<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
	<title>nofilmschool &#187; technicolor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nofilmschool.com/tag/technicolor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nofilmschool.com</link>
	<description>read, discuss, learn: free film school for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kendricken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celluloid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imageprocessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodaks1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mirrorless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=40696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-42211 style-off" title="could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-224x145.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="145" />In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#8217;s Law, <strong>branding</strong> can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#8216;the new&#8217; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memories. Granted, nostalgia alone can&#8217;t save anyone from bankruptcy &#8212; but it&#8217;s a start. Polaroid, Technicolor, and Kodak are prime examples of this interplay, and each is adapting in its own ways &#8212; though there&#8217;s some overlap. Not one, but <em>two</em> of these traditionally film-based companies are even releasing digital cameras. In whatever the way, each of the three is working toward the preservation of its own historic brand name &#8212; which do you think will pull through? <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/#more-40696" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-first-mft-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" duration="490">
			<media:player url="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/D96M27FNWAM" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Polaroid, Technicolor, Kodak: With the Branded Beast Extinct, What Becomes of the Brand? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[In the whirlwind of hyperactive change that is Moore&#039;s Law, branding can be a prime anchor point. Brand identity fights the tendency toward &#039;the new&#039; with powerful invocations of the past: nostalgia, reliability, simplicity, and the association of that brand name with the creation of very dear memor]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/polaroid-technicolor-kodak-with-the-branded-beast-extinct-what-becomes-of-the-brand-nofilmschool-224x168.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>brand,branding,camera,celluloid,film,imageprocessing,kodak,kodaks1,m43,mft,micro43,mirrorless,polaroid,s1,software,technicolor,video</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[could this be a picture of polaroid kodak technicolor adapt or die diversify]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/could-this-be-a-picture-of-polaroid-kodak-technicolor-adapt-or-die-diversify-e1359615993332-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#039;s Settle This: Do Canon DSLRs Perform Best at ISO Multiples of 160?</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/lets-settle-this-shoot-isos-multiples/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/lets-settle-this-shoot-isos-multiples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 20:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m confused. In the DSLR Guide&#8217;s chapter on ISO noise, I originally stated that it was optimal to shoot at ISOs divisible by 160, because the camera&#8217;s noise levels were lowest. Then I was told that this came at the expense of highlight headroom, so I recanted a bit. Now, as part of the Technicolor [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281-224x100.jpg" alt="" title="5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281" width="224" height="100" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11920" />I&#8217;m confused. In the DSLR Guide&#8217;s <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr/iso-noise/">chapter on ISO noise</a>, I originally stated that it was optimal to shoot at ISOs divisible by 160, because the camera&#8217;s noise levels were lowest. Then I was told that this <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr/iso-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-64705">came at the expense of highlight headroom</a>, so I recanted a bit. Now, as part of the <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture/">Technicolor CineStyle picture setting release</a>, the user manual mentions that one should shoot at &#8220;multiples of 160.&#8221; I assume Technicolor knows what they&#8217;re talking about, but the question remains. <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/lets-settle-this-shoot-isos-multiples/#more-11915" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/lets-settle-this-shoot-isos-multiples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23082874" duration="109">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23082874" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Let&#039;s Settle This: Do Canon DSLRs Perform Best at ISO Multiples of 160? - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused. In the DSLR Guide&#039;s chapter on ISO noise, I originally stated that it was optimal to shoot at ISOs divisible by 160, because the camera&#039;s noise levels were lowest. Then I was told that this came at the expense of highlight headroom, so I recanted a bit. Now, as part of the Technicolor ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/lets-settle-this-do-canon-dslrs-perform-best-at-iso-multiples-of-160-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>canon,dslr,hdslr,iso,latitude,noise,technicolor,tests</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/5672069943_a38b74eac8_b-500x281-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon-Technicolor &#039;CineStyle&#039; DSLR Picture Profile Now Available as a Free Download</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictureprofile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The previously announced Canon-Technicolor joint picture profile, &#8220;CineStyle,&#8221; is now available for Canon DSLR shooters as a free download. We&#8217;d heard from Technicolor that the picture style would allow for greater control and latitude, but the question on everyone&#8217;s mind is, how much can a picture setting do without changing the limited 4:2:0 h.264 codec? [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/cinestyle-landing1-224x122.jpg" alt="" title="cinestyle-landing" width="224" height="122" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11896" />The <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/canon-partners-technicolor-bring-cinestyle/">previously announced</a> Canon-Technicolor joint picture profile, &#8220;CineStyle,&#8221; is now available for Canon DSLR shooters as a free download. We&#8217;d <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/nab-video-details-canon-technicolor-dslr/">heard from Technicolor</a> that the picture style would allow for greater control and latitude, but the question on everyone&#8217;s mind is, how much can a picture setting do without changing the limited 4:2:0 h.264 codec? I haven&#8217;t put it to the test myself, but <a href="http://crookedpathfilms.com/blog/2011/04/29/the-new-technicolor-cine-style-for-canon-dslrs-first-thoughts/">crooked path films</a> did: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture/#more-11892" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23067790" duration="96">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=23067790" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Canon-Technicolor &#039;CineStyle&#039; DSLR Picture Profile Now Available as a Free Download - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[The previously announced Canon-Technicolor joint picture profile, &#34;CineStyle,&#34; is now available for Canon DSLR shooters as a free download. We&#039;d heard from Technicolor that the picture style would allow for greater control and latitude, but the question on everyone&#039;s mind is, how much can a picture ]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/canon-technicolor-cinestyle-dslr-picture-profile-now-available-as-a-free-download-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>canon,dslr,hdslr,pictureprofile,technicolor</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/cinestyle-landing1-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/cinestyle-landing1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[cinestyle-landing]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/cinestyle-landing1-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAB Video: More Details on the Canon-Technicolor DSLR Partnership</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/nab-video-details-canon-technicolor-dslr/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/nab-video-details-canon-technicolor-dslr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictureprofile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Sony is charging $3,300 for its S-LOG upgrade to the F3, Canon and Technicolor are releasing a Log-based picture profile for Canon DSLRs for free. Because the downloadable picture style won&#8217;t be available until April 30, it remains to be seen how much more latitude the new setting will offer over user-generated flat picture [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-224x102.jpg" alt="" title="Logo_Technicolor_RVB" width="224" height="102" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11290 style-off" />While Sony is <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/03/sony-releases-details-nxcams-upgrades-f3/">charging $3,300 for its S-LOG upgrade</a> to the F3, Canon and Technicolor are releasing a Log-based picture profile for Canon DSLRs for free. Because the downloadable picture style won&#8217;t be available until April 30, it remains to be seen how much more latitude the new setting will offer over <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/dslr/picture-style-editor/">user-generated flat picture styles</a>. If the new Technicolor color science is substantially superior to what&#8217;s available today, Canon&#8217;s plans to release it free will, as Technicolor&#8217;s rep says, &#8220;make up for it in volume.&#8221; <a href="http://www.dslrnewsshooter.com/2011/04/14/nab-2011-technicolor-demonstrate-the-cinestyle-picture-style-for-canon-dslr-video/">Dan Chung </a>has more details: <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/nab-video-details-canon-technicolor-dslr/#more-11550" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/nab-video-details-canon-technicolor-dslr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=22388371" duration="387">
			<media:player url="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=22388371" />
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[NAB Video: More Details on the Canon-Technicolor DSLR Partnership - nofilmschool]]></media:title>
			<media:description type="html"><![CDATA[While Sony is charging $3,300 for its S-LOG upgrade to the F3, Canon and Technicolor are releasing a Log-based picture profile for Canon DSLRs for free. Because the downloadable picture style won&#039;t be available until April 30, it remains to be seen how much more latitude the new setting will offer o]]></media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nab-video-more-details-on-the-canon-technicolor-dslr-partnership-nofilmschool-224x125.jpg" />
			<media:keywords>canon,dslr,hdslr,pictureprofile,technicolor</media:keywords>
		</media:content>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Logo_Technicolor_RVB]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Partners with Technicolor to Bring &#039;CineStyle&#039; Setting to DSLRs for Greater Latitude</title>
		<link>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/canon-partners-technicolor-bring-cinestyle/</link>
		<comments>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/canon-partners-technicolor-bring-cinestyle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Koo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nab2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicolor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nofilmschool.com/?p=11289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon and cinema mainstay Technicolor have announced a &#8220;strategic alliance&#8221; designed to improve cinema-style shooting on HDSLRs. After reportedly working with professional cinematographers and colorists over the past year, the two companies will jointly unveil a new CineStyle picture profile on Canon DSLRs at NAB, along with a new suite of creative tools designed to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11290 style-off" title="Logo_Technicolor_RVB" src="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-224x102.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="102" />Canon and cinema mainstay <a href="http://www.technicolor.com/">Technicolor</a> have announced a &#8220;strategic alliance&#8221; designed to improve cinema-style shooting on HDSLRs. After reportedly working with professional cinematographers and colorists over the past year, the two companies will jointly unveil a new CineStyle picture profile on Canon DSLRs at NAB, along with a new suite of creative tools designed to &#8220;give post-production professionals image files with much greater latitude and versatility when color grading EOS footage.&#8221; <a href="http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/canon-partners-technicolor-bring-cinestyle/#more-11289" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nofilmschool.com/2011/04/canon-partners-technicolor-bring-cinestyle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-125x69.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html"><![CDATA[Logo_Technicolor_RVB]]></media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://nofilmschool.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Technicolor-white-125x69.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
