<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NoFilmSchool &#187; lowlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/lowlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>NoFilmSchool is a site for DIY filmmakers and independent creatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>The Moon as Your Key Light? The Canon C300 Delivers</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/moon-key-light-canon-c300-delivers/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/moon-key-light-canon-c300-delivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonc300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denoiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moonlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neatvideo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=19035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hyperbole? Not really. It&#8217;s no secret that the Canon C300 is a low-light monster. It&#8217;s also marginally better than the F3 and FS100 in high-ISO situations (debatable, but from what I&#8217;ve seen, it holds slightly more detail and color information in those extreme situations). But this is just ridiculous. Barry Goyette has posted a video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-19038" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/C300_Moonlight-224x138.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="138" />Hyperbole? Not really. It&#8217;s <a title="Canon C300 Does Great in Low Light but White Wall 'Breaks' the 8-Bit Codec" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/01/white-wall-breaks-canon-c300s-8-bit-codec/">no secret</a> that the Canon C300 is a <a title="How Do the Canon C300 and Sony F3 Compare in Low Light?" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-compare-light/">low-light monster</a>. It&#8217;s also marginally better than the F3 and FS100 in high-ISO situations (debatable, but from what I&#8217;ve seen, it holds slightly more detail and color information in those extreme situations). But this is just ridiculous. <a href="http://vimeo.com/user969663">Barry Goyette</a> has posted a video of mostly available light C300 footage &#8211; and get this &#8211; parts were lit with just moonlight. Yes, <em>that</em> moon, as in the reflection of the sun off of the lunar surface. For the really interesting footage, wait until after the credits. Here&#8217;s the video: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/moon-key-light-canon-c300-delivers/#more-19035" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/moon-key-light-canon-c300-delivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do the Canon C300 and Sony F3 Compare in Low Light?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-compare-light/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-compare-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonc300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=17045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameras have been getting more and more sensitive, so it follows that low light tests are a nice showcase of the latest in camera technology. Here, Sebastian Wiegärtner pits the Canon C300 against the Sony F3 (with S-Log) and Canon 7D:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-224x107.jpg" alt="" title="canon c300 sony f3" width="224" height="107" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-16818" />Cameras have been getting more and more sensitive, so it follows that low light tests are a nice showcase of the latest in camera technology. Here, <a href="http://wiegaertnerfilms.com/">Sebastian Wiegärtner</a> pits the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/c300">Canon C300</a> against the Sony F3 (with S-Log) and Canon 7D: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-compare-light/#more-17045" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/canon-c300-sony-f3-compare-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The thing about light is...</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/10/the-thing-about-light-is/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/10/the-thing-about-light-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vincentlaforet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, Canon has announced a 24p/25p update to the Canon 5d Mark II; this is crucial and I will now be keeping the camera I purchased mere months ago. But I don&#8217;t have much interesting to say about that, other than, &#8220;thank the lord.&#8221; There&#8217;s some other news out of the Canon camp today, however, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Canon has <a href="http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1661/new-5dmii-1d-news-from-canon">announced</a> a 24p/25p update to the Canon 5d Mark II; this is crucial and I will now be  keeping the camera I purchased mere months ago. But I don&#8217;t have much interesting to say about that, other than, &#8220;thank the lord.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some other news out of the Canon camp today, however, and that&#8217;s what the  title of this post is about. <em>The thing about light is</em>&#8230; when it comes to guerilla filmmaking, there&#8217;s never enough of it. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2009/10/the-thing-about-light-is/#more-869" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/10/the-thing-about-light-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

