<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; 35mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/35mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Side by Side,&#039; the Film vs. Digital Documentary Produced by Keanu Reeves, is Now on Netflix</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalbolex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribeca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribecafilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribecafilminstitute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=44973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Film vs. Digital. Celluloid vs. Silicon. While the debate is beginning to die down due to economics and advancements in digital cinema cameras, a documentary on the subject called Side by Side takes a look at the issue with some of the premiere directors and cinematographers. We mentioned a few months ago that the doc, produced [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/">'Side by Side,' the Film vs. Digital Documentary Produced by Keanu Reeves, is Now on Netflix</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-27814" title="side by side documentary film" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-224x106.png" alt="" width="224" height="106" />Film vs. Digital. Celluloid vs. Silicon. While the debate is beginning to die down due to economics and advancements in digital cinema cameras, a documentary on the subject called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0090EJZA8/nofilmschool-20"><em>Side by Side</em></a> takes a look at the issue with some of the premiere directors and cinematographers. We <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/">mentioned a few months ago</a> that the doc, produced by Keanu Reeves, was available to buy, but now the film is available to watch right now on Netflix. Click through for some clips from the movie. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/#more-44973" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/">'Side by Side,' the Film vs. Digital Documentary Produced by Keanu Reeves, is Now on Netflix</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/side-by-side-film-digital-documentary-keanu-reeves-netflix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/CfguA5i_ehs" duration="61">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/CfguA5i_ehs" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[&#039;Side by Side,&#039; the Film vs. Digital Documentary Produced by Keanu Reeves, is Now on Netflix - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Film vs. Digital. Celluloid vs. Silicon. While the debate is beginning to die down due to economics and advancements in digital cinema cameras, a documentary on the subject called Side by Side takes a look at the issue with some of the premiere directors and cinematographers. We mentioned a few mon]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/side-by-side-the-film-vs-digital-documentary-produced-by-keanu-reeves-is-now-on-netflix-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,digital,digitalbolex,documentary,editing,film,projection,tribeca,tribecafilm,tribecafilminstitute</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-125x69.png" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[side by side documentary film]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-125x69.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Battle of the Bokeh&#039; Beauty Contest Blind-Tests Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Lenses</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battleofthebokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=43998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When considering lens options for purchase or rental, certain criteria may stand out to you more than others. This depends on what you shoot most often, or what a project demands. Perhaps as a run-and-gun doc shooter, you simply need the extra stop you get with one 85mm lens for the same price as another [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/">'Battle of the Bokeh' Beauty Contest Blind-Tests Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Lenses</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-44012" title="bokeh battle lenses lens camera shootout blind test" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bokeh-battle-lenses-lens-camera-shootout-blind-test-e1360821171312-224x124.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="124" />When considering lens options for purchase or rental, certain criteria may stand out to you more than others. This depends on what you shoot most often, or what a project demands. Perhaps as a run-and-gun doc shooter, you simply <em>need</em> the extra stop you get with one 85mm lens for the same price as another that doesn&#8217;t vignette as badly. Or you gave up a contrast performance you really preferred in favor of the IS lens of greater overall value. But what if money were no object, and focal length and speed were matched? An aspect you&#8217;d find yourself evaluating closely is the way each handles its bokeh, or de-focused areas of the image. DigitalRev&#8217;s latest Battle of the Bokeh is a comparison between Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm f/1.4 lenses in precisely this spirit &#8212; with some unexpected results. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/#more-43998" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/">'Battle of the Bokeh' Beauty Contest Blind-Tests Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Lenses</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/blind-test-battle-bokeh-canon-nikon-sigma-35mm-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/6uaOC-q6nP8" duration="377">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/6uaOC-q6nP8" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[&#039;Battle of the Bokeh&#039; Beauty Contest Blind-Tests Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Lenses - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[When considering lens options for purchase or rental, certain criteria may stand out to you more than others. This depends on what you shoot most often, or what a project demands. Perhaps as a run-and-gun doc shooter, you simply need the extra stop you get with one 85mm lens for the same price as an]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/battle-of-the-bokeh-beauty-contest-blind-tests-canon-nikon-and-sigma-35mm-f1-4-lenses-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,battleofthebokeh,bokeh,camera,canon,dslr,lens,lenses,nikkor,nikon,performance,shooting,shootout,sigma,test</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bokeh-battle-lenses-lens-camera-shootout-blind-test-e1360821171312-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bokeh-battle-lenses-lens-camera-shootout-blind-test-e1360821171312.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[bokeh battle lenses lens camera shootout blind test]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bokeh-battle-lenses-lens-camera-shootout-blind-test-e1360821171312-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lomography&#039;s New &#039;Purple&#039; Color Negative 35mm Film Stock, Inspired by Kodak&#039;s Infrared Aerochrome</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filmstock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=42894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lomography is both an analog-based film movement as well as a manufacturer of specialty products conducive to such an activity &#8212; these include the LomoKino 35mm stills-to-motion camera and the (successfully) Kickstarted Smartphone Film Scanner app/device. Lomography&#8217;s goods aren&#8217;t for everybody, or every project &#8212; but the company has some exciting news for the analog [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/">Lomography's New 'Purple' Color Negative 35mm Film Stock, Inspired by Kodak's Infrared Aerochrome</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-42948" title="lomography lomochrome color negative kodak aerochrome infrared ir 35mm 120 film stock celluloid 2" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lomography-lomochrome-color-negative-kodak-aerochrome-infrared-ir-35mm-120-film-stock-celluloid-2-224x147.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="147" /><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/lomography/">Lomography </a>is both an analog-based film movement as well as a manufacturer of specialty products conducive to such an activity &#8212; these include the LomoKino 35mm stills-to-motion camera and the (successfully) Kickstarted <a title="New Lomography Kickstarter Makes Your Smartphone a Mobile Film Scanner" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/smartphone-film-scanner-lomography-kickstarter/">Smartphone Film Scanner app/device</a>. Lomography&#8217;s goods aren&#8217;t for everybody, or every project &#8212; but the company has some exciting news for the analog enthusiast in all of us, especially while production of 35mm film seems to be <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/">slowing down</a><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/lomography/">.</a> Lomography will be releasing a new ISO 400 35mm color negative stock called LomoChrome Purple, inspired by the surreal quality of Kodak&#8217;s discontinued Aerochrome infrared stock &#8212; read on to check out the details.<a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/lomography/"> </a><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/#more-42894" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/">Lomography's New 'Purple' Color Negative 35mm Film Stock, Inspired by Kodak's Infrared Aerochrome</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/02/lomography-35mm-film-kodak-infrared-aerochrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/a1NVgOBlIas" duration="319">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/a1NVgOBlIas" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Lomography&#039;s New &#039;Purple&#039; Color Negative 35mm Film Stock, Inspired by Kodak&#039;s Infrared Aerochrome - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Lomography is both an analog-based film movement as well as a manufacturer of specialty products conducive to such an activity -- these include the LomoKino 35mm stills-to-motion camera and the (successfully) Kickstarted Smartphone Film Scanner app/device. Lomography&#039;s goods aren&#039;t for everybody, or]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lomographys-new-purple-color-negative-35mm-film-stock-inspired-by-kodaks-infrared-aerochrome-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,analog,film,filmstock,lomography,still,stock</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lomography-lomochrome-color-negative-kodak-aerochrome-infrared-ir-35mm-120-film-stock-celluloid-2-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lomography-lomochrome-color-negative-kodak-aerochrome-infrared-ir-35mm-120-film-stock-celluloid-2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[lomography lomochrome color negative kodak aerochrome infrared ir 35mm 120 film stock celluloid 2]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lomography-lomochrome-color-negative-kodak-aerochrome-infrared-ir-35mm-120-film-stock-celluloid-2-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-Watch Excerpt from Lynne Ramsay&#039;s Hauntingly Beautiful Black and White 35mm Film &#039;Swimmer&#039;</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortfilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=32313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not often that an excerpt of a film is enough to satisfy me, but that was exactly the case with a clip from Lynne Ramsay&#8217;s (Ratcatcher, Morvern Callar, We Need to Talk About Kevin) short film Swimmer. As part of the 2012 Olympics, a number of British filmmakers were commissioned to make films, and [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/">Must-Watch Excerpt from Lynne Ramsay's Hauntingly Beautiful Black and White 35mm Film 'Swimmer'</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-32314" title="Lynne Ramsay - Swimmer - Excerpt from Short Film" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Lynne-Ramsay-Swimmer-Excerpt-from-Short-Film-224x125.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="125" />It&#8217;s not often that an excerpt of a film is enough to satisfy me, but that was exactly the case with a clip from Lynne Ramsay&#8217;s (<em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000069CF9/?tag=nofilmschool-20">Ratcatcher</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0004Z32JC/?tag=nofilmschool-20">Morvern Callar</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0083GQKQG/?tag=nofilmschool-20">We Need to Talk About Kevin</a></em>) short film <em>Swimmer</em>. As part of the 2012 Olympics, a number of British filmmakers were commissioned to make films, and they were shown before the games in London earlier this year. While it doesn&#8217;t seem like all of them have been released in full anywhere else, if you did happen to see them, I just might be a little jealous, especially since the excerpt from Ramsay&#8217;s gorgeous black and white 35mm short film is so enticing. Click through to check it out. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/#more-32313" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/">Must-Watch Excerpt from Lynne Ramsay's Hauntingly Beautiful Black and White 35mm Film 'Swimmer'</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/lynne-ramsay-black-and-white-35mm-short-film-swimmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/Erg3jVETuio" duration="63">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/Erg3jVETuio" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Must-Watch Excerpt from Lynne Ramsay&#039;s Hauntingly Beautiful Black and White 35mm Film &#039;Swimmer&#039; - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[It&#039;s not often that an excerpt of a film is enough to satisfy me, but that was exactly the case with a clip from Lynne Ramsay&#039;s (Ratcatcher, Morvern Callar, We Need to Talk About Kevin) short film Swimmer. As part of the 2012 Olympics, a number of British filmmakers were commissioned to make films, ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/must-watch-excerpt-from-lynne-ramsays-hauntingly-beautiful-black-and-white-35mm-film-swimmer-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,celluloid,short,shortfilm,shorts,watch</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Lynne-Ramsay-Swimmer-Excerpt-from-Short-Film-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Lynne-Ramsay-Swimmer-Excerpt-from-Short-Film.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Lynne Ramsay - Swimmer - Excerpt from Short Film]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Lynne-Ramsay-Swimmer-Excerpt-from-Short-Film-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cinematography of &#039;American Horror Story: Asylum&#039; Uses Classic Tools to Terrify in 35mm</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ahsfx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americanhorrorstory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=32015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you didn&#8217;t watch last year&#8217;s premiere of FX networks&#8217; American Horror Story, you missed out on some seriously daring television. There was sex (and scandal), there were scares (and some blood-splatter), and there were spirits &#8212; though which characters were truly flesh-and-blood and which were a bit more ghostly didn&#8217;t become clear until much later [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/">Cinematography of 'American Horror Story: Asylum' Uses Classic Tools to Terrify in 35mm</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-full wp-image-32019" title="american horror story asylum ahsfx" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/american-horror-story-asylum-ahsfx.jpg" alt="" width="214" height="116" />If you didn&#8217;t watch last year&#8217;s premiere of FX networks&#8217; <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005SZAEYO">American Horror Story</a></em>, you missed out on some seriously daring television. There was sex (and scandal), there were scares (and some blood-splatter), and there were spirits &#8212; though which characters were truly flesh-and-blood and which were a bit more ghostly didn&#8217;t become clear until much later  &#8211; all in the context of an addicting melodrama. The series (created by <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pilot/dp/B0018760SK/">Nip/Tuck</a> </em>and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pilot-Directors-Cut/dp/B002962RKE/">Glee</a> </em>masterminds <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0614682/">Ryan Murphy</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1004299/">Brad Falchuk</a>) recently began <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Welcome-to-Briarcliff/dp/B009SJ46EA/">its second season</a> with some cast-members returning (to play different roles), but the setting has been moved to a darkly-imagined Massachusetts mental institution. One vital piece of the puzzle that is <em>AHS</em> is its look, which is being achieved on 35mm film &#8212; especially notable when FX&#8217;s own <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pilot/dp/B001F6ZIXC/">Sons of Anarchy</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pilot/dp/B003AYU25G/">Justified</a></em>, for instance, have opted for <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/alexa/">Alexa</a> and <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/red/">EPIC</a> respectively. Courtesy <em>American Cinematographer</em>, here&#8217;s a look at the shooting style of this aggressively original program &#8212; and just in time for the show&#8217;s Halloween episode premiere! <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/#more-32015" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/">Cinematography of 'American Horror Story: Asylum' Uses Classic Tools to Terrify in 35mm</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/cinematography-american-horror-story-fx-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/7h8hKMg5Ej0" duration="199">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/7h8hKMg5Ej0" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Cinematography of &#039;American Horror Story: Asylum&#039; Uses Classic Tools to Terrify in 35mm - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[If you didn&#039;t watch last year&#039;s premiere of FX networks&#039; American Horror Story, you missed out on some seriously daring television. There was sex (and scandal), there were scares (and some blood-splatter), and there were spirits -- though which characters were truly flesh-and-blood and which were a]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/cinematography-of-american-horror-story-asylum-uses-classic-tools-to-terrify-in-35mm-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,ahsfx,americanhorrorstory,cinematography,super35,television,tv</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/american-horror-story-asylum-ahsfx-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/american-horror-story-asylum-ahsfx.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[american horror story asylum ahsfx]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/american-horror-story-asylum-ahsfx-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuji Ceasing Motion Picture Film Production, Kodak is on Life Support. Is Celluloid Done For?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=29763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>About a year ago, the last motion picture film camera rolled off the assembly line, marking a historic day in film history. Now we have Fujifilm deciding that it will no longer be producing motion picture film, and Kodak is continuing its bankruptcy proceedings, selling off its still photography division, and ending its printer business. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/">Fuji Ceasing Motion Picture Film Production, Kodak is on Life Support. Is Celluloid Done For?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-29764 style-off" title="logo_Fujifilm_Logo" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/logo_Fujifilm_Logo-224x37.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="37" />About a year ago, <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/">the last motion picture film camera rolled off the assembly line</a>, marking a historic day in film history. Now we have Fujifilm deciding that it will no longer be producing motion picture film, and Kodak is continuing its bankruptcy proceedings, selling off its still photography division, and ending its printer business. Just five years ago, the idea that motion picture film may be going the way of the dinosaur was unimaginable. Sure, <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/red/">RED had come along</a> and given us the first real glimpse of the true digital replacement, but the technology still seemed a long ways off. With the economic downturn &#8212; and certainly some mismanagement along the way &#8212; Kodak was the first to show signs of danger, and now Fuji sees the writing on the wall, and is getting out of the game before it&#8217;s too late. But what else will contribute to the demise of film? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/#more-29763" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/">Fuji Ceasing Motion Picture Film Production, Kodak is on Life Support. Is Celluloid Done For?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/fuji-ceasing-film-production-kodak-on-life-support-is-celluloid-done-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/logo_Fujifilm_Logo-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/logo_Fujifilm_Logo.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[logo_Fujifilm_Logo]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/logo_Fujifilm_Logo-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keanu Reeves and Tribeca Doc &#039;Side by Side&#039; Asks: Digital vs. Film, Which Side Are You On?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Dewhurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalbolex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribeca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribecafilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribecafilminstitute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=27658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Digital vs film. It&#8217;s the debate of our generation of filmmakers, and one we&#8217;ve all heard before. Some rave about the advances in digital technology and the convenience factor. Some lament the non-organic look of digital, or the fact that the on-set workflow has changed from artistry to assembly.  There are merits to both of [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/">Keanu Reeves and Tribeca Doc 'Side by Side' Asks: Digital vs. Film, Which Side Are You On?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-27814" title="side by side documentary film" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-224x106.png" alt="" width="224" height="106" />Digital vs film. It&#8217;s the debate of our generation of filmmakers, and one we&#8217;ve all heard before. Some rave about the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/red-dragon-update-jim-jannard-iso-2000/">advances in digital technology</a> and the convenience factor. Some lament the non-organic <a title="Blackmagic Cinema Camera Gets Its First Real Low-Light Test. Watch Footage from 'Afterglow'" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/blackmagic-cinema-camera-first-low-light-test-footage-from-afterglow/">look of digital</a>, or the fact that the on-set workflow has changed from artistry to assembly.  There are merits to both of these arguments, and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0090EJZA8/?tag=nofilmschool-20">in the new documentary <em>Side by Side</em></a> from Producer (yes, Producer) Keanu Reeves, these arguments are explored and commented on. Click through for a great trailer featuring some of your favorite filmmakers (Scorsese, Lynch, Rodriguez, Nolan) weighing in on the debate. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/#more-27658" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/">Keanu Reeves and Tribeca Doc 'Side by Side' Asks: Digital vs. Film, Which Side Are You On?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/08/keanu-reeves-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/3IdzBcpr1A4" duration="106">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/3IdzBcpr1A4" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Keanu Reeves and Tribeca Doc &#039;Side by Side&#039; Asks: Digital vs. Film, Which Side Are You On? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Digital vs film. It&#039;s the debate of our generation of filmmakers, and one we&#039;ve all heard before. Some rave about the advances in digital technology and the convenience factor. Some lament the non-organic look of digital, or the fact that the on-set workflow has changed from artistry to assembly.  ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/keanu-reeves-and-tribeca-doc-side-by-side-asks-digital-vs-film-which-side-are-you-on-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,digital,digitalbolex,documentary,editing,film,projection,tribeca,tribecafilm,tribecafilminstitute</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-125x69.png" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[side by side documentary film]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/side-by-side-documentary-film-125x69.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Moving Takahashi&#039; is a Moving 35mm Short from Josh Soskin</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortoftheweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=21077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week we had the terrific short film Rest. The guys over at Short of the Week, Jason Sondhi and Andrew S Allen, are not only ambitious, but have some great taste. At NoFilmSchool we&#8217;ve covered them before with their animated short The Thomas Beale Cipher. If you haven&#8217;t seen it you should drop what [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/">'Moving Takahashi' is a Moving 35mm Short from Josh Soskin</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-21078" title="Moving Takahashi - Short" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Moving-Takahashi-Short-224x141.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="141" />Last week <a title="'Rest' is a Zombie Film That's Not a Zombie Film, Connecting with an Audience is What Matters" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/rest-zombie-film/">we had the terrific short film</a> <em>Rest</em>. The guys over at <a href="http://www.shortoftheweek.com/">Short of the Week</a>, <a title="Posts by Jason Sondhi" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2316153/" rel="author">Jason Sondhi</a> and <a href="http://www.andrewsallen.com/">Andrew S Allen</a>, are not only ambitious, but have some great taste. At NoFilmSchool <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/short-weeks-the-thomas-beale-cipher/">we&#8217;ve covered them before</a> with their animated short <em><a href="http://vimeo.com/19115071">The Thomas Beale Cipher</a></em>. If you haven&#8217;t seen it you should drop what you&#8217;re doing and watch it, and then come back here and <a href="http://www.shortoftheweek.com/2012/02/14/moving-takahashi/">check out this short</a>, <em>Moving Takahashi</em>, that centers around a mover and a suicidal rich girl. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/#more-21077" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/">'Moving Takahashi' is a Moving 35mm Short from Josh Soskin</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/moving-takahashi-josh-soskin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=36731248" duration="691">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=36731248" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[&#039;Moving Takahashi&#039; is a Moving 35mm Short from Josh Soskin - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Last week we had the terrific short film Rest. The guys over at Short of the Week, Jason Sondhi and Andrew S Allen, are not only ambitious, but have some great taste. At NoFilmSchool we&#039;ve covered them before with their animated short The Thomas Beale Cipher. If you haven&#039;t seen it you should drop w]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/moving-takahashi-is-a-moving-35mm-short-from-josh-soskin-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,shortoftheweek,shorts</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Moving-Takahashi-Short-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Moving-Takahashi-Short.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Moving Takahashi - Short]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Moving-Takahashi-Short-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>After 123 Years, Motion Picture Film Cameras Go Out of Production</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=15416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Film is beautiful. It&#8217;s going to be around for years to come. Plenty of feature films and TV shows are still being shot on film, and used film cameras will remain a viable rental market for a long time. But in the last several months, the major manufacturers of motion picture cameras &#8212; ARRI, Panavision [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/">After 123 Years, Motion Picture Film Cameras Go Out of Production</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916-224x138.jpg" alt="" title="240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916" width="224" height="138" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-15509" />Film is beautiful. It&#8217;s going to be around for years to come. Plenty of feature films and TV shows are still being shot on film, and used film cameras will remain a viable rental market for a long time. But in the last several months, the major manufacturers of motion picture cameras &#8212; ARRI, Panavision and Aaton &#8212; have all <a href="http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/film-fading-to-black">ceased production of film cameras</a>. Celluloid, you&#8217;ve had a great 123-year run. So long, and thanks for all the fish! <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/#more-15416" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/">After 123 Years, Motion Picture Film Cameras Go Out of Production</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/10/rumors-films-demise-longer-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=25378435" duration="1038">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=25378435" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[After 123 Years, Motion Picture Film Cameras Go Out of Production - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Film is beautiful. It&#039;s going to be around for years to come. Plenty of feature films and TV shows are still being shot on film, and used film cameras will remain a viable rental market for a long time. But in the last several months, the major manufacturers of motion picture cameras -- ARRI, Panavi]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/after-123-years-motion-picture-film-cameras-go-out-of-production-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>35mm,celluloid,cinematography,digital,film</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/240px-Mary_Pickford_on_Beach_with_Camera_ca_1916-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redrock Micro Releases M3 35mm Lens Adapter. Does Anyone Still Use a 35mm Adapter?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redrockmicro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=8289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Redrock Micro has launched their M3 35mm Lens Adapter, billed as &#8220;the definitive 35mm lens adapter for achieving remarkable film look with your existing video camera.&#8221; However, the first question that comes to my mind is why anyone would spend $1,320 on a 35mm lens adapter when the same amount of money could get you [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/">Redrock Micro Releases M3 35mm Lens Adapter. Does Anyone Still Use a 35mm Adapter?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/23.jpg" alt="" title="23" width="125" height="86" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-8377 style-off" />Redrock Micro has launched their M3 35mm Lens Adapter, billed as &#8220;the definitive 35mm lens adapter for achieving remarkable film look with your existing video camera.&#8221; However, the first question that comes to my mind is why anyone would spend $1,320 on a 35mm lens adapter when the same amount of money could get you a quality DSLR with an actual large sensor (like, say, the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/canon60d">Canon 60D</a>). No matter how good a 35mm adapter is, it is not going to offer you the low-light sensitivity of a true large sensor. Seeing this reasoning, Redrock has attempted to answer this HDSLR question: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/#more-8289" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/">Redrock Micro Releases M3 35mm Lens Adapter. Does Anyone Still Use a 35mm Adapter?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/11/redrock-micro-releases-m3-35mm-lens-adapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/23-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/23.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[23]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/23-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
