<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; panasonicaf100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/panasonicaf100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon CN-E Cinema Primes vs. Still Lenses on the C300, 5D Mark III, RED SCARLET, and AF100</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-cinema-prime-test-magnanimous-media/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-cinema-prime-test-magnanimous-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5dmarkiii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon5dmarkiii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canoncinemaprime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canoncne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnanimousmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redscarlet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=36299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up until recently, there wasn&#8217;t much competition for PL style lenses at the lower budget level. If you were lucky, some used Super Speeds or Standard Speeds would be a good catch. Now we&#8217;ve got brand new cinema lenses from Canon right in this range, the CN-E lenses, and even though they aren&#8217;t PL mount, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-37231" title="Magnanimous Media - CN-E Prime Lens Test" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Magnanimous-Media-CN-E-Prime-Lens-Test-224x125.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="125" />Up until recently, there wasn&#8217;t much competition for PL style lenses at the lower budget level. If you were lucky, some used Super Speeds or Standard Speeds would be a good catch. Now we&#8217;ve got brand new cinema lenses from Canon right in this range, the CN-E lenses, and even though they aren&#8217;t PL mount, they cross off the other checkboxes in regards to giving you a professional solution. The <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/magnanimousmedia/">team over at Magnanimous Media</a> got a hold of the CN-E <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/844732-REG/Canon_6569B001_CN_E_24mm_T1_5_L.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">24mm T/1.5</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/844733-REG/Canon_6570B001_CN_E_50mm_T1_5_L.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">50mm T/1.3</a>, and <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/844735-REG/Canon_6571B001_CN_E_85mm_T1_3_L.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">85mm T/1.3</a> primes from Canon, and compared them in a brief, unscientific test against the equivalent still lenses from Canon, the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/590449-USA/Canon_2750B002_EF_24mm_f_1_4L_II.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">24mm F/1.4</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/457680-USA/Canon_1257B002AA_Normal_EF_50mm_f_1_2L.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">50mm F/1.2</a>, and <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/423691-USA/Canon_1056B002AA_EF_85mm_f_1_2L_II.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829">85mm F/1.2</a>. Click through to watch their results. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-cinema-prime-test-magnanimous-media/#more-36299" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/canon-cinema-prime-test-magnanimous-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=54731203" duration="38">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=54731203" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Canon CN-E Cinema Primes vs. Still Lenses on the C300, 5D Mark III, RED SCARLET, and AF100 - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Up until recently, there wasn&#039;t much competition for PL style lenses at the lower budget level. If you were lucky, some used Super Speeds or Standard Speeds would be a good catch. Now we&#039;ve got brand new cinema lenses from Canon right in this range, the CN-E lenses, and even though they aren&#039;t PL mo]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/canon-cn-e-cinema-primes-vs-still-lenses-on-the-c300-5d-mark-iii-red-scarlet-and-af100-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>5dmarkiii,af100,canon,canon5dmarkiii,canoncinemaprime,canoncne,lenses,magnanimousmedia,panasonic,panasonicaf100,red,redscarlet,scarlet</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Magnanimous-Media-CN-E-Prime-Lens-Test-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Magnanimous-Media-CN-E-Prime-Lens-Test.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Magnanimous Media - CN-E Prime Lens Test]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Magnanimous-Media-CN-E-Prime-Lens-Test-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Announces the AF100A, but is the Upgrade Worth It?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/panasonic-announces-af100a/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/panasonic-announces-af100a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Minich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af100a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=32247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first saw the announcement this morning I thought I had misread it, as this is something I believe neither I, nor most M43 users expected, but it is indeed true: Panasonic will be releasing an update to their AF100 line, the AF100A (technically AF105A since its initial release will be in Japan only), [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft  wp-image-30346 style-off" title="Panasonic AG-AF100" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-224x213.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="170" />When I first saw the announcement this morning I thought I had misread it, as this is something I believe neither I, nor most M43 users expected, but it is indeed true: Panasonic will be releasing an update to their <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/panasonicaf100/">AF100</a> line, the AF100A (technically AF105A since its initial release will be in Japan only), on November 15th. With a new camera model, this does seem to indicate that they are <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/panasonic-af100-officially-discontinued/">committed to the AF100 series of cameras</a> for some time. Here&#8217;s what we can expect from the new addition to Panasonic&#8217;s line of M43 cameras: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/panasonic-announces-af100a/#more-32247" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/11/panasonic-announces-af100a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic AG-AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic AF100 is *Not* Officially Discontinued, is the GH3 or the 4K VariCam Replacing It?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/panasonic-af100-officially-discontinued/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/panasonic-af100-officially-discontinued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=30345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE: Seems like a mistake on B&#38;H's part about the listing, according to Jan Crittenden Livingston at Panasonic it has not been discontinued. So the rest of this post will just serve as a reminder of my mistake -- though some of the information is still relevant.] It&#8217;s been rumored for a while now, but it [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft  wp-image-30346 style-off" title="Panasonic AG-AF100" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-224x213.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="170" />[<strong>UPDATE:</strong> Seems like a mistake on B&amp;H's part about the listing, <a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?293773-AF-100-discontinued-say-it-ain-t-so!-(It-ain-t-so-)&amp;p=1986214229&amp;viewfull=1#post1986214229">according to Jan Crittenden Livingston at Panasonic it has not been discontinued</a>. So the rest of this post will just serve as a reminder of my mistake -- though some of the information is still relevant.] It&#8217;s been rumored for a while now, but it looks like Panasonic has finally discontinued the AF100. Sluggish sales and <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/gh2/">better video quality from a cheaper camera (GH2)</a>, meant many low-budget filmmakers saved a few bucks and totally disregarded the more expensive sibling altogether. It&#8217;s sad news for many who&#8217;ve bought into the Panasonic Micro 4/3 video camera system hoping for an upgrade someday, but this may be the end of the road for that product line. So what exactly does this mean for Panasonic? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/panasonic-af100-officially-discontinued/#more-30345" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/panasonic-af100-officially-discontinued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic AG-AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Panasonic-AG-AF100-e1349977287555-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shoot a Short with Your AF100 and Win Prizes from Panasonic</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/shoot-short-af100-win-prizes-panasonic/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/shoot-short-af100-win-prizes-panasonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=18234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Own a Panasonic AF100? Need a new monitor for your color suite? If you answered yes to both, Panasonic&#8217;s second annual &#8220;Shoot It. Share It&#8221; competition could be exactly what you&#8217;re looking for. Panasonic wants videos under 5 minutes, and the grand prize winner chosen by a panel of judges will take home a sweet [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-6710 style-off" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image-224x180.png" alt="" width="224" height="180" />Own a <a title="The Panasonic AF-100 Reviews Are In. Is It a True HDSLR-Killer?" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/panasonic-af-100-reviews/" target="_blank">Panasonic AF100</a>? Need a new monitor for your <a title="DaVinci Resolve Now Available on Windows Thanks to Free Public Beta" href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/12/davinci-release-free-public-beta-windows/" target="_blank">color suite</a>? If you answered yes to both, Panasonic&#8217;s second annual &#8220;Shoot It. Share It&#8221; competition could be exactly what you&#8217;re looking for. Panasonic wants videos under 5 minutes, and the grand prize winner chosen by a panel of judges will take home a sweet <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/828085-REG/Panasonic_TH42BT300U_TH_42BT300U_42_HD_Professional.html/BI/5955/KBID/6829" target="_blank">42&#8243; Professional Plasma Display</a>. In the interest of fairness, here&#8217;s an AF100 video that meets their criteria but hasn&#8217;t been uploaded to the website: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/shoot-short-af100-win-prizes-panasonic/#more-18234" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/02/shoot-short-af100-win-prizes-panasonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=22958276" duration="210">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=22958276" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Shoot a Short with Your AF100 and Win Prizes from Panasonic - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Own a Panasonic AF100? Need a new monitor for your color suite? If you answered yes to both, Panasonic&#039;s second annual &#34;Shoot It. Share It&#34; competition could be exactly what you&#039;re looking for. Panasonic wants videos under 5 minutes, and the grand prize winner chosen by a panel of judges will take h]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/shoot-a-short-with-your-af100-and-win-prizes-from-panasonic-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>competition,contest,panasonicaf100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image-125x69.png" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[AG-AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/image-125x69.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philip Bloom&#039;s Camera Shootout Features the Latest Large Sensor DSLRs and Camcorders</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/01/canon-c300-sony-f3-fs100-panasonic-gh2/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/01/canon-c300-sony-f3-fs100-panasonic-gh2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonc300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicgh2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philipbloom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyfs100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=17403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was waiting for part two to post this, so now that it&#8217;s live, here is Philip Bloom&#8217;s latest camera shootout pitting the Canon C300, Sony NEX5N, Panasonic AF100, Panasonic GH2, Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 7D, Sony FS100, Sony F3, and Nikon D7000 against each other in a variety of real-world situations:]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/shootout-670x525-224x141.jpg" alt="" title="shootout-670x525" width="224" height="141" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-17407" />I was waiting for part two to post this, so now that it&#8217;s live, here is <a href="http://philipbloom.net">Philip Bloom&#8217;s</a> latest camera shootout pitting the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/canonc300">Canon C300</a>, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Sony+NEX5N&#038;N=0&#038;InitialSearch=yes&#038;BI=5955&#038;KBID=6829">Sony NEX5N</a>, Panasonic AF100, Panasonic GH2, Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 7D, Sony FS100, Sony F3, and Nikon D7000 against each other in a variety of real-world situations: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/01/canon-c300-sony-f3-fs100-panasonic-gh2/#more-17403" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/01/canon-c300-sony-f3-fs100-panasonic-gh2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=34637684" duration="1901">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=34637684" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Philip Bloom&#039;s Camera Shootout Features the Latest Large Sensor DSLRs and Camcorders - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[I was waiting for part two to post this, so now that it&#039;s live, here is Philip Bloom&#039;s latest camera shootout pitting the Canon C300, Sony NEX5N, Panasonic AF100, Panasonic GH2, Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 7D, Sony FS100, Sony F3, and Nikon D7000 against each other in a variety of real-world situations:]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/philip-blooms-camera-shootout-features-the-latest-large-sensor-dslrs-and-camcorders-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,canonc300,dslr,panasonicaf100,panasonicgh2,philipbloom,shootout,sonyf3,sonyfs100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/shootout-670x525-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/shootout-670x525.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[shootout-670x525]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/shootout-670x525-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Large-Chip Camcorders Compared by Philip Bloom: The Panasonic AF100, Sony F3, and Sony FS100</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/large-chip-camcorders-compared-philip-bloom/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/large-chip-camcorders-compared-philip-bloom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philipbloom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shootout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyfs100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=12065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Bloom, Kessler University, and Documovie.co.uk have conducted a shootout between the Panasonic AF100, Sony F3, and Sony FS100 (with a Canon 5D Mark II thrown in for good measure). As Philip states on his site, this is not meant to be a scientific test, as is the Single-Chip Camera Evaluation being released later this [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280-224x163.jpg" alt="" title="tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280" width="224" height="163" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-12073" /><a href="http://philipbloom.net">Philip Bloom</a>, <a href="http://www.kessleru.com/">Kessler University</a>, and <a href="http://www.documovie.co.uk/">Documovie.co.uk</a> have conducted a shootout between the Panasonic AF100, Sony F3, and Sony FS100 (with a Canon 5D Mark II thrown in for good measure). As Philip states on his site, this is not meant to be a scientific test, as is the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/numbers-single-chip-camera-evaluation-conducted/">Single-Chip Camera Evaluation</a> being released later this year, but the tests are a good watch for anyone considering these camcorders: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/large-chip-camcorders-compared-philip-bloom/#more-12065" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/large-chip-camcorders-compared-philip-bloom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23344796" duration="1845">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23344796" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Three Large-Chip Camcorders Compared by Philip Bloom: The Panasonic AF100, Sony F3, and Sony FS100 - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Philip Bloom, Kessler University, and Documovie.co.uk have conducted a shootout between the Panasonic AF100, Sony F3, and Sony FS100 (with a Canon 5D Mark II thrown in for good measure). As Philip states on his site, this is not meant to be a scientific test, as is the Single-Chip Camera Evaluation ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/three-large-chip-camcorders-compared-by-philip-bloom-the-panasonic-af100-sony-f3-and-sony-fs100-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,panasonicaf100,philipbloom,shootout,sonyf3,sonyfs100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tumblr_lk9iy2uEt41qzh0n9o1_1280-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Panasonic AF100 and the Truth About &#039;Sensor Flare&#039;</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/panasonic-af100-truth-sensor-flare/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/panasonic-af100-truth-sensor-flare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redepic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=10888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A thread popped up recently on DVXuser that claimed the Panasonic AF100 had a serious design flaw. The sensor would exhibit unacceptable flare when a bright light was pointed into the lens, the post claimed. I can&#8217;t like to the thread, as it&#8217;s since been deleted &#8212; because Panasonic is trying to keep a problem [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/af100sensorflare.jpg" alt="" title="af100sensorflare" width="224" height="124" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10892" />A thread popped up recently on <a href="http://dvxuser.com">DVXuser</a> that claimed the Panasonic AF100 had a serious design flaw. The sensor would exhibit unacceptable flare when a bright light was pointed into the lens, the post claimed. I can&#8217;t like to the thread, as it&#8217;s since been deleted &#8212; because Panasonic is trying to keep a problem under wraps? Not at all. It was deleted because, in the words of moderator/author <a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/member.php?31-Barry_Green">Barry Green</a>, it was simply FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt). So what&#8217;s the deal with the sensor flare on the AF100 &#8212; and on other cameras as well? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/panasonic-af100-truth-sensor-flare/#more-10888" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/panasonic-af100-truth-sensor-flare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=20632051" duration="79">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=20632051" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF100 and the Truth About &#039;Sensor Flare&#039; - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[A thread popped up recently on DVXuser that claimed the Panasonic AF100 had a serious design flaw. The sensor would exhibit unacceptable flare when a bright light was pointed into the lens, the post claimed. I can&#039;t like to the thread, as it&#039;s since been deleted -- because Panasonic is trying to kee]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/the-panasonic-af100-and-the-truth-about-sensor-flare-nofilmschool-224x95.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,cinematography,flare,panasonicaf100,redepic,sonyf3</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/af100sensorflare-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/af100sensorflare.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[af100sensorflare]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/af100sensorflare-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sony F3 Put to the Test: 12+ Stops of Dynamic Range and a Bit of Aliasing</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-f3-put-test-12-stops-dynamic-range/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-f3-put-test-12-stops-dynamic-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrialexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamicrange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=10873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video gurus Art Adams and Adam Wilt have put the Sony F3 through a suite of proper resolution, aliasing, IR sensitivity, and tonal-scale tests, and compared it with the Panasonic AF100 (now in stock at B&#038;H), RED, and ARRI ALEXA cameras. We&#8217;ll have to wait for Zacuto to publish their forthcoming single-chip shootout to get [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ArtF3AF100P1000228-224x119.jpg" alt="" title="ArtF3AF100P1000228" width="224" height="119" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10874" />Video gurus Art Adams and Adam Wilt have put the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/sony-f3">Sony F3</a> through a suite of proper resolution, aliasing, IR sensitivity, and tonal-scale tests, and compared it with the Panasonic AF100 (<a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">now in stock at B&#038;H</a>), RED, and ARRI ALEXA cameras. We&#8217;ll have to wait for <a href="http://www.zacuto.com">Zacuto</a> to publish their forthcoming single-chip shootout to get a look at proper real-world comparisons (their <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/download-and-watch-zacutos-camera-shootout-in-high-quality/">DSLR vs film shootout</a> was nominated for an Emmy), but here are the result for the time being. The F3 gets 12 + stops of dynamic range &#8212; before <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-releases-details-nxcams-upgrades-f3/">upgrading to S-Log</a>, which Sony is claiming offers significantly more dynamic range &#8212; which, in this price range, is unprecedented. More from their results: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-f3-put-test-12-stops-dynamic-range/#more-10873" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-f3-put-test-12-stops-dynamic-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=20554371" duration="60">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=20554371" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[The Sony F3 Put to the Test: 12+ Stops of Dynamic Range and a Bit of Aliasing - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Video gurus Art Adams and Adam Wilt have put the Sony F3 through a suite of proper resolution, aliasing, IR sensitivity, and tonal-scale tests, and compared it with the Panasonic AF100 (now in stock at B&#38;H), RED, and ARRI ALEXA cameras. We&#039;ll have to wait for Zacuto to publish their forthcoming sing]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/the-sony-f3-put-to-the-test-12-stops-of-dynamic-range-and-a-bit-of-aliasing-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>arrialexa,cameras,dynamicrange,panasonic,panasonicaf100,resolution,sony,sonyf3</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ArtF3AF100P1000228-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ArtF3AF100P1000228.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[ArtF3AF100P1000228]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ArtF3AF100P1000228-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Use a Light Meter (Sekonic&#039;s Low-Cost L-308DC with the Panasonic AF100)</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/light-meter-sekonics-low-cost-l-308dc/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/light-meter-sekonics-low-cost-l-308dc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightmeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sekonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=10297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, just a quick note that the Panasonic AF100 is currently in stock at B&#038;H Photo. It&#8217;s been a hard camera to find, as the demand is exceeding the supply &#8212; so if you were planning on buying the camera, please use this link to support NFS (at no additional cost to you). [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/sekonic308dc"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sekonic-light-meter.jpg" alt="" title="sekonic light meter" width="125" height="216" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10566 style-off" /></a>First of all, just a quick note that the Panasonic AF100 is currently <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">in stock at B&#038;H Photo</a>. It&#8217;s been a hard camera to find, as the demand is exceeding the supply &#8212; so if you were planning on buying the camera, please use <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">this link</a> to support NFS (at no additional cost to you). With that out of the way, here&#8217;s a video from <a href="http://blog.abelcine.com/2011/02/07/using-sekonics-308dc-light-meter-with-af100/">Abel Cine</a> highlighting the new low-cost<a href="http://nofilmschool.com/sekonic308dc"> Sekonic L-308DC</a> light meter, which like all light meters allows one to light by ratios &#8212; measuring stops without needing to constantly consult a camera&#8217;s waveform or histogram. However, the newly-released 308DC is a third of the price of most light meters, and is specifically designed for DSLR and digital cinematography: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/light-meter-sekonics-low-cost-l-308dc/#more-10297" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/light-meter-sekonics-low-cost-l-308dc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=19716627" duration="635">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=19716627" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[How to Use a Light Meter (Sekonic&#039;s Low-Cost L-308DC with the Panasonic AF100) - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[First of all, just a quick note that the Panasonic AF100 is currently in stock at B&#38;H Photo. It&#039;s been a hard camera to find, as the demand is exceeding the supply -- so if you were planning on buying the camera, please use this link to support NFS (at no additional cost to you). With that out of th]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/how-to-use-a-light-meter-sekonics-low-cost-l-308dc-with-the-panasonic-af100-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cinematography,lightmeter,panasonicaf100,sekonic</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sekonic-light-meter-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sekonic-light-meter.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[sekonic light meter]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sekonic-light-meter-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the $1,000 Panasonic GH2 a Better Camera Than the $5,000 Panasonic AF100?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/1000-panasonic-gh2-camera-5000-panasonic/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/1000-panasonic-gh2-camera-5000-panasonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicgh2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=10172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;d think if one of the largest electronics companies in the world was to release two cameras at the same time &#8212; one a pro video camera with a $5k price tag, and the other a consumer still/video hybrid cam that retails for 1/5 of the price &#8212; that they&#8217;d make sure the more expensive [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/panasonic_af100_gh2-224x95.jpg" alt="" title="panasonic_af100_gh2" width="224" height="95" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10174 style-off" />You&#8217;d think if one of the largest electronics companies in the world was to release two cameras at the same time &#8212; one a pro video camera with a $5k price tag, and the other a consumer still/video hybrid cam that retails for 1/5 of the price &#8212; that they&#8217;d make sure the more expensive model is better in every way. You&#8217;d think. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/1000-panasonic-gh2-camera-5000-panasonic/#more-10172" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/1000-panasonic-gh2-camera-5000-panasonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/panasonic_af100_gh2-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/panasonic_af100_gh2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[panasonic_af100_gh2]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/panasonic_af100_gh2-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Panasonic AF-100 Reviews Are In. Is It a True HDSLR-Killer?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/panasonic-af-100-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/panasonic-af-100-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=10076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF-100 (AF-101 in PAL countries) has been out long enough for the speculation about the camera to be replaced by actual videos (and reviews). We&#8217;ve taken a look at some footage from the camera, so now it&#8217;s time for a review roundup. To me, here&#8217;s the issue with the AF-100: if the camera [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-224x161.jpg" alt="" title="Panasonic_AF100" width="224" height="161" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7503 style-off" />The <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">Panasonic AF-100</a> (AF-101 in PAL countries) has been out long enough for the speculation about the camera to be replaced by actual videos (and reviews). We&#8217;ve taken a look at <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/">some</a> <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-3200-iso-proves/">footage</a> from the camera, so now it&#8217;s time for a review roundup. To me, here&#8217;s the issue with the AF-100: if the camera is to be considered a &#8220;true&#8221; HDSLR killer, it needs to bring to the table a full complement of real video camera features &#8212; and lack any glaring shortcomings &#8212; in order to justify its $5k sticker price. Is the AF-100 worth it? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/panasonic-af-100-reviews/#more-10076" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/02/panasonic-af-100-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mWmgrRdfX6Y" duration="506">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mWmgrRdfX6Y" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF-100 Reviews Are In. Is It a True HDSLR-Killer? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF-100 (AF-101 in PAL countries) has been out long enough for the speculation about the camera to be replaced by actual videos (and reviews). We&#039;ve taken a look at some footage from the camera, so now it&#039;s time for a review roundup. To me, here&#039;s the issue with the AF-100: if the camer]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/the-panasonic-af-100-reviews-are-in-is-it-a-true-hdslr-killer-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,dslr,hdslr,panasonicaf100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic_AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choosing the Right Lenses for the Next Generation of Cameras (Panasonic GH2, AF100, Sony F3)</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/choosing-lenses-generation-cameras-panasonic/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/choosing-lenses-generation-cameras-panasonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicgh2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonyf3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=9878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DSLR Cinematography Guide has several pages addressing lens use and choice. But the new cameras hitting the market &#8212; some with relatively new sensor sizes, like the Micro 4/3 Panasonic GH2 and AF100 &#8212; bring with them a new set of considerations. On their respective sites, Philip Bloom and Matthew Duclos have addressed the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/www.fdtimes-224x111.jpg" alt="" title="Sony F3 Primes" width="224" height="111" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9884 style-off" /><a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr">The DSLR Cinematography Guide</a> has <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr/lenses-primes-brands/">several pages</a> addressing lens use and choice. But the new cameras hitting the market &#8212; some with relatively new sensor sizes, like the Micro 4/3 Panasonic GH2 and AF100 &#8212; bring with them a new set of considerations. On their respective sites, Philip Bloom and Matthew Duclos have addressed the lens options for these cameras. First, here&#8217;s Duclos on the high-end F3: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/choosing-lenses-generation-cameras-panasonic/#more-9878" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/choosing-lenses-generation-cameras-panasonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/YjjH2gCdKwU" duration="109">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/YjjH2gCdKwU" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Choosing the Right Lenses for the Next Generation of Cameras (Panasonic GH2, AF100, Sony F3) - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[The DSLR Cinematography Guide has several pages addressing lens use and choice. But the new cameras hitting the market -- some with relatively new sensor sizes, like the Micro 4/3 Panasonic GH2 and AF100 -- bring with them a new set of considerations. On their respective sites, Philip Bloom and Matt]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/choosing-the-right-lenses-for-the-next-generation-of-cameras-panasonic-gh2-af100-sony-f3-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,lenses,panasonicaf100,panasonicgh2,sonyf3</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/www.fdtimes-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/www.fdtimes.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Sony F3 Primes]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/www.fdtimes-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Releases AF100 Firmware Update, GH1 Hacker Deems it &#039;Definitely&#039; Hackable</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/panasonic-releases-af100-firmware-update/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/panasonic-releases-af100-firmware-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gh1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=9795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panasonic has released their first firmware update for the AF100, and while it&#8217;s a minor one (fixing some SD card errors), the availability of such a file means that it can be dissected&#8230; and possibly hacked. Back in September when previewing the AF100 I asked, &#8220;who’s to say that an enterprising hacker won’t find a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-224x161.jpg" alt="" title="Panasonic_AF100" width="224" height="161" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7503 style-off" />Panasonic has released their first <a href="https://eww.pavc.panasonic.co.jp/pro-av/support/cs/csregistp2m/ep2main/soft/upgaf100_e.htm">firmware update</a> for the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">AF100</a>, and while it&#8217;s a minor one (fixing some <a href="https://eww.pavc.panasonic.co.jp/pro-av/support/cs/csregistp2m/ep2main/soft/af100/af100.htm">SD card errors</a>), the availability of such a file means that it can be dissected&#8230; and possibly hacked. Back in September when previewing the AF100 <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/panasonic-premieres-ag-af100-with-interchangeable-lenses-and-uncompressed-output/">I asked</a>, &#8220;who’s to say that an enterprising hacker won’t find a way to raise the bitrate of the AF100 in-camera, without requiring an external recorder?&#8221; Now the programmer behind the original <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/09/hacker-doubles-panasonic-gh1-bitrate-to-86mbitsec/">GH1 hack</a> is looking to do just that, deeming the AF100 firmware &#8220;definitely&#8221; hackable. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/panasonic-releases-af100-firmware-update/#more-9795" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/panasonic-releases-af100-firmware-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic_AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarifying Field of View, Depth of Field, and Crop Factors</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/clarifying-field-view-depth-field-crop/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/clarifying-field-view-depth-field-crop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony-f3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=9674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stu Maschwitz has a very interesting post about creating a &#8220;Shot You Can Make Simulator&#8221; that is essentially a virtual playground in After Effects for simulating different field of view/depth of field/crop factors. More on that in a second &#8212; first, on the same topic, Philip Bloom has a video comparing the field of view [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9679" title="prolost" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ShowImage-imageUrl-storage-post-images-theShotYouCanMake_007_cams_00001-224x125.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="125" /><a href="http://prolost.com/blog/2011/1/9/the-shot-you-can-make.html">Stu Maschwitz</a> has a very interesting post about creating a &#8220;Shot You Can Make Simulator&#8221; that is essentially a virtual playground in After Effects for simulating different field of view/depth of field/crop factors. More on that in a second &#8212; first, on the same topic, <a href="http://philipbloom.net/2010/12/29/fov2/">Philip Bloom</a> has a video comparing the field of view on the new Panasonic AF100 and Sony F3. As you can see below, the same lens yields a different FOV thanks to the Micro 4/3 crop factor of the AF100 (18.8 x10.6mm), compared to the Super 35 chip in the Sony (23.6 x 13.3mm): <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/clarifying-field-view-depth-field-crop/#more-9674" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/01/clarifying-field-view-depth-field-crop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=18257718" duration="77">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=18257718" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Clarifying Field of View, Depth of Field, and Crop Factors - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Stu Maschwitz has a very interesting post about creating a &#34;Shot You Can Make Simulator&#34; that is essentially a virtual playground in After Effects for simulating different field of view/depth of field/crop factors. More on that in a second -- first, on the same topic, Philip Bloom has a video compar]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/clarifying-field-of-view-depth-of-field-and-crop-factors-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cinematography,panasonicaf100,sony-f3</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ShowImage-imageUrl-storage-post-images-theShotYouCanMake_007_cams_00001-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ShowImage-imageUrl-storage-post-images-theShotYouCanMake_007_cams_00001.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[prolost]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ShowImage-imageUrl-storage-post-images-theShotYouCanMake_007_cams_00001-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera Test: Panasonic AF100 and Canon 5D Footage Side-by-Side</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-canon-5d-footage-side-by-side/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-canon-5d-footage-side-by-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=8066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a brief clip comparing Panasonic&#8217;s AF100 (due in December) to the venerable Canon 5D Mark II. The AF100 sports an image that seems flatter and much more rock-solid than the 5D&#8217;s, which is more hit-or-miss. But of course the 5D has that (nearly) VistaVision-sized sensor, which has its benefits. There&#8217;s no grading on either [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/af100-224x119.png" alt="" title="af100" width="224" height="119" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8067" />Here&#8217;s a brief clip comparing Panasonic&#8217;s <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">AF100</a> (due in December) to the venerable Canon 5D Mark II. The AF100 sports an image that seems flatter and much more rock-solid than the 5D&#8217;s, which is more hit-or-miss. But of course the 5D has that (nearly) VistaVision-sized sensor, which has its benefits. There&#8217;s no grading on either camera&#8217;s footage, take a look: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-canon-5d-footage-side-by-side/#more-8066" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-canon-5d-footage-side-by-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=16007277" duration="99">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=16007277" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Camera Test: Panasonic AF100 and Canon 5D Footage Side-by-Side - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a brief clip comparing Panasonic&#039;s AF100 (due in December) to the venerable Canon 5D Mark II. The AF100 sports an image that seems flatter and much more rock-solid than the 5D&#039;s, which is more hit-or-miss. But of course the 5D has that (nearly) VistaVision-sized sensor, which has its benefits]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/camera-test-panasonic-af100-and-canon-5d-footage-side-by-side-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>canon5d,cinematography,dslr,hdslr,panasonicaf100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/af100-125x69.png" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/af100.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[af100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/af100-125x69.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic AF100 Fares Far Better than its DSLR Cousins in Low Light</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-3200-iso-proves/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-3200-iso-proves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=7588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Bloom got his hands on a pre-production Panasonic AF100 and tested it with a super-fast Leica M 50mm f/1.1 prime lens &#8212; and no light sources other than a lit match. Here&#8217;s the resulting footage &#8212; shot without the aid of an external recorder, going to the AF100&#8242;s native 24mbps AVCHD codec:]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/IMG_0025-2.jpeg" alt="" title="IMG_0025 2" width="125" height="96" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7591" /><a href="http://philipbloom.net/2010/10/19/af100/">Philip Bloom</a> got his hands on a pre-production Panasonic AF100 and tested it with a super-fast Leica M 50mm f/1.1 prime lens &#8212; and no light sources other than a lit match. Here&#8217;s the resulting footage &#8212; shot without the aid of an external recorder, going to the AF100&#8242;s native 24mbps AVCHD codec: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-3200-iso-proves/#more-7588" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-3200-iso-proves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=16000333" duration="142">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=16000333" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic AF100 Fares Far Better than its DSLR Cousins in Low Light - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Philip Bloom got his hands on a pre-production Panasonic AF100 and tested it with a super-fast Leica M 50mm f/1.1 prime lens -- and no light sources other than a lit match. Here&#039;s the resulting footage -- shot without the aid of an external recorder, going to the AF100&#039;s native 24mbps AVCHD codec: h]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/panasonic-af100-fares-far-better-than-its-dslr-cousins-in-low-light-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,cinematography,dslr,panasonicaf100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/IMG_0025-2-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/IMG_0025-2.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[IMG_0025 2]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/IMG_0025-2-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Unsuccessfully Clarifies Micro 4/3 Sensor Size</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-unsuccessfully-clarifies-micro/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-unsuccessfully-clarifies-micro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensorsize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=7499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the announcement of the Panasonic AF100, I&#8217;ve been surprised by the number of commenters who seem to think the AF100&#8242;s Micro 4/3 chip is &#8220;too small.&#8221; In two short years, we&#8217;ve apparently gotten so accustomed to a full-frame DSLR that we&#8217;ve now unimpressed by a chip that&#8217;s several times larger than anything in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-224x161.jpg" alt="" title="Panasonic_AF100" width="224" height="161" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7503 style-off" />Ever since the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/">announcement of the Panasonic AF100</a>, I&#8217;ve been surprised by the number of commenters who seem to think the AF100&#8242;s Micro 4/3 chip is &#8220;too small.&#8221; In two short years, we&#8217;ve apparently gotten so accustomed to a full-frame DSLR that we&#8217;ve now unimpressed by a chip that&#8217;s several times larger than anything in its price range (in an actual &#8220;pro&#8221; video camera body). In an attempt to clarify how large the Micro 4/3 sensor is (in which case perhaps they shouldn&#8217;t have named it &#8220;Micro?&#8221;), Panasonic New Zealand has released a video comparing the 4/3 sensor with 35mm motion picture film. There&#8217;s just one problem with the video: it&#8217;s wrong. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-unsuccessfully-clarifies-micro/#more-7499" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-unsuccessfully-clarifies-micro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/K0shWr-oon4" duration="176">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/K0shWr-oon4" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic Unsuccessfully Clarifies Micro 4/3 Sensor Size - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Ever since the announcement of the Panasonic AF100, I&#039;ve been surprised by the number of commenters who seem to think the AF100&#039;s Micro 4/3 chip is &#34;too small.&#34; In two short years, we&#039;ve apparently gotten so accustomed to a full-frame DSLR that we&#039;ve now unimpressed by a chip that&#039;s several times la]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/panasonic-unsuccessfully-clarifies-micro-43-sensor-size-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>dslr,micro43,panasonicaf100,sensorsize</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Panasonic_AF100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Panasonic_AF100_Vanity-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Panasonic AF100 Footage Hits the &#039;Net. Are HDSLRs Over?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=7298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF100 (otherwise known as the AF101 in PAL countries) is an enticing video camera that&#8217;s looking to make DSLR shooters forget about the whole hybrid revolution. It&#8217;s made up of a Micro 4/3 sensor in a pro video camera body, complete with XLR audio inputs, numerous lens mount options, and uncompressed HD-SDI output. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7299" title="af100" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nfs.jpeg" alt="" width="224" height="149" />The <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/panasonicaf100">Panasonic AF100</a> (otherwise known as the AF101 in PAL countries) is an enticing video camera that&#8217;s looking to make DSLR shooters forget about the whole hybrid revolution. It&#8217;s made up of a Micro 4/3 sensor in a pro video camera body, complete with XLR audio inputs, numerous lens mount options, and uncompressed HD-SDI output. The first footage from the camera is now available, and it&#8217;s a pro clip: shot with a PL adapter and Zeiss Ultra Prime lenses, output through the HD-SDI output at 100 mbs, and recorded in the AVC Intra HD codec to P2 cards. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/#more-7298" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/panasonic-af100-footage-hits-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=15765280" duration="135">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=15765280" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[First Panasonic AF100 Footage Hits the &#039;Net. Are HDSLRs Over? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[The Panasonic AF100 (otherwise known as the AF101 in PAL countries) is an enticing video camera that&#039;s looking to make DSLR shooters forget about the whole hybrid revolution. It&#039;s made up of a Micro 4/3 sensor in a pro video camera body, complete with XLR audio inputs, numerous lens mount options, a]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/first-panasonic-af100-footage-hits-the-net-are-hdslrs-over-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>cameras,cinematography,dslr,panasonicaf100</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nfs-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nfs.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[af100]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nfs-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RED Abandons the Prosumer Market Because of DSLRs</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/red-abandons-prosumers-because-of-dslrs/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/red-abandons-prosumers-because-of-dslrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonicaf100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=7094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2006, RED announced the RED ONE, their first camera. In 2008, RED announced that the successors to that first camera would fall into two categories: EPIC and SCARLET. EPIC, as the name would suggest, was the big-boy camera for large Hollywood productions, and it was going to carry a matching price tag. SCARLET was [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7095 style-off" title="red_scarlet" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/red_scarlet-224x217.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="217" />In 2006, RED <a href="http://www.dvguru.com/2006/04/24/red-one-camera-announced-at-nab/">announced the RED ONE</a>, their first camera. In 2008, RED announced that the successors to that first camera would fall into two categories: EPIC and SCARLET. EPIC, as the name would suggest, was the big-boy camera for large Hollywood productions, and it was going to carry a matching price tag. SCARLET was for indies and prosumers. They originally targeted the $2,500 price point with the cheapest version of SCARLET, a 2/3&#8243; chip camera with a fixed lens. But then the HDSLR revolution happened. Canon added 24p to their 5d Mark II and, despite the lack of pro audio options and infamous problems like aliasing and compression issues, the idea of SCARLET lost a lot of its sheen. As a result, RED is not abandoning SCARLET wholly, but they are moving it up-market and repositioning it as a &#8220;pro&#8221; tool &#8212; effectively abandoning the prosumer and DSLR market. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/red-abandons-prosumers-because-of-dslrs/#more-7094" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/10/red-abandons-prosumers-because-of-dslrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/red_scarlet-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/red_scarlet.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[red_scarlet]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/red_scarlet-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
