What they didn't convey is that their pricing actually increased. So while they are generous enough to give you a 20% off code, it still costs more since (from what I've seen) the cost has at least doubled.
I actually prefer the form factor of the EOS Cinema cameras for run and gun. I think that is more of a preference than anything. So not really a big problem.
And while I do agree with the 60fps 4k being needed, I think the things you listed aren't really better or much better. The recording media is the same. Neither is really cheaper. Yes, you have more lens options, but most people buying Canon are fine with Canon glass and it doesn't require adapters (once again, more of a preference issue). 180fps is better in my opinion, but I also like the idea of 120 @ 2k. And in-camera audio on the body is again a preference issue. With Canon's line, I can go without the top handle when I don't need audio and it makes it even easier for running and gunning. And that shoulder mount straight out of the box for the FS7 is a bit odd for me. But, I will say, Canon is missing the bang for the buck that Sony has.
Maybe you should watch the video again. When hRyan uses a C-stand or Kino, he actually says other alternatives that are very much cheaper. He isn't pretending about anything. In fact, he even tells you the clamp is 4x the amount of the bead board.
This is to replace the wireless lav packs like the Sennheiser G3s. The Zoom H1 can't really do that.