November 30, 2015

Lighting Like Vermeer: How to Create Cinematic Depth with Lighting

Even though we work in a 2-dimensional medium, there's nothing worse than having a 2-dimensional composition. Adding depth is crucial.

There are lots of ways you can add depth to your shot -- you can place objects in the foreground and background, use a shallow depth of field, or employ the parallax effect. But one technique you should know and use every time you shoot involves lighting -- particularly creating depth by using contrast.

This video by Jordy Vandeput explains the details of this lighting technique (it's more of a tenet really): how it works, how to light it, and how artists such as the great Vermeer used it in his own paintings.

In essence, this lighting technique seems simple enough -- use dimmer and brighter lights in opposing succession to create contrast (light/dark), however you'll soon find out, when handling such unwieldy things as lights, that it's true what they say: cinematography is basically painting with light -- and painting ain't no easy task.

And since we're on the topic of painting, the technique of using high contrast, or chiaroscuro lighting was very popular during the Baroque period (1600s) in which Vermeer, as well as my boy Caravaggio, were busy churning out the famed tronie Girl with a Pearl Earring and The Taking of Christ respectively. However, this type of lighting didn't have its day in film until the 40s with the rise of film noir. (Even though you could argue that it gained popularity in the 1920s during the German Expressionist movement.)

The Taking of Christ (Caravaggio, c. 1602))

The reason I really enjoyed this video is because I'm a huge history nerd -- if you mix film techniques with any amount of art history, I'll go cuckoo bananas. (All Jordy had to do was mention Vermeer's name.) Yes, it's great to learn how to light a scene to create depth, but it's also interesting to learn where the technique came from and how it was used (and how it evolved) throughout history.

How do you create depth in your compositions? What's your favorite Vermeer/Caravaggio painting? Let us know in the comments below.      

Your Comment

15 Comments

Constantly trying to re-create this old school chiaroscuro lighting in my work! Good to see it broken down to its core. Might have been clearer with a darker background though?

I used this lighting in one of my music videos through the use of a laptop screen (hid an LED next to it) as the key light, and a streetlamp outside (massive softbox on a giant stand) to create the fill and extra depth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbyoAUsbbhw#t=0m33s

December 1, 2015 at 5:45AM

0
Reply
avatar
J.Eiffel
Director/DOP/Editor @ Eiffel
83

Been trying to recreate this old school chiaroscuro technique with all my work recently. Good to see it broken down to it's core! Might have been clearer with a darker background though?

I tried to recreate the effect in this music video. I used a laptop screen (with a LED hidden next to it) for the key light, and a street lamp (softbox on a massive stand) as the fill to create extra depth.

You can see the setup at this timestamp:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbyoAUsbbhw#t=00m33s

December 1, 2015 at 6:00AM

2
Reply
avatar
J.Eiffel
Director/DOP/Editor @ Eiffel
83

That was actually interesting, it's good to see how easy a two light LED setup can change a scene from looking like a Primary school media production to a cinematic composition.
I'm a fan of "The Conversion of St Paul" by Caravaggio because it used the unique receding of colour (red bottom left, blacks top right) to add depth, which Would be good to take on in film.

December 1, 2015 at 6:43AM, Edited December 1, 6:51AM

0
Reply
avatar
Ben Thompson
DoP / Indie Film maker / Editor
67

This is lighting like Kenneth Vermeer, the Dutch goalkeeper who plays for Feyenoord... right?

December 1, 2015 at 1:17PM

0
Reply
avatar
Alex Richardson
Director
3273

Sorry, that was a bit negative... If you want something that looks more like the Vermeer, you need to look at the quality of the light.

Vermeer favours off-side 'north' lighting - it's soft light from a large, indirect light source (rather than direct sunlight, or in this case an LED panel 2 feet away). Bounce those LEDs into a large piece of foam core (for instance) or run them through some form of diffusion in a frame (or both - through the diffusion, then off the foam core) and you'll create a much larger, softer light source that will give you better modelling across the subject's face.

In the video, you've got an enormous amount of light coming from behind camera through the windows and filling in those shadows you want on the near side of the subject's face. The light is also bouncing off all the white walls in the room. Tape bin bags over the windows, and support this with negative fill - black foam core / black sheets / anything that can cut out reflected light, mounted on a stand near her face. This willl really deepen the shadows on that side of the face, and give you the look you're looking for.

None of these things are expensive or particularly difficult - if you're in a fix you can bounce the key off a wall, off newspapers, through some fabric - anything to make the source softer (and likewise come up with DIY solutions for the negative fill).

Rembrandt and Caravaggio - different again. Look at their paintings - Vermeer's lighting style is much softer, more graduated. Rembrandt favours light from behind/elevated (behind camera, in our case)...

December 1, 2015 at 7:11PM, Edited December 1, 7:11PM

0
Reply
avatar
Alex Richardson
Director
3273

*By 'behind' meaning behind the artist.

December 2, 2015 at 6:29AM

0
Reply
avatar
Alex Richardson
Director
3273

Hey Alex

I'm the creator of the video. I understand your comment and recieved more reactions like these. However, I'd like to talk a bit of my background. I host videos on Youtube for students, beginners and hobbists. All my videos cover very basic techniques.

The meaning behind this videos was to show my viewers that they can achieve bigger depth with one single light and explain them why it adds more depth.

Anyhow, I appreciate your comment and other critic comments. It's the first time my content was exposed to higher professionals and I've learned a lot from it. This gives me new insights on how to format and explain my content.

I believe Renée wrote a great article with the additional information.

Best,
Jordy

December 2, 2015 at 10:44AM, Edited December 2, 10:47AM

9
Reply
avatar
Jordy Vandeput
Youtuber
84

Jordy, I appreciate your desire to teach beginners and to keep it simple. I believe that the principles you were teaching were correct in theory. However, I have a simple suggestion (using one less light) that might improve the lighting setup that you were demonstrating and create more Vermeer like contrast. The window with plastic has a beautiful soft quality, it's just too flat on the subject's face and the white walls. Stretch and hang a large piece of opaque or mostly opaque material such as a dark bed sheet or black plastic between 2 light stands. On a pro set, duviteen cloth or B&W foam core would be hung using C stands. Ideally, the dimensions of this material should be close to the same size as the window. Next place the cloth parallel to the window and close to the subject as possible without entering the camera frame. Now, "hinge" the left stand back toward the window (counter-clock rotation) leaving the right stand in place. This will allow more window light to hit the subject on the camera left side of her face (her R side). You can adjust the desired amount of contrast on the camera R (her L) side of the face. You can achieve much better contrast modeling on the subject this way than adding a light that isn't very soft. You may need to increase the exposure slightly to compensate for some light loss. This is similar to Alex's suggestion. However, blocking light at the window itself may lose too much key light on the subject and be more difficult to fine adjust the level of contrast. When cutting soft light it's necessary to move flag away from the source. Bringing the giant flag closer to the subject will also create a very nice gradation on the back wall. The R side of the back wall will "fall off gradually become fairly dark. The L side of the wall will be darker than it was. It was a great idea to open up the door into the hallway to create more depth. But now that you have less light in the main room, you don't need to hit the hallway wall with direct light in order to get brighter contrast depth. Try aiming the light at the ceiling or bounce off the opposite wall for a more natural soft light pattern. The overall result will be more shades of gray and more true "chiaroscuro" alternating patterns. To achieve more contrast in any lighting situation, it's best to first consider where light can be removed - before adding a light.

December 3, 2015 at 9:54PM

0
Reply
avatar
Randolph Sellars
Director of Photography
286

What I see is that indie film edutainment is overdigesting it self. The originnal information that once came out from the actual industry pros is now retold and reinterpreted dozens of times by different people.

December 2, 2015 at 3:15PM, Edited December 2, 3:15PM

2
Reply
avatar
Einar Gabbassoff
D&CD at Frame One Studio
1107

Not only that, then don't actually put into practice what they are preaching!

December 2, 2015 at 6:01PM

0
Reply
avatar
Jonathon Sendall
Stories
1418

I get the impression that a lot of this is from students who need a presentation credit? Or just video blog types who need to raise their profile?

December 6, 2015 at 3:33AM, Edited December 6, 3:35AM

0
Reply

Good lord! Please don't use Vermeer unless you actually light something that equals his painting. Also do you have to present a lighting tutorial like a f****** kids programme. Try to treat people like adults.

December 2, 2015 at 5:08PM

0
Reply
avatar
Jonathon Sendall
Stories
1418

That's a pretty high bar that eliminates nearly everybody. I've been shooting for 35 years and I never achieved any image that I considered equal to Vermeer or Caravaggio. I'll give Jordy credit for getting the principle right - even if his execution could be improved.

December 3, 2015 at 10:17PM

0
Reply
avatar
Randolph Sellars
Director of Photography
286

That did not look like chiaroscuro at all. More like chiaroscuro shot flat :-p

The remark about the hallway in the background having the same exposure as the wall was also rather rediculous as it was a lot closer to black than the 'dark' wall. With the light in the hallway just looked nicer... and indeed reminded of the technique a lot of masters from the Dutch Golden Age used.

This is just a good example about how to use 1 light to make it look more professional. Not really a class in Vermeer lighting (Renée!); it is missing the follow up steps to make it so.

December 4, 2015 at 5:25PM, Edited December 4, 5:34PM

0
Reply
avatar
WalterBrokx
Director, DOP, Writer, Editor, Producer
9200

This video is the worst example of a cinematic light.

December 5, 2015 at 12:38PM

0
Reply
avatar
Norbert F
DOP
175