'Battle of the Bokeh' Beauty Contest Blind-Tests Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Lenses

When considering lens options for purchase or rental, certain criteria may stand out to you more than others. This depends on what you shoot most often, or what a project demands. Perhaps as a run-and-gun doc shooter, you simply need the extra stop you get with one 85mm lens for the same price as another that doesn't vignette as badly. Or you gave up a contrast performance you really preferred in favor of the IS lens of greater overall value. But what if money were no object, and focal length and speed were matched? An aspect you'd find yourself evaluating closely is the way each handles its bokeh, or de-focused areas of the image. DigitalRev's latest Battle of the Bokeh is a comparison between Canon, Nikon, and Sigma 35mm f/1.4 lenses in precisely this spirit -- with some unexpected results.

Getting right to the video (via CanonWatch, video contains some NSFW language):

Aside from being very entertained, I was genuinely surprised what the lens community-voted as 'Best in Bokeh Show' -- especially since the Canon and Nikon cost $1350 and $1600 respectively, while the Sigma goes for $900. Granted, bokeh represents an aspect of optics that is a bit more subjective, rather than something more concrete and measurable like MTF performance. There's such a thing as 'good' and 'bad bokeh,' to the extent judging such a thing is possible -- but very few of your audience members will be detracting points for 'poor out of focus performance.' This is because bokeh, by definition, is the area out of focus (read: the part you're not supposed to be looking at), so it gets a bit more leeway than the other optical byproducts.

Still, though -- really? Sigma? Shame on me, I guess, for not watching the comparison with a completely open mind! (Let us know if you guys agree below). While we're on this bokeh-rific subject, there's plenty more viewing you may do on the subject from DigitalRev. Here's a few more of the offerings from Battle of the Bokeh, featuring the following lenses:

Were you guys surprised by the results of the first Battle at all? To what lengths have you gone to achieve superior or more-pleasing bokeh? Is sub-par de-focused performance a deal-breaker for you, or a less-than-vital consideration?

Link: Battle of the Bokeh - Canon, Nikon Sigma 35mm f/1.4 -- DigitalRev

[via CanonWatch]

Your Comment


I got the SLR Magic 50mm/T0.95 CINE, partly for the bokeh.

February 14, 2013 at 3:11PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM

Simon Falkentorp

I wasn't surprised at all at the results. The sigma is a much newer optical design and sigma seems to make lenses with good bokeh in general.

February 14, 2013 at 3:41PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


not surprised at all the sigma has got very good reviews:

February 14, 2013 at 5:32PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


Sigma lenses generally are very inexpensive because of poor auto focusing components (doesn't matter on most DSLRS that are manual) and they have moving parts that extend out of the body (you focus or zoom and the lens extends or retracts in length). For whatever reason I've noticed that my cheap poorly autofocusing sigmas always have superior bokeh to my Canon lenses and even my Tokina 11-16mm f 2.8, I think it must be from these internalized movements causing some sort of loss of bokeh quality on the higher end lenses. For instance my opening shots on my film trailer for "Full Metal Creeper" are shot with a 70-300 sigma with 4.6.-5.6f and people always assume I'm using an extremely expensive camera/lens (It was a T2i).


February 15, 2013 at 12:01AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


i get the fish-eye metaphor, but how does it relate to the/a theme?

February 16, 2013 at 5:07PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


I think that is how Samyang full manual lenses can be so cheap but sometimes have better quality than some Canon L's. A lot of money goes into AF and weather sealing with Canon L's, it seems

February 22, 2013 at 3:31AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


Seems that Sigma has currently optically superior 35mm design to other manufacturers http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/11/sigma-35mm-f1-4-arrives-announce...

February 15, 2013 at 1:28AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


You missed the samyang 35mm 1.4

February 15, 2013 at 8:38AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM

Pablo Saldana

I love my Sigma 50MM 1.4 lens. Got it in 2011 and have been in love with it since. I will buy Sigma again, unless there is absolutely something that a Canon lens will give that a Sigma simply can't...which right now I don't know what that might be. I mostly use my Sigma for my filming work as I like the blurred backgrounds when talking with my subjects.

February 21, 2013 at 1:51PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


I have a Sigma 18-50 f2.8 and a Tamron 17-50 f2.8 - actually I wanted to replace the Sigma with the Tamron because the Tamron is sharper and has better contrast. But then I found out that the Sigma looks much better when filming.
The Tamron is too punchy and sharp for the Eos 7Ds video, it makes all the problems like aliasing and moiree even more of a problem.

So now I kept the Sigma for filming and use the Tamron for still photography. Although when I need a nice bokeh more than sharpness and contrast, I might also use the Sigma for stills.

February 22, 2013 at 3:35AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


I know this if off topic but I'm looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I'm assuming having
a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I'm not very web savvy so I'm not 100%
positive. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated.

June 15, 2013 at 3:55PM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


Anheuser-Busch- This company has the Clydesdale horse as their spokesperson.
It is a no brainer since the customer does not need to purchase anything for you to earn money.
If you are thinking you may want to be one of those early bird shoppers this year,
you'll need to know what is on sale and where so that you can make your game plan.

July 28, 2013 at 8:11AM, Edited September 4, 8:21AM


Woah! I'm really loving the template/theme of this blog.
It's simple, yet effective. A lot of times it's hard to get that "perfect balance"
between usability and appearance. I must say you have done a amazing job with this.
Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Safari.
Excellent Blog!

February 8, 2014 at 10:44AM, Edited September 4, 8:45AM


It's appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it is
time to be happy. I've read this post and if I could I want to suggest
you few interesting things or advice. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
I wish to read more things about it!

February 8, 2014 at 11:06AM, Edited September 4, 8:45AM


Hey there! I know this is somewhat off topic
but I was wondering if you knew where I could get a captcha plugin for my comment form?
I'm using the same blog platform as yours and I'm having
trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!

February 27, 2014 at 8:25AM, Edited September 4, 8:45AM


Hello! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from
an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog?

I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast.
I'm thinking about making my own but I'm not sure where to begin.

Do you have any points or suggestions? Thanks

April 3, 2014 at 3:02AM, Edited September 4, 8:56AM


We really are handing out free product samples of world-class Belgium chocolates.
To be qualified to receive, quite simply respond to our comment together
with your address and we'll ship it out over the following business day.

May 16, 2014 at 12:35PM, Edited September 4, 8:56AM


What a material of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious know-how concerning unexpected emotions.

April 7, 2014 at 12:07AM, Edited September 4, 8:56AM


Hi there, just wanted to say, I liked this post. It was
inspiring. Keep on posting!

April 8, 2014 at 2:11AM, Edited September 4, 8:56AM