August 25, 2015 at 12:03PM, Edited August 25, 12:04PM

0

Ursa Mini vs Ursa

Is there any difference in image quality or is it all just about upgradable sensor, dual touch screens & dual recording ?

4 Comments

There is a huge difference in size and weight. The original Ursa camera is 11.5 lbs HEAVIER than the Ursa Mini. ( 5 lbs vs 16.5 lbs )

August 25, 2015 at 12:45PM

0
Reply
Guy McLoughlin
Video Producer
32889

Yeah I know it, but how does it translate to image quality ?

Andy Tokarski

August 25, 2015 at 3:45PM

>>>Yeah I know it, but how does it translate to image quality ?

We won't know until the Ursa Mini starts to ship, but it appears that you can get the same sensor on both cameras. ( the new 4.6K sensor or the older 4K sensor )

My guess is that you won't see much if any difference in the image each camera produces if you are using the same sensor.

August 25, 2015 at 6:03PM

0
Reply
Guy McLoughlin
Video Producer
32889

There is footage from the Mini yet so it's all extrapolation from specs from now.

The Blackmagic Ursa could be a better long-term investment since you can swap the sensor with future sensors from Blackmagic.

August 26, 2015 at 9:53PM

0
Reply
avatar
Heri Rakotomalala
DP/Camera, Studio owner, Associate Producer
404

Your Comment