Agree with a lot of what you said.. I also do not like the Sony color palette on the higher end camera's and agree BM looks much better. But I think you made a mistake on the Ursa Mini. It will only do 60fps, The Ursa does 160fps. And the Mini as with BM camera's were meant to be lit. If they could get a little more low light, they would be amazing

Agreed. I know a guy that always says, if I had "that" camera I would be able to make really great work... As with accidents... sometimes it's the guy driving the car, not the car itself that is at fault........

Completely agree, Cinematically, I don't think it looks very expressive at all based on the trailer.

Sadly you may be right but in the end about BM and their foibles but to me, Sony looks like Video. ARRI, RED & BM and to a lesser degree Canon looks much more cinematic. For a corporate gig, its great. Wonderful. Has everything you need but I've yet to see any single clip that has a pleasing cinema look to it. Its like its too sharp or too perfect. I know people say its how it is graded but there are thousands of Sony clips in which I think look video-like and thousands of BMCC that look wonderful. Im not bashing you so don't take it that way, but to me, I would never buy one if I was shooting a film.

Sorry, every one has their

100% agree with you, Stephen. It DOES look like video. Personally people can have all the 4K they want and I will trade I for an extra stop or two of DR

Canon.. You are going the wrong way. Better Dynamic Range, Higher Bit and a Real Codec. The rest of it is a dime a dozen