November 27, 2018

Has 'Red Dead Redemption 2' Proven Video Games' Superiority Over Cinema?

'Red Dead Redemption 2' and the Coen Brothers latest effort tackle the same genre, and many similar themes, in very different ways.

If the fall of 2018 is any indication, whoever invented the term, "gone the way of the western", should be tracked down, hogtied and shot with a revolver. That's because two of the entertainment industries biggest plays this quarter have sought to resuscitate a genre that America just can't leave behind.

One of them is a video game from one of the most well-respected developers in the world, the other is an anthology film from a pair of the best-respected directors in the world. 

I'm talking of course of Rockstar's Red Dead Redemption 2 and the Coen Brothers The Ballad of Buster Scruggs and there may be no better case study for how far the potential of video games has come.

For years many have considered cinema to be among mankind's higher forms of art. They are collages of every artform that we as a species have invented before. Storytelling, melded with music, melded with sound, melded with picture to come together as the ultimate entertainment experience. One whose greatest artists have focused on one major objective: audience immersion.

It's only until recently that video games have provided a threat to that throne. Games like The Last of Us, Fallout and Zelda Breath of the Wild have shown us that storytelling has the ability to evolve even further. They remove the barrier of audience and screen hurtling the user into another world, where they are writing the story themselves. 

Red Dead Redemption 2 may have just put the final nail in the coffin.

"Red Dead Redemption 2" Credit: Rockstar Games

As Harold Goldberg from Vulture put it, "Game critics always call this 'being immersed,' but 'immersed' almost doesn’t do it justice. This world of Red Dead Redemption 2 feels so alive and real, you feel projected into it and then possessed by it. After a few hours, you can almost feel the ego diminution, the sense of  “merging with nature or the universe” that Michael Pollan describes in How to Change Your Mind. (And at $60 for a copy, Red Dead Redemption 2 is cheaper than psychedelic drugs.)"

After spending a little over a week with the game, I can heartily confirm these sentiments.

To that respect, The New York Times released an Op-Ed over the weekend simply titled, Red Dead Redemption is True Art, arguing that the game is, indeed a form of transcendent entertainment. "Instead of consuming a story, in a game you become part of it, choosing how it will unfold — even, in some cases, changing how it ends," writes Peter Suderman the managing editor of Reason.com. R

ed Dead Redemption 2 moves past musings of morality that you may get after watching a film, and physically forces you into "making choices and living with them..[it's] about taking responsibility for how you’ve lived."

"It is a vast four-dimensional mosaic in which the fourth dimension is time, in which the world unfolds around you, dependent on what you do.” 

This is a big jump from the video games that first made Rockstar famous. The Grand Theft Auto series started off from humble beginnings and was famously unconcerned with morality at any cost. The video game company is run by two brothers, Dan and Sam Houser, who emigrated from London to Manhattan and started their business in the late 90's. Rockstar’s last release, Grand Theft Auto V, which was made on a budget of $265 million, passed $6 billion in sales, making it the highest-grossing entertainment product in history. 

After its October release, Red Dead Redemption 2 earned $725 million in just three days, giving it the highest-grossing opening weekend of any entertainment product — ever.  The game's success is truly a testament to the company's work and as such, on its influence from film.

The Houser brothers often talk about the film directors that influence their stories, Scorsese, Malick and Oliver Stone, to name a few. The presence of the rich tapestry of Western mythology is felt throughout Red Dead Redemption 2's vast universe. There are so many iterations on the western, dating back to when the west was still... the west. And Red Dead Redeption 2 makes time to incorporate it all. 

There might be a town that reminds you of HBO's Deadwood (also coming back soon in theatrical form), there might be a moment that reminds you of a John Ford vista or a "side quest" that reminds you of The Unforgiven. There is space for it all. 

According to Vulture, "The final script RDR2's main story was about 2,000 pages. But if he were to include all the side missions and additional dialogue, and stack the pages, Dan estimates the pile 'would be eight feet high.'

Bringing the script to life meant 2,200 days of motion-capture work...requiring 1,200 actors, all SAG-AFTRA, 700 of them with dialogue." According to Dan, “We’re the biggest employers of actors in terms of numbers of anyone in New York, by miles.”  Even the actors recording non-playable characters had over 80 pages of dialogue each.

The finished game includes 300,000 animations, 500,000 lines of dialogue, and over 192 interactive mission scores. Borrowing all these aspects from film, the Houser brothers have created what they describe as "a vast four-dimensional mosaic in which the fourth dimension is time, in which the world unfolds around you, dependent on what you do.” That fourth dimension of time is what can truly push video games over the edge in terms of "artistic credibility."

"The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" Credit: Netflix

Now let's take a minute to look at Buster Scruggs, a movie that even with it's eye-popping color and metaphysical storytelling seems drab in comparison to the work of Rockstar Games. Once again using the New York Times as a reference, A.O. Scott wrote that the film "can be thought of as a Coen brothers concept album. It works just fine in sequence, but some tracks — the one with James Franco as a dumb bank robber, for instance — only need to be played once."

Others have shared a similarly divisive sentiment on the quality of short stories we see in the anthology film, each of which is ripe for comparison with a single mission in Red Dead Redemption 2. In both projects, each highlights a different aspect, or trope, of cinema concerning the Old West. With visual allusions to the greats like Sergio Leone and John Ford, they are both, at times stunning to behold. There are trappers and stagecoaches, freakish sideshows and prospectors, bank robberies and bar fights.

The real difference here is where the Coen Brothers had six short segments, Red Dead Redemption seemingly had several thousand, each arguably more compelling than anything we see in Buster Scruggs, barring perhaps the titular story itself. I enjoyed watching the film over the weekend, but I could feel myself eagerly anticipating its end so that I could get back to making my own stories in Red Dead Redemption 2.

It's true that RDR2 probably had a much more substantial budget and was in development for seven years, but we also have to consider that the Coens probably had a green light from Netflix to do whatever the hell they wanted and had plenty of resources at their disposal.

All of this is not to say that one form of art should be valued more than the art, only that we should be aware, as filmmakers and content creators, that video games have gotten to the level where they may be able to accomplish more in terms of relating to their viewers. It is a challenge that we can look at, and like any great artist, use to build our own craft in a way that more fully immerses our audience.     

Your Comment

9 Comments

"Has 'Red Dead Redemption 2' Proven Video Games' Superiority Over Cinema?"

Does the moral dilemma of writing an absurd click bait headline vs writing something that is true ever cross your mind?

November 27, 2018 at 1:14PM

7
Reply

I mean, I'm with you on being against click-bait but I don't think this title was necessarily that. It asked a question and then proceeded to discuss that question throughout the article in detail.

It may very well be superior...CURRENTLY. It made more money and is being consumed by a larger audience. What other metric do we have to go off of?

November 27, 2018 at 2:33PM

4
Reply
avatar
Luke Neumann
Cinematographer/Composer/Editor
2717

Aside from the fact that the headline implies that video games are superior to movies (it just hasn't been proven yet) it's also a false question. Apples & Oranges. Watching a movie is a passive experience. You're being told a story. Video games are an active experience. You are participating in the story. Neither is "superior" to the other because foundationally they are two very different experiences that are not in competition.

November 27, 2018 at 5:43PM

1
Reply

Half of Red Dead is slowly following some guy on a horse while he forcefully uses exposition to tell you a story you don't care about. The main story elements in the game are painfully cliche and the button mashing cut scenes come off as really cheesy so to answer the title, no, it definitely doesn't -but hey look! There's some cool looking mountains! (Owen Wilson voice) Wowww

November 27, 2018 at 6:52PM

0
Reply
avatar
Stephen Herron
Writer/Director
1587

There are VERY few instances in any game that can compare to the best movies, in regards to story, acting and plot. And I've been playing since the 70s. Plenty of games try really hard. Many are built on fantastic premises as well. But very few can actually wrap up a story properly.

And from my few hours in Red Dead, the presentation so far as been extremely well done...although westerns aren't my thing.

In recent memory the only thing that can even come close from an acting standpoint that has convinced me to be in any way emotionally connected to a character is Hell Blade. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sanPP6-pnY

also...Far Cry 3 did a good job of making it easy to hate this guy...in an action movie sort of way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKMMCPeiQoc

ICO also did a very good job for its time, with no dialogue. Most of the time I couldn't' give a crap what happens to my characters in games, usually because they're written so poorly or not animated well enough to make them convincing living things.

November 28, 2018 at 8:55AM

0
Reply
avatar
Josh.R
Motion Designer/Predator
938

Ever play the Mass Effect trilogy or Bioshock Infinite? I regard those as the gold standard in cinematic gaming.

November 30, 2018 at 7:59PM

0
Reply
avatar
Christopher Kou
Production Manager
218

"It's true that RDR2 probably had a much more substantial budget and was in development for seven years, but we also have to consider that the Coens probably had a green light from Netflix to do whatever the hell they wanted and had plenty of resources at their disposal."

You really think Netflix is gonna shell out $300 million for a pair of directors to tackle a Western anthology film? You're pitting a small-budget movie on a streaming service with a gargantuan-budget game, in both production value and marketing potential. Not a fair comparison at all when determining overall "superiority".

November 28, 2018 at 8:25PM, Edited November 28, 8:26PM

1
Reply

"And at $60 for a copy, Red Dead Redemption 2 is cheaper than psychedelic drugs.)" You're getting ripped off buddy!

November 30, 2018 at 1:09PM

1
Reply

BLA BLA BLA DOGS ARE BETTER THAN CATS, BLAH BLAH BLAH BECAUSE THEY ARE BETTER.

November 30, 2018 at 8:15PM

0
Reply