Roger Deakins and His Philosophy on Cinematography (And Why It Shouldn't Stand Out) | No Film School

Roger Deakins is widely known by many as one of the greatest living cinematographers. If you ask people what exactly makes a cinematographer great, you might hear that they create beautiful images. But as we should know, it's more than that.

Deakins wants us to know that "this is the problem with most cinematography," that beautifully filmed images that stand out on their own are not always the best choice to support the story.

Check out our video below for more.

“People confuse pretty with good cinematography. [The late cinematographer] Freddie Francis said there is good cinematography and bad cinematography, and then there’s the cinematography that’s right for the movie,” he said. “I often feel that if reviewers don’t mention your work, it’s probably better than if they do.”

Many of us who aspire to work in feature film cinematography pursue the dream of creating beautiful images, without thinking about why we’re creating them.

Deakins says that cinematography should never stand out on its own, and if it does, you have failed as a cinematographer. Judging “good cinematography” should then be more about how appropriately did the cinematographer use their tools, framing/composition, and lighting to deliver and make the story great?

What makes Deakins stand out as one of the best is because he has a habit of doing some of the following:

His cinematography is deeply motivated by the story
He adapts his style to the script
He uses extremely simple, yet effective camera and lighting work that is motivated by the story
He creates a sense of reality with his lighting, and the light is always motivated
He plans extremely well but also adapts accordingly
He thinks about how he wants the audience to feel with his cinematography and doesn’t try to stand out on his own

So the next time you're thinking about your shot, it may not need to be the most alluring to tell the story.

Do you have a favorite Deakins film or shot? Let us know in the comments below.

For more videos about filmmaking, be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel.

Roger Deakins cinematograper cinematography skyfall

What's the Hype With 'Interstellar' Revisiting Cinemas After a Decade in 70mm IMAX?

Here's Why You Need to Revisit 'Interstellar' in 70mm IMAX

Celebrate the love and hope at the center of Nolan's space epic in the format it was meant to be seen.

If we know anything about Christopher Nolan, he likes to go big. Nolan started with smaller-scale stories (as many of us do) with early noir adjacent works like Following, Memento, and Insomnia, then started going and staying big with his illusionist drama The Prestige. Since then, the scale has been various degrees of massive, with the biggest scope in his time-and-space sprawling epic, Interstellar.

While Interstellarmight not be everyone's favorite Nolan outing, there's no denying it's an impressive feat of filmmaking and his most emotional—if watching Matthew McConaughey's Cooper desperately try to reach his family through quantum space-time doesn't make you cry at least a little bit, what's going on, dude?

With Interstellar'sIMAX release, it's a great time to shed some tears in a public setting in one of the most prestigious film formats around. As we mentioned in our film gauge piece, Nolan loves shooting on film and utilizes 65mm intentionally to provoke a tone of massive scale. In that regard, Interstellar was made for 70mm IMAX. That goes without saying, dawg. That being said, other factors make Interstellar a perfect movie to revisit in theaters while you can.

Let's break down the release further below.

Keep ReadingShow less

Popular

Latest