July 23, 2019

Here's Where Tarantino's 'Star Trek' Movie Takes Place

Quentin Tarantino is getting ready to boldly go to the Final Frontier with his new Star Trek movie.

What do you want to see in Tarantino's Trek? What would you do if you were making your first sci-fi studio blockbuster? 

Before you pitch your takes, it might be helpful to know just what the Once Upon a Time In Hollywood filmmaker's Trek has in store for the franchise -- and when it takes place. On a recent episode of the Happy Sad Confused podcast, the Oscar-winner (and big Star Trek fan) revealed some story details about the top-secret movie. 

“I don’t know how much I can say," Tarantino said. "The one thing I can say is it would deal with the Chris Pine timeline."

Setting the R-rated movie in the alternate reality where the last three Star Trek movies featuring Pine's Kirk and Zachary Quinto's Spock exist is both exciting for fans and, well, somewhat daunting for Tarantino himself.

The Kelvin timeline exists parallel-ish to the main Trek canon (hence why we can have two Spocks and one of them is the late Leonard Nimoy.) Star Trek director J.J. Abrams and his screenwriters helped shape the story for their 2009 blockbuster that way in an effort to not worry too much about staying within the lines of what was then nearly a half-century's worth of canonical storytelling. While that serviced Team Abrams, not so much for Tarantino. 

"Now, I still don’t quite understand [it], and JJ [Abrams] can’t explain it to me, and my editor has tried to explain it to me and I still don’t get it," Tarantino explained. "Something happened in the first movie that now kind of wiped the slate clean. I don’t buy that. I don’t like it. I don’t appreciate it. I don’t — f**k that."

Take note, filmmakers: When you have two Oscars on your shelf and classics like Pulp Fiction on your resume, you can say "eff that" to a studio's billion-dollar franchise's last three installments and shape the movie you want to tell within that sandbox.

"I want the whole series to have happened, it just hasn’t happened yet. No, Benedict Cumberbatch [...] is not Khan, alright? Khan (Ricardo Montalban) is Khan. And I told JJ, like, ‘I don’t understand this. I don’t like it.’ And then he was like, ‘Ignore it! Nobody likes it. I don’t understand it. Just do whatever you want. If you want it to happen the exact way it happens on the series, it can.’”

For a filmmaker like Abrams essentially giving Tarantino permission to wipe clean the slate Abrams helped make, and essentially reboot the rules of a universe full of characters that are still in play, is both refreshing and virtually unheard of in the current studio climate. The untitled Trek movie's script, with a draft by Mark Smith (The Revenant) that Tarantino will rewrite, has the unenviable task of recharging the series once again. Paramount is eager to mine Trek's franchiseability on the big screen, and they want the next chapter to perform better at the box office than 2016's Star Trek Beyond. While a hit with most fans and critics, the Justin Lin-helmed threequel grossed an underwhelming $343.5 million worldwide. 

If anyone can give the series an adrenaline shot to the heart (sorry not sorry), it's Tarantino. 

Once Upon a Time In Hollywood hits theaters everywhere Friday.      

Your Comment

6 Comments

Less woke would be a good start and lately Tarentino appears to have dislike for wokeness.

July 23, 2019 at 4:28PM

20
Reply
Simon Chan
Director of Photography
103

work work here man..

July 24, 2019 at 3:51AM

2
Reply
avatar
tata lindo
Investor Indonesia
8

Right now, I’ll delete the JJ Abrahams versions for not getting the point of what Star Trek is about it. And you can enclose the new series. Easy; Tarantino look at the the original version!

July 24, 2019 at 4:29AM

2
Reply
avatar
Javier Diez
Director/Writer
230

I'll reserve real judgement for a trailer if this actually gets off the ground.

but honestly this seems like a bad idea the way they are approaching it. If QT wants to do his own thing with the movie and this is essentially a reboot, why keep the cast? They are tied to the universe Abrams was building. If you are scrapping most of that then cast people you want to play the characters.

This whole thing just strikes me as odd.

July 24, 2019 at 10:01AM

0
Reply
Alex Everingham
Video Editor
727

First of all, thank you Quentin Tarantino for calling J.J. Abrams out on the fact that even if he was "rebooting" the series he essentially copied Khan without understanding/capturing the character.

I am glad that he is trying to repair the timeline, I just hope that it is entertaining and equally challenging when I watch it.

Honestly, I think Tarentino initially was not my first pick for Star Trek. But it really seems like he is passionate about the series... Which is something JJ never was. And he really could be the right person to move the series forward... once again.

July 24, 2019 at 1:01PM, Edited July 24, 1:01PM

3
Reply
Kyle Dockum
Videographer and Editor
1127

I like the idea of a re-boot back to the original series franchise. Perhaps Tarentino should watch the "Star Trek Continues" series on YouTube for a refresher on how to do good Trek.

August 3, 2019 at 4:07PM

2
Reply
avatar
Rick Shorrock
DP/Editor/Writer
94