need to as well, sometimes) and stop bickering over something that simply doesn't matter. It's perfectly fine to criticize a company because you think they are misrepresenting themselves or their products or pulling the wool over people's eyes. It's also fine to disagree and be ok with that company and buy they're products because you like them. Furthermore, it's fine to be unimpressed by footage, and it's fine to be impressed. But please, let's all be a little more civil to one another. We're all here for most of the same reasons. Let's enjoy that community.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Kenneth

Redcode is not raw actually. It is a compressed codec. By saying raw if you mean uncompressed raw, red is not. And you dont need to write raw in capitals like RAW. It is a marketing thing that red created. It is the same raw with 'raw meat' . As I say it is not raw. Redcode is a compressed lossy codec.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Togan Gökbakar

I knew that.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Kenneth

Raw doesn't mean uncompressed. Uncompressed means uncompressed. Most raw formats utilize compression.

Raw means the data hasn't been debayered and transformed into a color space and gamma curve.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

There is Redcode and there is Redcode raw.
Yes Redcode raw is compressed, most raw formats are.
Redcode raw is also a little lossy, which not all raw formats are.

Correct me if I'm wrong, this is just random info I picked up with my Google-fu

August 5, 2013

0
Reply

By 2014 film will be officially dead in movie theaters. Of the approximate 40,000 U.S. movie screens, 14,000 have yet to convert to digital projectors. Celluloid prints of new movies from the majors won't be available after 2013. http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Hollywood-pushes-U-S-movie-screen...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Razor

this ^^^^^

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
dixter

meant that for Neil. I agree.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
dixter

Just a friendly reminder, the footage is shot in REDcolor3 and REDgamma3 so it will look very similar to the current MX sensors. Honestly the footage looks incredible coming straight from the sensor. Especially if you have ever seen the raw footage on the appropriate display. This is just a small portion of this sensor's capabilities. I can't wait to see the sensor equipped with the new color science and graded.

I don't really see the need to defend other cameras when this is solely displaying sample footage from a new sensor. It's another incredible tool that we can rent out or purchase to bring our pictures to life.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Soular

I would love it for this camera to make it up into the ISS and capture the deep blacks of space and the astronauts doing EVA's Sounds a bit cheesy, but I imagine there would be some beautiful looking images coming back. Nonetheless, this is definitely the camera to keep an eye out for considering a 6K Workflow I'm sure has got to be fun to work with, (if you can manage the space that is...). From this first little test, I'm very pleased with the range it's capturing and looking forward for future shorts.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply

The roiding in the comments...

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Xiong

Now, the price is justified.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Sean

Don't like the color.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Bry

The next quest for Jim Jannard? How about 8K? 4K is 4x the resolution of 1080p. 8K would be 16x 1080p? That seems to be the math.

NHK already has an 8K camera and is preparing to broadcast NHK tv in 8K by 2016. So 8K, obviously, can be done.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Hmm, I don't see why anyone's complaining about the Dragon at all. It's a 6k camera head that costs $28,000.

But let's say that the Sony and Arri are still the better cameras, albeit slightly, they cost $70-$100k just for the brain

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
mr. show

It should be noted that their brains do a lot more out of the box than the epic. But still, point taken.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Kenneth Merrill

more? like prepare coffee and do the laundry?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Zeng

This may be a silly question but why do they show two F stops on one clip? For example, the second image above says Highlights F32 and forest floor F3.5. What does that mean?

August 4, 2013

0
Reply

@Dylan
I think it means that, at whatever given ISO they are using, the hi-lights would measure F32 and the shadowy area of the forest floor would measure F3.5.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
dixter

I'll wait for the next Zacuto shootout for a more objective analysis or even better yet test it myself.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Robert Hunter

If you make a comparison video I'd want to see it. Especially if it's side by side comparisons. Those reveal it all, don't they. Comparisons in succession are good, don't quite do the same.

August 4, 2013

0
Reply
Gene

Exactly.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Robert Hunter

"I’ll wait for the next Zacuto shootout for a more objective analysis"

Funny. The only point to their pointless shootouts is to promote brand Zacuto.

It was ironic that Jim Jannard complained that the last Zacuto shootout only projected in 2k, thereby "crippling" his 4k camera. He then said Dragon should only be compared from this point forth to 65mm film (when scanned at 4k), even though 65mm could be scanned at 8k or even 16k.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

It can be scanned at 8k and 16k, put can it be digitally projected or printed back to film at anything higher than 4k?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

It can be scanned at 8k and 16k, but can it be digitally projected or printed back to film at anything higher than 4k?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Gabe

There are 8k projectors available, you know. And 8k television prototypes (in Japan).

A Blu-Ray mastered at 4k looks sharper than one at 2k, even though they're both outputting 1080p. Same as a HD download of 2.5GB looks sharper than the same film on DVD at around 7GB.

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
Daniel

Going from f4 to f45 is 8 stops right? So where in this shots can we see that 16.5 stops?

August 5, 2013

0
Reply
ts

Pages