March 5, 2016

'Ghostbusters' Featurette Explains the Science Behind Proton Packs

For the past few days, the internet has been abuzz with the first trailer for the reboot to the Ghostbusters franchise.

When the trailer for the upcoming all-female reboot was released, then recut by film director Bevan Bell, both made the rounds of the internet so fast that almost no one noticed the "secret" featurette that appears on a website whose address is hidden inside a shot in the trailer. 

According to Slate: "Tucked inconspicuously into the trailer footage (at around the 1:05 mark) was a short shot of an equation-filled whiteboard. Appearing somewhat mysteriously atop it was a url: ParanormalStudiesLab.com." This website contains the video seen above, which contains an explanation by an actual scientist person, James Maxwell, senior postdoctoral associate at MIT’s Laboratory for Nuclear Science.

Apparently, when the film's director, Paul Feig, wanted to update the famous proton pack (the beam shooting, ghost catching device from the first two films), he turned to Maxwell, who used science to come up with a redesigned prop that could (in theory) function in the real world. 

Check it out, provided you are not afraid of any ghosts. Or easter eggs.      

Your Comment

12 Comments

So stupid humor...

March 7, 2016 at 7:50AM

4
Reply

Female main characters. Why?

March 7, 2016 at 11:16AM

0
Reply
avatar
JeffreyWalther
Steadicam Operator/Owner
1681

Why not? It's a reboot not a remake.

March 7, 2016 at 6:48PM

0
Reply
Mark Hinchey
Shooter
173

Because women are only funny to women. So Ghostbusters 2016 is a movie for women.

This is a kick into the face to all fans that have been waiting since the 1980s for a 3rd part.

March 8, 2016 at 11:57AM

0
Reply
avatar
JeffreyWalther
Steadicam Operator/Owner
1681

Women are only funny to women? Come on man, grow up.
This movie looks terrible for a whole host of reasons that far surpass the genders of those involved.

March 8, 2016 at 12:15PM

12
Reply

You are right.
It's terrible.... because of the actresses that are miscast.

March 8, 2016 at 2:42PM, Edited March 8, 2:42PM

0
Reply
avatar
JeffreyWalther
Steadicam Operator/Owner
1681

Or maybe it looks terrible because of the poorly written script (based on the jokes present in the trailer) and the way too cheesy graphics.
I think these women are each hillarious and incredibly talented. This movie just looks like an SNL skit (and not a good one) that is going to go on way too long.

March 10, 2016 at 11:57AM

7
Reply

Weren't the original Ghostbusters a bunch goofballs? What's with the scowls and aggressive stances...

March 7, 2016 at 11:55AM

4
Reply
Marc B
Shooter & Editor
685

Is this even worth commenting on.... What a pile of trash. Anyone who watches this should be deported.

March 7, 2016 at 2:53PM, Edited March 7, 2:53PM

6
Reply
avatar
Kaster Troy
Director, DP, Editor
1120

As with pretty my much all your work.

March 14, 2016 at 1:09AM

0
Reply
Aaron Miller
Boom-Poll Operator
82

I don't understand why the African American community still accepts negative stereotypes in film. I mean just on its face you have a white writer who creates a script and in the script has lines specifically for an African American character; lines that perpetuate a stereotype of what mainstream Americans views as your "everyday African American"....

March 7, 2016 at 3:31PM

0
Reply
avatar
Walter Wallace
Spokesperson/Entrepreneur
1142

Eh. Trying to bring back the zany comedy of black actors back in the 80s. Who knows. Plenty of movies today show the "normal" side of black characters.

March 14, 2016 at 1:11AM

0
Reply
Aaron Miller
Boom-Poll Operator
82