Description image

'3:10 to Yuma' Screenwriter Derek Haas on the Importance of the Big Idea and Pacing in Screenplays

09.11.12 @ 8:38PM Tags : , , , ,

Two areas where beginning and aspiring screenwriters tend to stumble when putting together a screenplay are “the big idea” and pacing. For “the big idea,” this means, “Does this story need to be told as a movie and will it keep audiences engaged for 90-120 minutes?” Engaging the audience, however, starts on the page. Screenwriter Derek Haas (Wanted, 3:10 to Yuma, The Double) goes into more detail about the importance of the big idea and pacing in screenplays in the short video below.

Jump to the 1:53 mark to watch Haas talk about the big idea and pacing:

While the action genre — where Haas and his writing partner Michael Brandt tend to write — obviously lends itself to big ideas and requires swift pacing, all screenplays require big ideas and solid pacing. Haas quickly points out that big ideas don’t necessarily mean big budgets, either. Instead, big ideas launch good movies, regardless of budget. Also, as a screenwriter, you want need a reader to keep turning pages of your screenplay in rapid succession because the story propels them forward with energy and purpose. Readers need to see the movie as they turn pages, and if the script drags, the movie certainly will.

How do you determine if your idea is “big” enough to carry a movie? And how do you make sure your script has strong pacing? Share your techniques with us in the Comments.

Link: Derek Haas – The Secret to Smart Screenwriting, Big Think

Related Posts

  1. Good Screenplays Start with Great Endings (from John August & Craig Mazin)
  2. Read Scripts, Watch Movies, Write Pages: the Scott Myers 1,2,7,14 Formula
  3. How Amazon Studios is Trying to Get Free Options to Privately Submitted Screenplays

COMMENT POLICY

We’re all here for the same reason: to better ourselves as writers, directors, cinematographers, producers, photographers... whatever our creative pursuit. Criticism is valuable as long as it is constructive, but personal attacks are grounds for deletion; you don't have to agree with us to learn something. We’re all here to help each other, so thank you for adding to the conversation!

Description image 9 COMMENTS

  • Travis Jones on 09.11.12 @ 9:07PM

    Robert McKee’s book is one of the best. It breaks pacing down by genre. It’s only in hardcover but it’s worth the dough.

    • i agree; i’ve read many screenwriting books and if i was to choose 2 that would be Story and Syd’s Screenplay.

  • Billy_Dee_Williams on 09.11.12 @ 9:30PM

    If you’re starting out with your first screenplay(s), make sure your scenes are generally 2-3 minutes each, although some scenes can go as long as five minutes.

  • Well… it all depends on what kind of films we are talking about doesn’t it? If you are talking about american action films, then yeah, a “big” or high concept idea goes without saying.

    The 1975 “Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles” directed by Chantal Akerman is a film that slowly and repetitiously displays the mind numbing isolation of a house wife’s empty existence. Is that a “big” idea as you put it? No, but its still a fantastic and absorbing film.

    What is considered engaging and what isn’t, is highly subjective and depends on the audience and type of film.

  • One exception: A scene can be extended a tad is if you can get a laugh out of the audience.

    • Sorry bad comment. Barry Sonnenfeld disagrees:
      “If it’s not making the movie work, get rid of it. In fact, the single, funniest, best scene for pure comedy in Get Shorty is not in the movie and it’s a scene with Gene Hackman, John Travolta, and Ben Stiller. Ben Stiller plays a recent NYU graduate who’s directing a 10-Day-Wonder for Gene Hackman. It’s a really funny scene, but it didn’t work within the context of the pace of the movie in that section, and I had to get rid of it.”

  • You actually make it seem so easy along with your presentation
    but I find this matter to be actually something which I
    feel I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very
    extensive for me. I am having a look forward in your subsequent publish, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  • Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for information
    about this topic for a long time and yours is the greatest I’ve found ouut tll now.

    But, what about the conclusion? Are you sue about the supply?

LEAVE A COMMENT