<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imageprocessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodaks1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirrorless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=40696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-42211 style-off" title="could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-224x145.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="145" />In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, <strong>branding</strong> can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from bankruptcy &#8212; but it&#8217;s a start. Polaroid, Technicolor, and Kodak are prime examples of this interplay, and each is adapting in its own ways &#8212; though there&#8217;s some overlap. Not one, but <em>two</em> of these traditionally film-based companies are even releasing digital cameras. In whatever the way, each of the three is working toward the preservation of its own historic brand name &#8212; which do you think will pull through? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#more-40696" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" duration="490">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#039;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#039;the new&#039; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memor]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-with-the-branded-beast-extinct-what-becomes-of-the-brand-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>brand,branding,camera,celluloid,film,imageprocessing,kodak,kodaks1,m43,mft,micro43,mirrorless,polaroid,s1,software,technicolor,video</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
