Am I right in thinking that the article and all the videos are just one big paid advertisement for the GH5?

Should that not be mentioned in the title, or anywhere else? Its nice content but I think it should say somewhere that it is sponsored content. Just a small line about the agreement between Panasonic and the film maker and that it in no way contributed to the opinions expressed in the videos.

Not hating on the content btw, videos were very nice and it does seem like a good use of Panasonics marketing budget. :)

Alternative to tungsten lighting if you " 2.) are inexperienced working with lights. "

...... That is rubbish. How about LEDs are great for news and corporate environment. How about they are a great alternative to Kino Flow lights if you don't have the transportation space and crew size.

The end remarks there at the end of that post are not great. There are waaaaay more reasons to opt for an LED option over a traditional tungsten solution.

What happened to 4k for 4k?

Is the name Phil a cheeky reference to Mr.Bloom. If so then it is even more funny :P

Nice upgrade form C100 MK1?

It is so front heavy that you will need surgery after a day at the races. You cannot shoot 4k and the HD is a smaller windowed version so your ISO performance may suffer. The screen must be opened by your face if you would like to change any menu items...

Cmon guys stop paying good money for BETA products that miss key requirements. It is promoting bad practice.