Here are many examples you can learn of.
This is more a promo video for the coat hanger technique, than a good video: there is no story, no development, no more ideas than swinging a cam around your head in slow mo. The most subtle scene I found was that on the street an the long shadows, that was aesthetically very nice and had combined with the music a leger "free" spirit. Why the found not an independent swinger above their head in some scenes? Everything filmed with arm up is boring. After all: nice and cheap idea, that could infect more!
Regarding this article, I would like to pose a more general question, that is in my head for a long time and that is just in time before the Academy Awards are taking place: how to judge good editing (and give an Oscar for that ...), if you can't comprehend all the editing process from the very beginning to the very end? Unfortunately you don't see which frames are left out / put into the rubbish / preferred regarding to others takes / changed in chronology / are liked more from the editor than from the director. What you can actual see is: rhythm, perspective changes, preciseness, interplay with sound and music and so on. But the hidden and the past decisions you don't see. So: how does the committee work? Are they comparing the script with each scene? What further research do they do? I would be glad, if you could tell me more about this!