<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; footage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/footage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:24:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blender Foundation Releases 4TB of &#039;Tears of Steel&#039; Sony F65 4K Footage &amp; Demonstrates Post Workflow</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/04/blender-4tb-tears-steel-sony-f65-4k-footage/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/04/blender-4tb-tears-steel-sony-f65-4k-footage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behindthescenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tearsofsteel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=48369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blender Foundation is constantly pushing the boundaries of availability, openness, and access to the raw materials it uses to create its &#8216;proof-of-Blender&#8217; animated shorts. This type of access is usually more associated with open source software than filmmaking, but especially since the Project Mango live-action CGI/VFX-heavy  Tears of Steel was realized, that distinction has [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-29699" title="Tears of Steel - Robot Still image" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Tears-of-Steel-Robot-Still-image-224x93.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="93" />The <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/blender/">Blender Foundation</a> is constantly pushing the boundaries of availability, openness, and access to the raw materials it uses to create its &#8216;proof-of-Blender&#8217; animated shorts. This type of access is usually more associated with open source software than filmmaking, but especially <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/09/tears-of-steel-completely-open-source-film/">since the Project Mango live-action CGI/VFX-heavy  <em>Tears of Steel</em> was realized</a>, that distinction has become increasingly blurred. Now filmmakers, animators, or compositors looking to cut their teeth on professional-grade material have access to the entirety of <em>Tears of Steel</em>&#8216;s footage, in 4k OpenEXR (in the ACES color space), courtesy Xiph.org. In the meantime, the Foundation has also made available a number of resources concerning their post-production pipeline, which allowed them to transcode 4K Sony F65 footage to those Linux-workable OpenEXR frames. Check below for more details. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/04/blender-4tb-tears-steel-sony-f65-4k-footage/#more-48369" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/04/blender-4tb-tears-steel-sony-f65-4k-footage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/PR_utIj7Rmo" duration="261">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/PR_utIj7Rmo" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Blender Foundation Releases 4TB of &#039;Tears of Steel&#039; Sony F65 4K Footage &#38; Demonstrates Post Workflow - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[The Blender Foundation is constantly pushing the boundaries of availability, openness, and access to the raw materials it uses to create its &#039;proof-of-Blender&#039; animated shorts. This type of access is usually more associated with open source software than filmmaking, but especially since the Project ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/blender-foundation-releases-4tb-of-tears-of-steel-sony-f65-4k-footage-demonstrates-post-workflow-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>4k,behindthescenes,blender,bts,download,f65,footage,opensource,raw,sony,sonyf65,tearsofsteel,watch</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Tears-of-Steel-Robot-Still-image-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Tears-of-Steel-Robot-Still-image.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Tears of Steel - Robot Still image]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Tears-of-Steel-Robot-Still-image-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grab Some 4K Canon 1D C DSLR Sample Footage, and Check Out a Possible FCPX Workflow</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/4k-canon-1d-c-sample-footage-planet5d/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/4k-canon-1d-c-sample-footage-planet5d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1dc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1dx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon1dc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon1dx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color-correction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorcorrection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorgrading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eos1dc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcpx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finalcut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finalcutpro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finalcutprox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motionjpeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet5d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=40613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon&#8217;s 4K video capable DSLR, the EOS-1D C, has marked an upset for the DSLR industry &#8212; and in more ways than one. Many feel that the addition of Motion-JPEG alone is not worth the camera&#8217;s $12K price point. This is particularly the case when weighing in controversial speculation that internally it&#8217;s mostly identical to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-21758 style-off" title="Canon_EOS1DC_Angle" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Canon_EOS1DC_Angle-e1356437073819-224x240.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="192" />Canon&#8217;s 4K video capable DSLR, the EOS-1D C, has <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-4k-dslr-1d-c-hybrid-photo-video-camera/">marked an upset for the DSLR industry</a> &#8212; and in <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/canon-legal-team-modify-hack-firmware-1d-x-1d-c/">more ways than one</a>. Many feel that the addition of Motion-JPEG alone is not worth <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/canon1dc">the camera&#8217;s $12K price point</a>. This is particularly the case when weighing in controversial <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/is-the-canon-1d-c-the-twin-of-the-canon-1d-x/">speculation that internally it&#8217;s mostly identical</a> to its <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/827036-REG/Canon_5253B002_EOS_1D_X_EOS_Digital.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">$7K 1080p sibling, the 1D X</a> &#8212; and the fact that Canon is likely <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/canon-legal-team-modify-hack-firmware-1d-x-1d-c/">anticipating with gritted teeth the possibility of firmware hacks</a> 4K-ifying the 1D X. That said, it could be <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-4k-dslr-1d-c-hybrid-photo-video-camera/">a near-perfect blend of features</a> depending on your application. If this is the case for you, but you want the chance to check out or grade some full-res video footage before pulling the trigger, you&#8217;re in luck &#8212; planet5D has just posted some downloadable 1D C 4K footage for your viewing consideration (assuming of course your machine can handle it). <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/4k-canon-1d-c-sample-footage-planet5d/#more-40613" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/4k-canon-1d-c-sample-footage-planet5d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/VlQwiBS_Ef4" duration="441">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/VlQwiBS_Ef4" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Grab Some 4K Canon 1D C DSLR Sample Footage, and Check Out a Possible FCPX Workflow - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Canon&#039;s 4K video capable DSLR, the EOS-1D C, has marked an upset for the DSLR industry -- and in more ways than one. Many feel that the addition of Motion-JPEG alone is not worth the camera&#039;s $12K price point. This is particularly the case when weighing in controversial speculation that internally i]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/grab-some-4k-canon-1d-c-dslr-sample-footage-and-check-out-a-possible-fcpx-workflow-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>1dc,1dx,4k,canon,canon1dc,canon1dx,color-correction,colorcorrection,colorgrading,download,dslr,editing,eos1dc,fcpx,finalcut,finalcutpro,finalcutprox,footage,motionjpeg,planet5d</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Canon_EOS1DC_Angle-e1356437073819-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Canon_EOS1DC_Angle-e1356437073819.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Canon_EOS1DC_Angle]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Canon_EOS1DC_Angle-e1356437073819-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FS700 Price Confirmed - It&#039;s Under $10k, but by Just How Much?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/05/fs700-price-confirmed-its-10k-much/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/05/fs700-price-confirmed-its-10k-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E.M. Taboada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fs700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=22762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Sony&#8217;s FS700 camera was first announced, it was rumored to be under $10k, with some folks pegging it at $8k.  When the European version&#8217;s price came out at roughly 8,000 euros (~$10,500) the promise of being under $10,000 transformed into &#8220;probably around $10,000&#8243;.  So what am I going on about?  Well, the price has [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-21302 style-off" title="sony_nexfs700_body" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sony_nexfs700_body-224x129.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="129" />When Sony&#8217;s FS700 camera <a title="Sony's New FS-700 Revealed - 4K-ready Super 35mm Camcorder for Less Than $10k?" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/04/sonys-fs-700-revealed-4k-ready-super/">was first announced</a>, it was rumored to be under $10k, with some folks pegging it at $8k.  When the European version&#8217;s price came out at roughly 8,000 euros (~$10,500) the promise of being under $10,000 transformed into &#8220;probably around $10,000&#8243;.  So what am I going on about?  Well, the price has finally been confirmed in the U.S., and it&#8217;s just as hoped for &#8212; <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/853273-REG/Sony_NEX_FS700_4K_Ready_High_Speed.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">$8,000 dollars </a>for the camera body, or <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/853660-REG/Sony_NEX_FS700UK_NEX_FS700UK_Super35_Camcorder_with.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">$8,600 with an E-mount zoom lens</a>.  With this announcement, I figure it&#8217;s a nice moment to check out some more test videos shot with the camera that look at how well it handles whip pans, high contrast lighting, auto-focusing situations and more: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/05/fs700-price-confirmed-its-10k-much/#more-22762" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/05/fs700-price-confirmed-its-10k-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=41323029" duration="702">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=41323029" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[FS700 Price Confirmed - It&#039;s Under $10k, but by Just How Much? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[When Sony&#039;s FS700 camera was first announced, it was rumored to be under $10k, with some folks pegging it at $8k.  When the European version&#039;s price came out at roughly 8,000 euros (~$10,500) the promise of being under $10,000 transformed into &#34;probably around $10,000&#34;.  So what am I going on abou]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/fs700-price-confirmed-its-under-10k-but-by-just-how-much-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>footage,fs700,pricing,sony,test</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sony_nexfs700_body-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sony_nexfs700_body.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[sony_nexfs700_body]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/sony_nexfs700_body-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Understanding the C300&#039; - a Guide That Translates the Specs into Footage</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/understanding-numbers-guide-c300/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/understanding-numbers-guide-c300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E.M. Taboada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaallaszlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=20512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When looking at cameras, it&#8217;s easy to get caught up in the numbers game &#8212; is the footage 4:4:4; how many stops of latitude does it have; will it output raw?  These features and numbers are important, but it&#8217;s easy to forget what they mean, and how they actually impact your footage.  It doesn&#8217;t help [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-17623 style-off" title="canon c300" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/canon-c300-224x193.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="193" />When looking at cameras, it&#8217;s easy to get caught up in the numbers game &#8212; is the footage 4:4:4; how many stops of latitude does it have; will it output raw?  These features and numbers are important, but it&#8217;s easy to forget what they mean, and how they actually impact your footage.  It doesn&#8217;t help that it can be hard to get your hands on original files with full shooting details, instead of compressed internet versions that may have been corrected three ways till Sunday.  With this in mind, Gaal Laszlo has put up an informative and interesting guide to the Canon C300 that aims to show just how the numbers play out in actual footage &#8212; he has included original files for download and comparison, along with a great and detailed explanation: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/understanding-numbers-guide-c300/#more-20512" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/03/understanding-numbers-guide-c300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/canon-c300-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/canon-c300.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[canon c300]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/canon-c300-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#039;s the First Footage from a RED SCARLET-X.</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/first-footage-red-scarlet-x/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/first-footage-red-scarlet-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarletx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tonacitran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=16484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of people have asked about the wisdom behind ordering a camera sight unseen. But the RED SCARLET-X is essentially the same camera as the existing RED EPIC, with the APS-C sensor crop of a RED ONE (virtually the same as a Canon 7D) instead of the larger APS-H size of the 5K EPIC. Still, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/red-scarlet-x-footage-224x93.jpg" alt="" title="red scarlet-x footage" width="224" height="93" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-16490" />Plenty of people have asked about the wisdom behind <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/im-ordering-scarlet-x-some-clarifications/">ordering a camera sight unseen</a>. But the RED SCARLET-X is essentially the same camera as the existing <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/redepic">RED EPIC</a>, with the APS-C sensor crop of a RED ONE (virtually the same as a Canon 7D) instead of the larger APS-H size of the 5K EPIC. Still, there&#8217;s been a clamor to see the first RED SCARLET-X footage, and <a href="http://tonacitran.com/">Tonaci Tran</a> has just done the honors. Here are the first <del datetime="2011-11-29T17:47:53+00:00">two</del> three clips: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/first-footage-red-scarlet-x/#more-16484" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/first-footage-red-scarlet-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=32843511" duration="30">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=32843511" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the First Footage from a RED SCARLET-X. - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Plenty of people have asked about the wisdom behind ordering a camera sight unseen. But the RED SCARLET-X is essentially the same camera as the existing RED EPIC, with the APS-C sensor crop of a RED ONE (virtually the same as a Canon 7D) instead of the larger APS-H size of the 5K EPIC. Still, there&#039;]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/heres-the-first-footage-from-a-red-scarlet-x-nofilmschool-224x126.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>footage,red,scarletx,tonacitran</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/red-scarlet-x-footage-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/red-scarlet-x-footage.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[red scarlet-x footage]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/red-scarlet-x-footage-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
