<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NoFilmSchool &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>NoFilmSchool is a site for DIY filmmakers and independent creatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Silent World is a Breathtaking Photography Series That Imagines the World Almost Uninhabited by People</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/04/silent-world-photography-series-lucie-simon/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/04/silent-world-photography-series-lucie-simon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timelapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=21561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not exactly filmmaking related, it seems fitting for this site to take a look at the video of this series of photographs called Silent World. Created by photography team Lucie &#38; Simon, they imagine the world without the bustling humans that take up so much space in several sprawling cities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft  wp-image-21562 style-off" title="©Lucie&amp;Simon Silent World Photography Series" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/005_lucie_simon_silentworld-224x168.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="151" /></p>
<p>While not exactly filmmaking related, it seems fitting for this site to take a look at the video of this series of photographs called Silent World. Created by photography team <a href="http://www.lucieandsimon.com/works/silent_world">Lucie &amp; Simon</a>, they imagine the world without the bustling humans that take up so much space in several sprawling cities. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/04/silent-world-photography-series-lucie-simon/#more-21561" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/04/silent-world-photography-series-lucie-simon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Your Lens Choice Affects Your Subject&#039;s Appearance</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/lens-choice-affects-subjects-appearance/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/lens-choice-affects-subjects-appearance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portraits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=16031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A longer lens can flatten and widen a face, whereas a wider lens can pinch/pull facial features into an ugly distortion. This is true because of the varying physical distance to your subject that accompanies your choice of lens. This is not just a consideration for portrait photography, but also comes into play when choosing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/xlarge_e4315eb25d608da3dcf848172e4f2928-616x346.jpg" alt="" title="xlarge_e4315eb25d608da3dcf848172e4f2928" width="616" height="346" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-16033" /></p>
<p>A longer lens can flatten and widen a face, whereas a wider lens can pinch/pull facial features into an ugly distortion. This is true because of the varying physical <em>distance</em> to your subject that accompanies your choice of lens. This is not just a consideration for portrait photography, but also comes into play when choosing a lens for filming actors. For the the full size images of the thumbnails above, see photographer <a href="http://stepheneastwood.com/tutorials/lensdistortion/strippage.htm">Stephen Eastwood&#8217;s site</a>, or watch a video of how different distances (and accompanying lens choices) affect facial geometry by <a href="http://www.lensprotogo.com/">LensProToGo</a>: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/lens-choice-affects-subjects-appearance/#more-16031" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/11/lens-choice-affects-subjects-appearance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Case You Missed the Crazy Future Camera That&#039;s Refocusable in Post, Here It Is</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/07/case-missed-camera-thats-refocusable-post/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/07/case-missed-camera-thats-refocusable-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lytro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plenoptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=12868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago a reader emailed me about plenoptic cameras, also known as light-field cameras, which allow an image to be refocused after the picture is taken. Sometimes referred to as a 4D camera, this crazy technology is now headed to a consumer camera from new manufacturer Lytro. News of this development, which utilizes technology first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/lytro-224x107.jpg" alt="" title="lytro" width="224" height="107" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-13056 style-off" />Years ago a reader emailed me about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plenoptic_camera">plenoptic cameras</a>, also known as light-field cameras, which allow an image to be refocused <em>after</em> the picture is taken. Sometimes referred to as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4D_light_field#The_4D_light_field">4D camera</a>, this crazy technology is now headed to a consumer camera from new manufacturer <a href="http://www.lytro.com/">Lytro</a>. News of this development, which utilizes technology first seen in a <a href="http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/">2005 Stanford research paper</a>, hit the internet last week, with Lytro now taking reservations for the device. Check out the refocusable images in action, and let me know what you think &#8212; game-changer or gimmick? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/07/case-missed-camera-thats-refocusable-post/#more-12868" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/07/case-missed-camera-thats-refocusable-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Customize the Shape of Your Bokeh in Photos and Videos</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/customize-shape-bokeh-photos-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/customize-shape-bokeh-photos-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know you can change the shape of your bokeh by cutting out paper shapes and placing them over your lens? Maybe you did. I didn&#8217;t, though, and found out about this simple trick from DANIELS (the guys who brought us this music video), in their mini-video for &#8220;Who Do You Love&#8221; by Sue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/bokeh5-224x148.jpg" alt="" title="bokeh5" width="224" height="148" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11689" />Did you know you can change the shape of your bokeh by cutting out paper shapes and placing them over your lens? Maybe you did. I didn&#8217;t, though, and found out about this simple trick from <a href="http://www.danieldaniel.us/">DANIELS</a> (the guys who brought us <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/daniels-awesome-simple-math-music/">this music video</a>), in their mini-video for &#8220;Who Do You Love&#8221; by <a href="http://www.suescrofa.com/">Sue Scrofa</a>. Hearts, shapes, letters, entire words: you can make your background highlights appear in the shape of anything you can cut out with scissors. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/customize-shape-bokeh-photos-videos/#more-11653" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/customize-shape-bokeh-photos-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lensbaby Releases New Composer Pro Lens Specially Tailored for Video Use</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/lensbaby-releases-composer-pro-lenses-tailored/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/lensbaby-releases-composer-pro-lenses-tailored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensbaby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lensbabies are wonderful specialty lenses that create selective defocus effects on DSLRs (or SLRs, for that matter). But as soon as I pull the trigger and buy a Lensbaby Composer &#8212; which I love &#8212; Lensbaby comes out with the new Lensbaby Composer Pro. What does the new Pro offer over my oh-so amateur model? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/lensbaby-composer-pro-224x109.jpg" alt="" title="lensbaby-composer-pro" width="224" height="109" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11267 style-off" />Lensbabies are wonderful specialty lenses that create selective defocus effects on DSLRs (or SLRs, for that matter). But as soon as I pull the trigger and buy a Lensbaby Composer &#8212; which I love &#8212; Lensbaby comes out with the new Lensbaby Composer Pro.  What does the new Pro offer over my oh-so amateur model? Mainly, it&#8217;s much better for video, because the mechanics are much smoother. Now I feel like one of the people in that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZAAZ7iXN-o">Best Buy commercial</a>. Here&#8217;s a look at the new Composer Pro in action: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/lensbaby-releases-composer-pro-lenses-tailored/#more-11266" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/lensbaby-releases-composer-pro-lenses-tailored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$10,000 for your best photograph at Artists Wanted</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/artists-wanted-wants-to-give-you-10000-for-your-best-photograph/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/artists-wanted-wants-to-give-you-10000-for-your-best-photograph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artistswanted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=4097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artists Wanted wants, well, artists. They&#8217;re currently looking for &#8220;your best photographs&#8221; and are giving away $10,000 cash and a year of free living at a $1.2 million apartment at The Edge in New York City, along with a Manhattan gallery reception and airfare to and from New York City for the event. Obviously this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/artistw.jpg" alt="" title="artistw" width="224" height="112" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4153" /><a href="http://www.artistswanted.org/">Artists Wanted</a> wants, well, artists. They&#8217;re currently looking for &#8220;your best photographs&#8221; and are giving away $10,000 cash and a year of free living at a $1.2 million apartment at The Edge in New York City, along with a Manhattan gallery reception and airfare to and from New York City for the event. Obviously this is going to be a highly competitive project with prizes of that caliber. Deadline is June 7, so if you&#8217;ve got some great photos, check out their blurb: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/artists-wanted-wants-to-give-you-10000-for-your-best-photograph/#more-4097" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/06/artists-wanted-wants-to-give-you-10000-for-your-best-photograph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sitelight: Daily Dose of Imagery</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/02/sitelight-daily-dose-of-imagery/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/02/sitelight-daily-dose-of-imagery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sitelight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily Dose of Imagery is the online &#8212; and ongoing &#8212; portolio of candid shots taken by the Iranian-born, Canada-residing photographer Sam Javanrouh. In the same vein as nofilmschool &#8211; although a bit more obvious because of its name &#8212; Daily Dose of Imagery features a new post every day. If you&#8217;re primarily shooting video on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1785" title="streetcar-510-spadina_queens-quay-w_01" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/streetcar-510-spadina_queens-quay-w_01-284x174.jpg" alt="" width="284" height="174" /></a><a href="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/">Daily Dose of Imagery</a> is the online &#8212; and ongoing &#8212; portolio of candid shots taken by the Iranian-born, Canada-residing photographer Sam Javanrouh. In the same vein as <em>nofilmschool </em>&#8211; although a bit more obvious because of its name &#8212; Daily Dose of Imagery features a new post every day. If you&#8217;re primarily shooting video on your DSLR, Sam&#8217;s work is a great example of what you can do if you take the camera out of movie mode. The site is a steady stream of well-shot photos of everyday life, which are also included in the <a href="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/index_fullfeed.rdf">RSS feed</a>, so if you&#8217;re an RSS user head on over and subscribe (not to mention to the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/feed">nofilmschool RSS feed</a>)!</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/">Daily Dose of Imagery</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2010/02/sitelight-daily-dose-of-imagery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of cinematography; or, how I learned to stop worrying and love the DSLR</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/08/the-future-of-cinematography-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-dslr/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/08/the-future-of-cinematography-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-dslr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s get technical. The human eye is a far superior instrument to the film or video camera. Over the years film stocks have gotten more sensitive, larger negatives and three-strip processes have been developed,  and video cameras have improved immeasurably, but these innovations have not brought the baseline visual fidelity of cameras to the level [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1417" title="canon-5d-markii" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/canon-5d-markii.jpg" alt="" width="284" height="160" />Let&#8217;s get technical.</p>
<p>The human eye is a far superior instrument to the film or video camera. Over the years film stocks have gotten more sensitive, larger negatives and three-strip processes have been developed,  and video cameras have improved immeasurably, but these innovations have not brought the baseline visual fidelity of cameras to the level of  our own  <em>ojos</em>. It&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html">claimed</a> that the resolution of the human eye is equivalent to 576 megapixels;  while that claim should be taken with a grain of salt, as should any calculations of dynamic range, sensitivity, and field of view, all such assesments lead to one conclusion: our eyeballs are pretty damn good. For decades, the most common observation for first-time cinematographers has likely been, &#8220;wow, this camera needs a lot more light than my eyes.&#8221; <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2009/08/the-future-of-cinematography-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-dslr/#more-317" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2009/08/the-future-of-cinematography-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-dslr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

