Description image

'Pull Back,' My RED SCARLET Test Short

01.12.12 @ 1:59PM Tags : , , , , , , , ,

I mentioned previously that I’d shot a micro-short to test out the RED SCARLET, and here it is. To put the camera through its paces, we wanted to use it in a real-world setting instead of shooting charts in a studio — but we also didn’t have the time or budget to put together a “real” short. What we set out to make (and what we ended up with) is something more than a series of test shots, and something less than a proper short. This was a no-budget, quick production on which everyone donated their time. Let me know what you think!

<embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300"></embed>

Here’s how it came together: I was at co-director (and guest-poster) Raafi Rivero’s office and saw that the building had a unique rooftop; I felt it would be a good setting in which to shoot some test footage (my SCARLET had recently arrived). The next day I sketched out a dialogue-free scenario on my phone and emailed DP Timur Civan, who had a SCARLET of his own on order, but had not yet received it. I emailed him, “I have a SCARLET and no lenses, and you have lenses and no SCARLET,” and so it was set. Timur brought his Cooke Panchro primes, I brought the SCARLET and some batteries, Raafi brought in actor Harlan Short, and we grabbed some shots on the Brooklyn roof for a few hours.

Ultimately, a project like this is about familiarizing yourself with workflows, getting in some on-set reps, and most of all finding collaborators to work with in the future. Editor Sasha Friedlander cut the short in Final Cut Pro (7) and then passed on an XML file, which I further tweaked in Premiere Pro CS5.5. Timur’s friend and collaborator Thomas Wong, a DIT and colorist, did the grade in DaVinci Resolve. Composer Milosz Jeziorski (also a guest-poster!) gave us a beautiful original piece of music to cut to.


We shot with all available light, didn’t use a bounce card, and didn’t have a light kit. For some of the interiors we moved a practical or replaced a bulb, but anything more would’ve been outside the scope of this test.

Since writing about infrared pollution on these sensitive digital sensors, I wanted to get ahold of some IRND filters but was unable to find any for rent on such short notice. So I settled for renting stock Tiffen ND filters (necessary to drop exposure while maintaining a somewhat shallow depth-of-field), which do indeed cause Harlan’s black leather jacket to look brownish-red in some scenes (in post, my quick fix was to have Thomas desaturate the blacks, which works better on some shots than others).

However, because the threads on the bottom of the RED are nonstandard spacing, Timur’s Zacuto baseplate wouldn’t work with it. So we couldn’t hook up a shoulder rig or matte box, which meant Timur had to use cloth tape to attach the 4X4.56″ ND filter to the lens:

Not fancy… but it worked. I’m planning on getting ahold of some Schneider Platinum IRND filters to see if they give better blacks when using ND filtration (note that despite this being a problem of far red light pollution, this is not a problem specific to RED — it affects most any camera with a sensitive digital sensor). Here’s another look at our fancy “matte box:”

The fact that the Zacuto plate wouldn’t work with RED’s base (Zacuto has new RED products on the way) also meant that, except for a few tripod shots, Timur had to handhold the camera without any support. Thanks for being a good sport, and thanks for not dropping it, Timur!

RED Problems/Bugs

No crashes or bugs to report on this shoot; the camera worked flawlessly.

The one thing I will say is that the touchscreen interface makes the camera much more user-friendly than a RED ONE. The menu system is intuitive for the most part and I think people will be able to get up and running very quickly (especially important for rentals). Timur, for example, had never touched a SCARLET but had it configured to his liking in no time (then again, Timur knows a lot of cameras). The resolution of the 5″ RED TOUCH monitor was also good (better than I thought, given it’s 800×480 and the similarly-sized SmallHD DP6 is 1280×800). However, the touch sensitivity is not on par with, say, an iPhone, and you’ll definitely “miss” a menu occasionally. The pulldowns (for file selection during playback, for example) are especially difficult — ACs may want a to keep a capacitive stylus handy if they don’t have a RED side handle or REDMOTE with which to control the menus. I’d also recommend some touch screen gloves if you’re going to be shooting in the cold. But I think the upside of having an intuitive interface far outweighs any touchscreen drawbacks — especially because, on a camera this small, it would be difficult to incorporate a control panel like the ALEXA’s.

Post Workflow

I sent a drive with all of the .R3D files to Sasha, who batch-exported them from REDCINE-X Pro into ProRes. She cut in Final Cut Pro and sent us rough cuts via Vimeo, which I then uploaded to Adobe’s CS Live so Raafi and I could leave time-specific comments. Sasha exported an XML file from Final Cut and I opened that in Premiere Pro CS5.5, relinking the ProRes files to the original 4K .R3D media. While doing some tweaks I found that Premiere Pro was able to edit the native .R3D files in real time at 1/4 resolution without using GPU acceleration (on account of my Hackintosh not properly recognizing my nVidia graphics card since upgrading to Lion — I’ll look into this when I have some time). 1/4 resolution of 4K is just as good as most “offline” editing workflows, with the benefit that you don’t have to go in and later swap in online files — you’re editing at lower resolution, and as soon as you pause it jumps up to 4K or 2K or whatever you have your paused resolution set to. If you’re editing RED footage, I think Premiere Pro is a great choice; more on the tight integration between REDCINE-X Pro and Premiere in a future post. Then Thomas opened the Premiere Pro timeline in Resolve and we color-corrected from there.

One of the obstacles we ran into was that the “zooms” in the short are in fact added in post. With a 4K file going out to 1080p you have an extreme amount of reframing to play with, and even if you’re doing a full 4K output, for cinemascope material you have a good amount of vertical padding (the SCARLET’s native aspect ratio is 1.9:1, which for a 2.39:1 output gives you about 20% of extra vertical resolution). I didn’t reframe many shots, but as we shot on primes and didn’t have a dolly, I added the zoom on the door (and Harlan) in post. This is not ideal — but since Resolve did not import the camera move, Thomas and I kept laughing at how awful the door sequence played without a push-in. It was definitely necessary, but I add to re-add them once I had the resolve output… which was fine since Thomas rendered out a ProRes 444 file without any output blanking (masking), so I still had the full 1.9:1 frame to work with.

The “story”

By never showing what’s below rooftop-level, and by witholding diegetic sound until the end, the idea of my script was to use audio to reveal that, as I put so eloquently to Harlan, “shit has gone wrong,” and that maybe this isn’t just your average rooftop in a tranquil city. The gunshots and sirens were a reveal, and it would’ve killed the vibe to show what was below Raafi’s office building:

Signs, stores, etc… they would take you right out of it. So even though there was no dialogue, hopefully what you don’t see — and what you don’t hear — makes this something more than a series of shots. I felt if we just went on the roof without guidelines we wouldn’t end up with a story — thus the script.

Image quality

I’ll post more thoughts in the days to come and will look for a good way to share some .R3Ds for anyone who wants to try their hand at grading them. With RED’s RAW workflow, you have a lot of latitude to dial in any look you want — this actually makes it hard to comment on this short’s look as a function of the camera, as you could take it in a vastly different direction if you wanted. I might do a pass of my own in REDCINE-X Pro to familiarize myself with the workflow as well. And while I haven’t mentioned the image quality of the SCARLET in this post, to sum it up I think it “looks like a movie” as opposed to video, and the 4K resolution and 16-bit RAW workflow is not marketing hype but has very real benefits. The main downside is the sensor is noisier than the latest Sony and Canon Super35 sensors (a problem that may be remedied in a year or two with the forthcoming Dragon sensor) and therefore the RED is less sensitive in low-light situations. It also means that 60 FPS at 2K is noisy — there are three slow-motion shots in the short, and the digital grain is definitely more pronounced in those shots. However due to better processing, reduced compression, or just a change in their color science, SCARLET/EPIC footage looks much better to my eye than RED ONE footage.

All of that said… a camera does not make good images on its own. It is about lighting and framing and staging. This was the first time any of us were working with the camera and I’m looking forward to shooting more in the years to come (including my first feature).

Thanks to the team

Thanks to Harlan, Raafi, Timur, Milosz, Sasha, and Thomas not only for making this good-looking and -sounding, but also for making this a fun experience!

One more thing…

We snuck a Canon 5D Mark II shot in there. Can you spot it?

UPDATE: if you want to know which one it is, see this comment. Many of you got it right!

[photos by Raafi Rivero]


We’re all here for the same reason: to better ourselves as writers, directors, cinematographers, producers, photographers... whatever our creative pursuit. Criticism is valuable as long as it is constructive, but personal attacks are grounds for deletion; you don't have to agree with us to learn something. We’re all here to help each other, so thank you for adding to the conversation!

Description image 125 COMMENTS

  • Koo, excellent job on this. At first I was very impressed with what I saw visually, then as things unfolded, what I heard lent a nice understanding to the overall concept. Awesome story and execution. Very well done.

  • I liked this a lot. The gunshots seemed a bit too “muffled” to me, but then again I don’t hear that much gunfire. I wasn’t sure if they were supposed to be gunshots at first, though. Is the 5D shot at 1:27? I wouldn’t have suspected any of them were not Scarlet if I didn’t know in advance.

    • Yeah, I just used gunfire from a sound effects CD… had we the time/budget for a proper sound designer that probably would’ve worked better.

  • Fantastic job, thank you for sharing! What a great team.

    Did you use the 5d on the ‘beard from below’ shot?

  • The branches against the blue sky shot in the beginning…is that the 5D shot?

  • I’ll send another “great job” your way. If this was merely a test Then I can’t wait for the feature!

  • I’m looking really hard for that 5d shot…very sneaky. 0:13 (grainy)? 1:27 (up on girders)? 1:53 (shakier)? Fooled me.

  • Thanks for this, Koo. I love the natural light look the Scarlet provides. Can you post links to your battery setup? Mostly everything I’m researching is out of stock. Thx

  • I like the sharpness of the images. The first teasers for this shot made me look at my economy and see if I could afford a scarlet,. But it soo much money, and I would be better of renting or attleast being able to get some business from it.

    Is the 5d shot at aroud the 2:00 mark?


  • One of my fears with this new equipment is an attack of artsy, film school shots that take away from the storytelling. It’s a very real concern, and a tough line to walk. No doubt the imagery is lovely. Thanks for putting this together.

  • Matthew Reynolds on 01.12.12 @ 3:22PM

    Nice work! I love it!

    I’m surprised the RED Fanboys and the RED Haters haven’t hit up the comments yet. Maybe they’re taking a break.

  • So I actually watched the short on mute by accident and I totally still got the “story” of it down. Reading the rest of the article and finding that there was indeed sound makes rewatching it a different experience.

    Great job guys!

  • Love the test, Koo. I’m going to be DPing a feature in a little less than a year and the idea of renting a Scarlet is appealing to me. I like your tests.

  • whoa! first time seein it, (im overseas on a shoot)…

    looks great dude! great job everyone!

  • I like the way the gunshot sounds slightly muffled, when contrasted with the siren it gives some extra depth to the audio, like the gunshots were further away, muffled by a building. Great work Ryan.

  • John Jeffreys on 01.12.12 @ 5:19PM

    i dont really like the aesthetic. its too “sharp” for my tastes, im used to the softness of dslr’s

    • You can DEFINITELY use something like a Soft FX 1/2 filter, or a ProMist to help take the edge off. Part of the fun of RED is that once you have the resolution of film, like a film work flow, all the aesthetic choices of filtration dont fully destroy a “softer” image.

  • Was the 5D shot the branches against the blue sky? That seemed sorta 5dish…

  • Wonderful test short. Shared on FB. I’m guessing the 5D shot is the cel phone CU inside the office.

    I absolutely love that wider shot of the office.

  • Nice work Koo! Lovely short! What I really liked where the lowlight scenes. Damn, that looks pretty awesome. Makes me wanna have it! But hey.. What do you want with a pair of those sick Cooke lenses.

  • Clayton Arnall on 01.12.12 @ 6:06PM

    The only problem with it is I need a part 2 to see what happens when that door opens at the end! The story actually grabbed me pretty good!

  • Nice footage. I didn’t get the story though. I was waiting for some sort of purpose for the hand washing and stress shots? The person through the door at the end lost me. I’m a story guy, and I got lost sorry…too much back story on the roof, with no purpose(?) and not enough connect the dots to resolve. I actually tried playing it backwards thinking…maybe ‘pullback’ meant I should pull the slider back. HAHAHA.

    Love the test and even more, the collaboration.

  • The shot at :12 looked like an oddball to me. Maybe the bloody hands and face shot at :59

    Nice test. Thanks.

  • Koo, what did you use for capturing sound on set?

  • Great images! Did you have to use any noise reduction at all?

  • Didn’t get the story. Just a lonely guy? A lot of effort for not much content. Of course I have only made one narative short, so take my input with a grain of salt. I wish I understood what is so special about the Scarlet the colors in eveything I have seen on the net seem so washed out and bland. I really think the video would have benifited if is was high contrast Black and White.

  • yes, more than ‘some test shots’. Loved it. Good choice of music.

  • Really enjoyed the short and interesting article as well. Nice to hear how you made it more than just a technical test.

    I liked the acting and feel you really got across that something had gone badly wrong for this guy and that he was only just holding it together. I would never have thought to leave out all the dialogue in something like that but definitely works and encourages you to try and get under the characters skin to understand him more.

    Hope you have some more of these in the pipeline and any chance you could post the script you wrote to see how you envisioned it up front?

  • Some takes had a real vintage, film looking feel. Really cool. Very well done.

  • Nice job, loved it! I look forward to shooting on a Scarlet once more rental houses start getting ahold I them.

  • Very nice! (p.s. 5D shot is the overhead shot when hes looking at the phone)

  • Great Job! Love the grain and shallow depth of field. My favorite part is the sharp contrast between the warmth of the office scene, and the cut to him on the cold cold roof. The color change alone is powerful. I’m guessing the 5D shot the one with the camera on his chest (27 seconds in) or the insert of the tree branches at the beginning (10 seconds in).

  • Lliam Worthington on 01.12.12 @ 9:43PM

    Great blog Koo.
    Timur did a great job handheld with no handles/support to speak of I thought.
    Did you do any stabilising in post?



  • Nice! Love how sharp it is, even at 720/1080… and the color is beautiful those office shots!

    btw, in the picture of your Resolve setup (or maybe Thomas’s?), how did you get the viewer to show up on a second monitor? Assuming it’s just a normal second display setup instead of a video monitor. I’ve been researching and keep reading it’s not possible… but maybe it is?

  • Koo, I salute you for providing a short instead of an unboxing and some uninspiring shot at different settings to show the camera off. I think the websites who do that are lazy asses. I also appreciate that you wrote the detail of how you got this together, how you pulled in a guy with lenses but without a camera (perfect!), and how you made your very elegant mattebox. But all in all, even with all this raw-ness you still ended up with a fantastic looking, well directed and structured short. Looks more like a teaser to amovoe to me. And I love how you used frames and sounds and not just suggestions to pull in the story rather than all visually showing everything like viewers are all dumb.

    The grading is fantastic! Id love to see more of these from you. You are the best camera reviewer yet man! Phillip Bloom just went to No.2 on my list.:D His christmas shootout is pretty awesome though.

    A little request, can you please do a short on the 60fps 2k slow mo? Id love to see it in good light, and you to showcase its capabilities when slowed down. Thanks.

    • Thanks Q! Glad you appreciate our storytelling efforts.

      Bloom does fantastically useful reviews, this is more of a test with some thoughts attached –I think they’re both useful!

  • So did you guys actually shoot with anamorphic lenses? Or did you crop in post?

  • 5D shot had to be the one underneath him as he was walking. Around 27 seconds?

  • Amazing, the shots look great and the short was so well done. I can’t wait for more!

  • Great job Koo, really like the feel of it. It’s a micro short but you’ve put some good work in to it. Just proves that Man Child is going to be great as well. 5D shot is the one in the office from aside. Keep up the great work

  • That was fantastic man! Really nice job. Had a really nice sense of atmosphere to it. I’d love to see some more shorts like this from you in future.

  • Nice one, i really like it! Looking forward to Man Child

    but will you tell us which shot is from the 5D? (the branches maybe?…)

  • Hi Koo, great short. the music really made it. Loved the grade outside and the stark contrast with the inside colours. I had a few questions as a keen student looking to rent a Scarlet/C300 come the summer for a my final film.

    For this film did you storyboard it or was it more a case of you knew exactly the content of the shots it was just finding a place on the roof for it to work. I would be really interested in knowing some more about how the conceptualised idea was different from the final product.

    Also when you say that you replaced some bulbs for the interiors (the one with the guy at his desk looking at his phone was my favourite part in the whole film) do you mean that you replaced them with a higher wattage?

    If my memory serves me correctly the native sensitivity is 800 ISO for the scarlet. Was all your film shot at this?

    Once again well done on making a great short!

    • Hey Archie,

      Glad you liked it!

      We shot the whole thing at 800 ISO, yes, but with a RED the ISO setting is just metadata — you can change it later. 800 is the sweet spot and if you do more or less you’re essentially just gaining up or down with the caveat that unlike with video, that decision is not baked-in. We used ND and tried to keep it well-exposed at 800.

      Raafi dropped in a green bulb in the bathroom scene, and moved some lights around for the office shot. I would’ve actually liked to have used a much lower wattage bulb in that wide scene because the desk lamp dominates the shot, it’s so bright. But we didn’t have the time or kit to do that.

      We did not storyboard (I’ve actually never storyboarded in my life, but I do do shotlists and for Man Child I will do some ‘boarding). To share how it changed from concept to execution, I’ll post my first script, and then a second script that I re-wrote based on what we shot so I could hand the latter to our editor (Sasha) so she would have a structure in mind for the cut.

      Hope that helps!

      • Koo this is brilliant. Thanks for the info. this site has been invaluable since I found it late last year.

    • There were also scenes / ideas that we created on the fly. It was always about having a post-apocalyptic vibe on the roof. The key to the flashback scenes — both the bathroom and the office — was to push into totally different emotional and visual territory. This helped Harlan, our actor, bring out more colors in the piece, and also allows the audience to fill in the gaps between: a) desolate roof b) bloody hands and c) flicking through photos in the office.

  • Great job on the video. It was very well done! However could you make a post about the workflow you and Thomas used for Premiere to DaVinci Resolve? I’ve red a lot about it and every article seemed to say that Resolve could not open Premiere XML files directly. All they gave were work arounds involving Final Cut Pro. A more efficient round trip tutorial would be really awesome compared to the work around. :D

    • Sure! Thomas output a Final Cut Pro XML file from Premiere Pro, we opened that in Resolve, and then he worked some sort of magic to get it to open (I’ll ask him to weigh in, because the first time it didn’t work).

      • what didn’t work was the linking to that single 5d shot :)

        had to do a few work arounds, and go back to the original source clip rather than the media managed clip and all was well.

    • just export final xml out of Premiere, and it takes it right into Resolve. You need CS5.5 at the latest updates though. Haven’t tried the round trip back yet, but should work all the same.

  • Great looking footage Koo. I’m glad Premiere worked well for you with the .R3D files. I’ve been happily cutting with Adobe for years despite my colleagues calling me crazy for not using FCP, and it’s nice to see a real-world example of CS5.5 handling footage far denser than my hacked GH2!

  • I believe Man Child is in good hands.

  • Koo! Aside from all the technical things…. this was a very interesting short story wise. Not bad for a rush job! I am a fan of “post apocalyptic” type scenarios. The Scarlet footage looks awesome as well…

    • Rev. Benjamin on 01.13.12 @ 1:38PM

      Word. Got to hand it to you man… I started watching bent on using my ‘camera test’ glasses, but I eventually got lost in the story. I caught myself thinking about the story a few times yesterday. And yes, the image looks great, very good sell for Scarlet. I’m strongly considering picking one of these up and tests like this don’t help my wallet!! Quick – somebody post something good shot on gh2!!

  • Brilliant! Mesmerising and breathtaking!

  • I’m liking the Scarlet more and more.
    I was thinking of buying the F3 soon but i’m liking this RED, even with it’s flaws.
    Does someone know if going to the US from Europe to buy the camera will actually cost less than having it go through Customs?

  • I understood the story even before you went into the office to see him with the photos….. VERY NICE WORK. The images are fantastic. I am a BIG fan of the site and still have my Hack running Tip-Top 10.6.8 Mind you…. Let us know as soon as you get the NVidia card up and running! I won’t go to lion until you do!


  • the sickest attachment of an nd filter ive ever seen, love it

  • quick question about the IRND’s that your looking at koo, would putting a clear IR filter in front of a normal ND producing similar results in color rendition in the blacks?

    I was looking at this set from filmtools

    • Too much glass. You want to combine as many as possible into one filter, every time the light passes through an Air to glass surface something is lost.

      The best idea is to rent a set of filters, ND to be specific, and go out side and see what ND’s you use most. For me its the .9ND and the 1.2ND. Then get IR in those strengths.

      Under interior lighting when light levels are lower, the visible spectrum and IR spectrum match in intensity so no IR is really needed. The issue outdoors is that ND cuts visible light, but not IR. So 4 stops if ND is knocking down visible light by a significant amount but still letting in tons of IR, its as if you’re “Overexposing” the sensor to IR light.

      • Thanks for the quick response,

        So when would you use both stages of a matte box?

        • My mattebox has three stages.

          138mm round stage, 2x 4×5.56 rotating.

          For example, Stage one will have a 1.2IRND, stage 2 will have a 1/8 Promist or 1/4 Ultra Con HD, and the 138mm Stage will have a polarizer in the correct orientation.

          IR and ND in one, Softening in another, and glare suppression/Reflections in the third.

          • Thanks Tim..
            I really respect and appreciate your cinematography.
            Quick question though:
            What brand 1.2 IRND do you have?
            Also what brand 138mmpolarizer do you have?

            My mattebox has three stages as well and I am looking to buy filters for it.

  • The branches in the beginning look 5d ish, a split second before the cut, I see banding in the sky, could be this online compression though.

    Too me, it looked different. If it is the 5d shot, no fair! Not enough info in the frame to see tell tale signs of 5d issues, lol.

    On the nosier shots, I don’t mind, reminded me of grain. I love the sharpness and detail overall of the piece, it is very finished. The interior wide shot was amazing.

  • Hey Koo, I thought the touchscreen interface was the same as using it with the RED ONE MX.

  • Nice work Koo et al, liked the narrative focus on the opening door.

  • The 5D shot is at 1:28 :)

    Thanks for the writeup mate….I’ll be getting mine this month I reckon :) Love your site as always!


    • Rev. Benjamin on 01.14.12 @ 6:48PM

      Matt, that makes perfect sense… I was thinking it was the chest-shot too, but yeah, getting up high on some rubble is probably going to be easier with a 5d2. Matches perfectly in my book! Very encouraging for dslr-ers, thanks for sneaking that in guys!

    • Correct! Raafi got a bunch of 5D shots, we used this one (1:28) because it looked good, and Timur and I weren’t particularly keen on having the RED go up on those girders. Some of the 5D shots held up better than others – overall the short would’ve looked quite different if the whole thing was shot on a 5D. But it’s a testament to the camera that it works as well as it does for the price!

      • McBlakewich on 01.15.12 @ 3:59AM

        Wouldn’t have guessed it. I think that says a lot. Either way…enjoyed it, buddy. Any thoughts on Damian Washington for “Man-Child”?

        • It’s simple really, just check the veil that is hanging to his right, you’ll see some aliasing.

    • What I loved about having the 5D as a B camera was the freedom to try “throwaway” shots like the one up on the girders. When I shoot my feature, I’m definitely deputizing a trusty young DSLR user to roll B Camera in particularly adverse locations.

  • Very nice looking piece, Koo. Makes me want a Scarlet of my own. Love the color, too.
    You’ve probably stated this somewhere else but, since you have actually got it up and running, what is the total $ amount you have in it? Without lenses, of course. And if I can ask another question, what fluid head are you using?

  • Looks so good!

  • nice little short, and of course it looks great too – have fun with your new expensive toy!

  • Beautiful. I can see why Cooke won the ‘budget’ PL lens set in the shootout you posted a few weeks ago, can’t wait to see Man-Child… will it have the same DP from this short?

  • I didn’t understand the short. Sorry.
    Could someone explain to me what happened?

    • I didn’t understand it at all when I first watched it but after showing my friend he explained it to me… because I’m deaf, I couldn’t hear the background sounds… “There’s some gnarly sounds in the background, like a war going on. It’s the future and shit has gone down,” was how my friend told me it. Suddenly understood it on my 2nd viewing, I love how it uses sounds as exposition as opposed cookie-cutter dialogue.

  • Koo, how long did your batteries last? How many did you use. Thanks

  • This is really great.

    Thanks for posting it Koo.
    I’m a GH2 user, but it’s inspiring me to get out there and shoot a short rather than wait for bigger plans to come together!

  • I watched it with no sound initially, and understood what it was about with no problems. I’m surprised some people are having such a difficult time ‘getting’ it.

  • good showcase. storywise, mhhh. i mean the whole future/war-theme is not really apparent at all to me(i actually thought that this is some homeless war-veteran remembering past fights. so the dude coming up the stairs and him being afraid made no sense at all). you could say this is a good thing, that the film has different meaning to different people, but filmmaking for me is all about leading the audience in the direction you want them to go(think).

  • I really liked the short and the story idea. Hope you don’t mind a couple of critiques:

    1. A bit odd the guy was collecting stuff, but never did anything useful with them.. make a fire, set a booby trap at the door, etc.

    2. Walking under the chin shot at 0:27 had too much slide; looked awkward.

    3. The guy shaking the Droid was a bit silly and made him seem too primitive for the story. He could have tried the power switch, received no power, and been done.

    4. Interesting that even when DaVinci Resolve is free it doesn’t mean that just anyone can use it. The exterior shots were washed out and just a blue cast was added. The color lacked a lot of depth and contrast that could have been there to make it even more immersive. Movie-like-shots yes, but movie-like-color… no.

    5. Ending door shot of the guy coming through was bit of a let down without showing a glimpse of the intruder with a weapon or something; didn’t seem threatening enough to spark much emotion.

    Despite these minor quips, overall a much nicer short than a lot of what I see. Well done! :)

  • Funny! Having lived in NYC for years, in the Columbia area, where the 1-9 is above ground, I thought that the guns were trains and of course the sirens also become unnoticeable after a few weeks of living there. I went back to watch again with the sound turned up a bit more and made the connection (sort of).

    Kudos to Harlan. Simple tasks and movements without dialogue are sometimes the hardest for actors. He brought some inner life that drew me in. I was curious about what was happening for him inside (when I thought the guns were trains I was more curious, after making the connection I was still interested in what had happend to him).

  • I like your post workflow Koo!
    LION is the devil! go back go back

  • Hey guys!
    I’m currently on the verge of ordering a SCARLET to Cape Town, South Africa. Now I’m struggling to get any information on how long I will have to wait for the camera. RED (of course) has no valid answer to my question. I would like to know if I should expect weeks, months or years to wait for. Does anybody know how long i might have to wait? any experience??? :)

  • Hey Koo,
    Great work! I’ll be ordering a Scarlet soon. Would you mind sharing which package you bought. Such as lens mount, batteries, media, monitor, all that good stuff. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

  • I don’t know if it’s just me or what but all red footage shot by, lets say, less professional people appears milky foggy washed out, no blacks as well as a bit blue-red cast. is it just me or what? Now the Hobbit looks great but it’s 3-D…….. so who knows?

  • must discuss this issue with some of your elreds regarding this matter as this is a serious matter is ur husband a porn addict? Who just wants to satisfy himself by this act only?And this is so disrespectful of him that u r virgin even after 2 years of ur marriage, u shud also consult any islamic scholars for dis as i knw they wud tell u to disolve this marriage and go for divorce as this is the biggest valid reason for u to take a step or tell him to give your physical rights, your problem reveals so many things he might have some pyshcological fears,y he has not given your physical rights uptil nowMaY Allah helps u