<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; polaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imageprocessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodaks1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirrorless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=40696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-42211 style-off" title="could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-224x145.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="145" />In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, <strong>branding</strong> can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from bankruptcy &#8212; but it&#8217;s a start. Polaroid, Technicolor, and Kodak are prime examples of this interplay, and each is adapting in its own ways &#8212; though there&#8217;s some overlap. Not one, but <em>two</em> of these traditionally film-based companies are even releasing digital cameras. In whatever the way, each of the three is working toward the preservation of its own historic brand name &#8212; which do you think will pull through? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#more-40696" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" duration="490">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#039;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#039;the new&#039; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memor]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-with-the-branded-beast-extinct-what-becomes-of-the-brand-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>brand,branding,camera,celluloid,film,imageprocessing,kodak,kodaks1,m43,mft,micro43,mirrorless,polaroid,s1,software,technicolor,video</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Instagram: &#039;Impossible Project&#039; Turns Your iPhone Photos into Polaroids</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/real-instagram-impossible-project-turns-iphone-photos-into-polaroids/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/real-instagram-impossible-project-turns-iphone-photos-into-polaroids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Marine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impossibleproject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kickstarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=30272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instagram has always felt a little bit like cheating to me, and having come from a film background, I like seeing the real thing as opposed to a clearly inferior iPhone or Android photo with some old-timey effects (though I am extremely impressed by FilmConvert, which aims to do the exact same thing except a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-30273 style-off" title="Impossible Project iPhone Polaroid" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Impossible-Project-iPhone-Polaroid-224x168.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="168" />Instagram has always felt a little bit like cheating to me, and <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/celluloid/">having come from a film background</a>, I like seeing the real thing as opposed to a clearly inferior <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/iphone/">iPhone</a> or <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/android/">Android</a> photo with some old-timey effects (<a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/09/filmconvert-emulating-film-stocks-using-color-information-of-digital-sensors/">though I am extremely impressed by FilmConvert</a>, which aims to do the exact same thing except a lot more accurately with motion content). Impossible Project, who managed to save Polaroid film and is producing it to this day (along with new cameras), is trying to take those iPhone photos and turn them into something real and tangible: a Polaroid instant photo.<br />
 <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/real-instagram-impossible-project-turns-iphone-photos-into-polaroids/#more-30272" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2012/10/real-instagram-impossible-project-turns-iphone-photos-into-polaroids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mh1xv4-nQls" duration="276">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mh1xv4-nQls" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[The Real Instagram: &#039;Impossible Project&#039; Turns Your iPhone Photos into Polaroids - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[Instagram has always felt a little bit like cheating to me, and having come from a film background, I like seeing the real thing as opposed to a clearly inferior iPhone or Android photo with some old-timey effects (though I am extremely impressed by FilmConvert, which aims to do the exact same thing]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/the-real-instagram-impossible-project-turns-your-iphone-photos-into-polaroids-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>film,impossibleproject,kickstarter,polaroid</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Impossible-Project-iPhone-Polaroid-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Impossible-Project-iPhone-Polaroid.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Impossible Project iPhone Polaroid]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Impossible-Project-iPhone-Polaroid-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
