I spent 9 years cutting on Vegas before switching to Premiere because my work was getting more VFX heavy and I used After Effects at the time. I quickly learned that once Adobe left CS6 and went CC, it was the most unstable editor I had ever used. After a few years of torture, I left everything Adobe behind (excepting Photoshop CS6) and now live happily in Avid land for cutting, Resolve for on-lining, and Nuke for VFX. You couldn't pay me to switch back to Adobe at this point, stability is more important than trendy features.

Syllabus

Course Intro
Software Setup
Intro To Nodes
Dealing with Log Footage
Background Birds
Sky Replacement
Gun Shots
Matte Painting
Driving with Greenscreen
Screen Replacement
Rig Removal
Digitally Enhanced Stunts
Explosion
Basic Workflow
Color Grading Tips
MoGraph Titles
Poster Design (Bonus Course)

"Depth of field, low contrast and a slow shutter speed are all that is needed"
No, you're missing the cadence that 24 fps provides. I used to be in the same camp as you, but I've since learned there is a stark difference between 24 and 30.

Just wanted to chime in here. I shot on a T2i for six years and just upgraded to the Ursa Mini 4K a year ago. It DOES have Global Shutter, which is incredible if you're doing lots of hand held and VFX work. I bought an entirely new kit when I got it and spent $5000 to get up and running: Camera body, 24-105mm, two 177wH V-mount batteries, V-mount plate, two 128GB cards, large camera bag, an Audio Technica mic, 12" XLR cable, 25' XLR cable.

I then had to purchase a new Glidecam as my HD2000 couldn't take the weight. So I got the DGSS Glidecam and a Cowboy Studio double arm vest.

I've done a few lowlight shots that were intended to be lowlight, so I lit them as such and didn't have a problem with noise or FPN. I personally feel it's the best "budget" cinema camera right now and really couldn't be happier with my setup or the image.

For the setup you're looking to fly, I'd say get the HD2000. The HD4000 will be a bit overkill.

I shot with a T2i for six years (and even bought a second one). I shot commercials, shorts, and even the first T2i feature back in the day. I lost both cameras in a house fire just over a year ago and found myself with about $5000 from friends to purchase new film gear (I wasn't insured, won't make that mistake again). I initially was looking at a something from Canon that could run Magic Lantern, or possible a C100, which I loved the image from. But then I got to thinking: It's 2016 and Canon hasn't updated their APS-C (Super 35mm) sensor in years. Is it worth the money today?

I took an honest look at the images I had gotten from the T2i and made a list of features I wanted in my new camera: At least 1080 24p, at least a super 35 sensor, more dynamic range than my Rebel, no moire or aliasing, and a global shutter. After much research, I bought the URSA Mini 4k and I couldn't be happier. I will always look back fondly on Canon DSLRs and what they did for me and the indie film industry, but today, there are better options than a DSLR when you're ready to graduate. I still feel that they make great cameras for the budding cinematographer, but for the working professional or indie filmmaker, look at the other options. Make a list of what's important to you and do your research.