I'm a little older than you. I was twenty-two when the first movie came out and I hadn't read the book.
A buddy and I were at the mall, probably looking to kill some time before something else later that night and decided to see a movie at the cheap theater. There wasn't really anything to see but The Sorcerer's Stone. So we saw that.
It looked a little interesting, but I remember walking in thinking it would be a dumb kids movie. I walked out pleasantly surprised.

It was more enjoyable than I expected.

At some point I saw the second film, I don't remember when, but it didn't do anything for me.
When I saw the third film I was impressed a lot. At that point the kids in the series were a little older and the film was a little darker and I could relate to it more.
I went and saw the forth film by myself at the theater a couple weeks after it came out and loved it. At that point I was hooked.

It's a series that my girlfriend and I now regularly watch about once a year. We both agree that the middle four films are the best.

While I agree with what the video says, I wouldn't call the failing of said test lazy. I doubt there are tons of screenwriters and directors out there saying "eh... I just really can't be bothered to write in a second female character and have her converse with the first about something other then a man."
I think the reality is less apathetic and less devious. It's more like a bunch of people (typically guys) who write and direct what they know, what they want to know or what they fear. It's neither lazy nor devious if they aren't aware of what they are doing or rather not doing. It's also not devious if they simply want to go in their own direction without having to check off certain checkboxes.
Artists should be allowed to have preferences.

The most important thing is that more females start writing and directing more films about what they know, want to know or what they fear. Filmmaking is not a zero sum game. There are over seven billion people in the world and plenty of films that can be made to reach a variety of audiences. There is no reason to believe that if you give to one you have to take from the other.

I'm curious what their criteria is for picking these cameras and why not include more? Just build on the same list every year by adding more. It's a Google doc, it's not like they are limited on page space.

Obviously they exclude cameras that are rental only (why?) so the DXL and Alexa 65 are out, but what about the Canon C100mkI / II, the RED Raven, the FS5, etc? I mean when you really think about it we're not talking about a list that is all that insanely long.

But... all of that said. It's a very handy tool that I appreciate even as is. So thank you.

"full 4K UHD capture"

The Amira does upscaled 4K, not true 4K. Otherwise it would be on the Netflix approved camera list. So yeah, you're better off shooting raw if you want the best quality.

Great review. Was your film 72 Hours: a Brooklyn Love Story? shot on this camera?

Yup.