"Neat Video offers more sophisticated controls... [but] it does take at least a few minutes to learn. ...[If] you need to buy a plugin right this very second to deliver a project that was due an hour ago, Denoiser III will get you results faster."
So you claim that Denoiser will get you faster results... But is only 2 minutes faster then Neat Video on your first time use AND costs more double the price of a single license of Neat Video? Maybe your statement would be more useful if you were to compare render times of the two, but you don't.
As someone who uses Neat Video on a quite regular basis, I love it, it's easy to use, and there's no good reason to get Denoiser III over it. This article appears to be nothing more then a sponsored post instead of a honest to goodness comparison aiming to providing actual advise. I like No Film School, but this article is a real shame.