<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; gamma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/gamma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>With Film Dead or Dying, Can You Still Get the 80s or 90s Wide Open Low Light Look?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalcinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filmgrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystertrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robbymuller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=40548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Film is going the way of other elegant, exotic, but evolutionarily condemned creatures such as the Tasmanian Tiger, the Dodo bird, and the Macarena. Somehow chart the decline of film use against the rise of digital and you&#8217;ll hear a lot about &#8216;how to make digital look like film&#8217; in your research. It&#8217;s almost an [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/">With Film Dead or Dying, Can You Still Get the 80s or 90s Wide Open Low Light Look?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-40553" title="mystery train jim jarmusch robby muller cinematography film digital 35mm 80s 90s look wide open lens lenses low light" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/mystery-train-jim-jarmusch-robby-muller-cinematography-film-digital-35mm-80s-90s-look-wide-open-lens-lenses-low-light-224x126.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="126" />Film is going the way of other elegant, exotic, but evolutionarily condemned creatures such as the Tasmanian Tiger, the Dodo bird, and the Macarena. Somehow chart the decline of film use against the rise of digital and you&#8217;ll hear a lot about &#8216;how to make digital look like film&#8217; in your research. It&#8217;s almost an existential crisis for shooters of our transitional generation, and the heart of digital&#8217;s identity crisis. If film <em>is</em> the look of cinema, what&#8217;s the key ingredient? Resolution? Latitude &#8212; or worse, light response curve? Motion transfer? Color reproduction? Or should we just let &#8220;the digital look&#8221; evolve into its own beast altogether? That&#8217;s a lot of heavy questions for a Sunday afternoon read, but ones unavoidably raised by a post from Art Adams of Pro Video Coalition about the wide open lensed and low light look of &#8217;80&#8242;s and &#8217;90&#8242;s films. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/#more-40548" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/">With Film Dead or Dying, Can You Still Get the 80s or 90s Wide Open Low Light Look?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/film-dead-80s-90s-wide-open-low-light-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/6z9z1JtjWcI" duration="53">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/6z9z1JtjWcI" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[With Film Dead or Dying, Can You Still Get the 80s or 90s Wide Open Low Light Look? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Film is going the way of other elegant, exotic, but evolutionarily condemned creatures such as the Tasmanian Tiger, the Dodo bird, and the Macarena. Somehow chart the decline of film use against the rise of digital and you&#039;ll hear a lot about &#039;how to make digital look like film&#039; in your research. It]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/with-film-dead-or-dying-can-you-still-get-the-80s-or-90s-wide-open-low-light-look-nofilmschool.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>camera,cinematography,digital,digitalcinema,film,filmgrain,gamma,lighting,lowlight,mystertrain,robbymuller</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/mystery-train-jim-jarmusch-robby-muller-cinematography-film-digital-35mm-80s-90s-look-wide-open-lens-lenses-low-light-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/mystery-train-jim-jarmusch-robby-muller-cinematography-film-digital-35mm-80s-90s-look-wide-open-lens-lenses-low-light.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[mystery train jim jarmusch robby muller cinematography film digital 35mm 80s 90s look wide open lens lenses low light]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/mystery-train-jim-jarmusch-robby-muller-cinematography-film-digital-35mm-80s-90s-look-wide-open-lens-lenses-low-light-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Gamma Issues Can Change the Look of Your DSLR Footage in Different Players</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vlcplayer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=25547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gamma issues are the bane of any filmmaker&#8217;s existence. It&#8217;s difficult to keep everything consistent when different editors and even different video players decode gamma and affect the brightness/contrast of the video you&#8217;re trying to play. We&#8217;ve talked a little bit about these issues before, and Apple has been one the biggest offenders in terms [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/">How Gamma Issues Can Change the Look of Your DSLR Footage in Different Players</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-25559" title="DSLR Video Player Comparison" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/DSLR-Video-Player-Comparison-224x132.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="132" />Gamma issues are the bane of any filmmaker&#8217;s existence. It&#8217;s difficult to keep everything consistent when different editors and even different video players decode gamma and affect the brightness/contrast of the video you&#8217;re trying to play. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/">We&#8217;ve talked a little bit</a> about <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/08/top-quality-dslr-plugin-5dtorgb-version/">these issues before</a>, and <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/">Apple has been one the biggest offenders</a> in terms of inconsistent gamma, from Quicktime 7, to Quicktime 10, to Final Cut Pro 7. Tony Reale, <a href="http://www.nextwavedv.com/analyze-the-frame-reviewing-your-video-footage-on-your-computer/">over at NextWaveDV</a>, takes a look at these issues within the Windows platform. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/#more-25547" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/">How Gamma Issues Can Change the Look of Your DSLR Footage in Different Players</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/06/gamma-issues-change-look-dslr-footage-different-players/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/DSLR-Video-Player-Comparison-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/DSLR-Video-Player-Comparison.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[DSLR Video Player Comparison]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/DSLR-Video-Player-Comparison-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does 5DtoRGB Yield the Absolute Best Quality DSLR Footage?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5dtorgb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premierepro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=6452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Months ago here on NoFilmSchool I tried to call attention to a little-known DSLR plugin in development known as 5DtoRGB. 5DtoRGB is a software plugin from Rarevision similar to Canon E1, MPEG Streamclip, and Magic Bullet Grinder in that it is designed to transcode your DSLR footage into something that&#8217;s eminently more editable. 5DtoRGB claims [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/">Does 5DtoRGB Yield the Absolute Best Quality DSLR Footage?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/5DvsPremierePro-224x126.jpg" alt="" title="5DvsPremierePro" width="224" height="126" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6471" /><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/is-5dtorgb-the-dslr-post-production-solution-weve-been-waiting-for/">Months ago</a> here on NoFilmSchool I tried to call attention to a little-known DSLR plugin in development known as <a href="http://rarevision.com/5dtorgb/">5DtoRGB</a>. 5DtoRGB is a software plugin from <a href="http://rarevision.com">Rarevision</a> similar to <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/03/canon-dslr-movie-makers-you-need-this-now/">Canon E1</a>, <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr/transferring-viewing-transcoding/">MPEG Streamclip</a>, and <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/05/magic-bullet-grinder-is-a-day-late-and-a-dollar-too-much/">Magic Bullet Grinder</a> in that it is designed to transcode your DSLR footage into something that&#8217;s eminently more editable. 5DtoRGB claims to offer the highest quality output of all of these options, but despite my posting about the plugin <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/08/unlocked-beta-of-5dtorgb-now-available/">repeatedly</a>, I could do no actual tests with it since my lowly laptop was restricted to 32-bit processing (5DtoRGB requires a 64-bit processor). Now that I&#8217;ve successfully built a <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/08/coming-soon-the-nofilmschool-hac-pro/">64-bit hackintosh</a>, however (the how-to article is coming soon!), I was looking forward to putting the plugin to work. But I was beat to the punch by <a href="http://www.elskid.com/blog/?p=1624">NoFilmSchool regular</a> <a href="http://www.elskid.com/">Robin Schmidt</a>, who has done some great tests of his own, and as a result the word is out; now even <em>24</em> DP Rodney Charters is <a href="http://twitter.com/rodneykiwi/status/22466261433">tweeting about 5DtoRGB</a>. So now that we have our hands on the plugin, what&#8217;s the verdict? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/#more-6452" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/">Does 5DtoRGB Yield the Absolute Best Quality DSLR Footage?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=14678983" duration="21">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=14678983" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Does 5DtoRGB Yield the Absolute Best Quality DSLR Footage? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Months ago here on NoFilmSchool I tried to call attention to a little-known DSLR plugin in development known as 5DtoRGB. 5DtoRGB is a software plugin from Rarevision similar to Canon E1, MPEG Streamclip, and Magic Bullet Grinder in that it is designed to transcode your DSLR footage into something th]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/does-5dtorgb-yield-the-absolute-best-quality-dslr-footage-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>5dtorgb,dslr,fcp,gamma,premierepro,quicktime,news</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/5DvsPremierePro-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/5DvsPremierePro.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[5DvsPremierePro]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/5DvsPremierePro-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Color correcting DSLR footage on a Mac is a clustercuss</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorcorrection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h264]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In Zacuto&#8217;s most recent DSLR/film comparison, one of the commenters noted that upconverting to ProRes gave much better results (than editing native h.264 footage) in post. While ProRes is definitely a better codec (in terms of color space and compression), the clip showed as a reference seemed to exhibit a perpetually-annoying gamma shift bug that [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/">Color correcting DSLR footage on a Mac is a clustercuss</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4169" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/test-clip-prores-fcp-224x154.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="154" />In Zacuto&#8217;s <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/05/the-third-and-final-episode-of-zacutos-filmdslr-comparison-is-live/">most recent DSLR/film comparison</a>, one of the commenters noted that upconverting to ProRes gave much better results (than editing native h.264 footage) in post. While ProRes is definitely a better codec (in terms of color space and compression), the clip showed as a reference seemed to exhibit a perpetually-annoying gamma shift bug that applies to a lot of DSLR shooters &#8212; more specifically, anyone editing h.264 video on a Mac. When I shot <a href="http://www.filminfocus.com/africafirst/index.php">some stuff on my 5D</a> for Focus Features, I noticed that the clips looked desaturated and flat in Quicktime 7, and supersaturated and contrasty in Quicktime X (Quicktime X ships with Snow Leopard, and Quicktime 7 is an optional install). Jerome Stern at <a href="http://motionlifemediablog.wordpress.com/">MotionLife</a> corroborates this experience, decrying the lack of consistency when it comes to viewing and editing h.264 footage on a Mac: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/#more-4168" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/">Color correcting DSLR footage on a Mac is a clustercuss</a> appeared first on <a href="http://nofilmschool.com">nofilmschool</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/color-correcting-dslr-footage-on-a-mac-is-a-clustercuss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/test-clip-prores-fcp-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/test-clip-prores-fcp.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[test-clip-prores-fcp]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/test-clip-prores-fcp-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
