I have never heard of stabilization described as "deshumanize and devitalize movement." Your eyes see pretty stable so it's not dehumanizing anything. The aesthetic consequence is less shaky cam footage. This sounds like the jargon I'd use to write papers in film school and get a semi-decent grade without actually saying anything.

I appreciate the review but out of curiosity, why is this a write up? The lack of actual video content you guys put out is really disappointing. A few second test shots when this drone has been out for weeks? For me, I'm a little annoyed the 10 bit is only in cropped mode (a much closer focal point), the cover for the gimbal scratches it and is a real pain to put on, it is really far from quiet, and you failed to mention the full obstacle avoidance is only available in intelligent flight modes. It's my first drone and I am having fun with it but it's not without flaws.

"Unacceptable footage" that's funny, I can only hope it's sarcasm.

So is this a bot or actual person who just copies articles/comments? I don't get the point.

The camera isn't out yet so you'll probably see a lot more stuff when it is. John Brawly is far from a weak cinematographer, were you expecting a horror film or something? These are camera tests and the one in the woods looks amazing and showcases the selling point of this camera, dynamic range.

Who is the "we" you keep mentioning?