Quentin Tarantino's Explanation of Harvey Weinstein's Crimes Is Incredibly Disappointing

Credit: YouTube
I want my favorite filmmakers to do better. 

To say that I am a Quentin Tarantino fan seems like an understatement. I've seen all his movies many times, read articles about him, and spent Monday listening to almost seven hours of podcast content about the guy released that morning.

I think Tarantino is one of our greatest living filmmakers. He's done more for Hollywood and American directors since anyone but probably Spielberg and Scorsese, and has become the voice of obsessed movie nerds everywhere. 

After rocketing into the spotlight as a writer, then director, Tarantino took over the film world, soaring to popularity and making movies that never missed. Behind many of his hits in the 90s and early 2000s was Harvey Weinstein, head of Miramax and then the Weinstein Company. He was a Hollywood mogul who was ubiquitous with screaming, cursing, and lewd behavior. 

Weinstein's crimes were cast off as eccentricities by his inner circle because he brought home gold statues and held a lot of power. But as his accusers found their voice in the #MeToo movement, and as more and more brave women came forward, much of Hollywood was forced to reconcile with the fact that they had been Frankenstein, and Harvey was their monster. 

Weinstein lost his court battle and was sent to prison. After that, the roaring waters stopped surging, and Hollywood was left calmer in his absence, though no one really had a come to Jesus conversation about what they did to let Weinstein get to such a place where he thought he was invincible. 

When Tarantino spoke on the subject in the New York Times in 2017, he said was "shocked and appalled."

While I don't think anyone should be held accountable for what Weinstein did behind closed doors, many people had to become introspective about what it meant working with him and making sure he held onto power. And we need to see what level of facilitation Weinsten received to damage and abuse these people for so long. If there were accomplices, they should be rooted out. 

But aside from the people who made it directly happen, we also have to come to terms with the people who heard things and brushed them aside. 

Tarantino admittedly was one of those people. He brought his projects to Weinstein over and over again. They were an inseparable duo when it came to making movies. So naturally, people wanted to know who knew what.

But that topic wore off as a talking point as Tarantino released another masterpiece movie, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, an eerily prescient tale that talked about the hopes and dreams of Hollywood icons who never quite got their time in the spotlight and would be remembered for tragedy. Tarantino used that movie to rewrite history and see these people shine. It was a stunning look at Hollywood stardom. While set in 1969, the movie could easily have been set today. And about the careers Weinstein neutered behind closed doors when sexual favors were not granted, and advances were brushed away, instead of about Charles Manson. 

All this brings us to a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience that Tarantino appeared on to promote the novelization of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. While in the interview chair, Rogan did something few had done since Tarantino spoke with the New York Times. He pressed him on his relationship with Weinstein and what happened. 

You can watch what Tarantino said below. 

For those of you who skipped the clip, I'll recap briefly.

Tarantino told Rogan that "everybody" knew about Weinstein's behavior, and referred to him as a "fucked-up father figure." He continued, "I wish I had done more" to intervene. "I wish I had talked to the guy," and "I wish I had sat him down and had the uncomfortable conversation."

For clarification, Tarantino said, "I didn't know about any rapes or anything like that... I chalked it up to the boss chasing the secretary around the desk. He was making unwanted advances. That's how I looked at it."

Finally, Tarantino said, "I wish I had sat him down and gone, 'Harvey, you can't do this, you're gonna fuck up everything,'" and "I don't think anybody talked to him about it."

In a moment of self absolution, Tarantino added, "everybody who was in his orbit knew about it," claiming they "probably" were unaware of "anything about rapes... but they had heard things."

There's a lot to unpack here, and I'm sure I won't be the most eloquent person to write about this issue. But I felt like we couldn't have a website about Hollywood careers and tips without addressing it. 

Tarantino is one of my favorite filmmakers, but he missed the mark here. The reason people like Weinstein were able to grasp so much power in Hollywood was not their taste, or because people liked them, it was because they were able to operate on fear. There was a genuine fear that you could end your career or end your publication if you crossed him. 

This fear was allowed to build because the culture made it okay for a Hollywood type to be the person "chasing a secretary around a desk." That's still a problem, but it was part of the internalized casting couch lore of old Hollywood. But it's not okay for anyone to do that. We've known that for a long time. And yet, it was called old school. 

Things should not have to become full-on sexual assaults for people to say something. If Hollywood is going to atone for its sins and people will regret doing nothing, they need to stop pushing aside the fact that they didn't know something heinous was going on. They just knew something a little bad. 

There are no excuses for either kind of behavior. 

Another thing I wish Tarantino said was something about the survivors. His entire conversation was framed in a way where he could have saved and stopped Harvey, the producer who gave him his dreams. In the heat of the moment, maybe he wasn't thinking, but fuck Weinstein. The people who needed someone like Tarantino to help were Weinstein's victims. 

I don't want Tarantino to change the past, but I can say that as men in Hollywood, the onus is on us to create the change and to have those conversations. Tarantino could have made movies with anyone else in the industry, if he knew Weinstein was a bad guy, he didn't have to go back.  When you have power, like Tarantino eventually achieved, you have to make sure that power is put to good use. You have to be willing to go the extra mile to foster a safe and inclusive environment for those around you. Not just use that power to get the final cut on your movies. 

The only way Hollywood can get better is to not only reckon with the past but to demand tangible change in the future. That's the statement I want to hear, not on some little blog on the internet, but from my favorite filmmakers. I want to hear them come out and say what they can do now, not what they didn't do then. And then I want to see them do it. 

We talk a lot on here about "show, don't tell."

So show me something.      

You Might Also Like

Your Comment


A little off-topic from the GREAT heart of this post, but with all the talk about the future of Hollywood and how it can change makes me really glad that a lot of things are moving away from Hollywood.

Hollywood will always be around to do cool stuff for the Tarantinos and Marvels of the world, but I feel like me (and probably most of the people who visit this site) long for a day where more independent filmmaking reigns supreme and Hollywood isn't the end all be all of success.

Tarantino is one of the very greats and I feel that no one here isn't striving to be a fraction of how good he is. But if we think realistically about our futures as narrative filmmakers I feel there are an overwhelming amount of people that are realizing it would be just as, if not more, fulfilling to be, say, a Jim Cummings -esque figure in today's filmmaking world than a modern-day Tarantino. And THAT change is what makes me excited about the future.

A future where Hollywood and money in the 8-9 digit range doesn't dictate everything, and independent filmmaking becomes cheaper, easier, with quality only as limited as your know-how. A future where the "market" bends to whatever we want to make, because that will be their only choice, and filmmakers won't need power-hoarding Harvey's at all to get it done and seen.

A pipe dream? Probably... more than likely... but it sure feels good to think about :)

July 2, 2021 at 11:00PM, Edited July 2, 11:00PM


Sorry, not sorry I agree with tarantino.

July 3, 2021 at 3:31AM

heinrich weber
jack of all trades

I know the author means well, but Tarantino has said in no uncertain terms that it was wrong and he wished he would’ve done something about it, even though the true extent of Weinstein’s actions (rape vs. unwanted advances) were unknown. What else can he say or do regarding a past event? Should he have brought a whip and flagellated himself in front of Rogan? Also, you mention men should’ve done more, but what about the women who knew and did exactly what Tarantino did? Everybody is a hero in their own minds, but I’m sure the author would’ve done exactly what Tarantino and everybody else did: nothing.

July 3, 2021 at 11:50AM


Ian McKellen said about MeToo that women of hollywood knew about Weinstein and should be the ones to change their behavior implying they knew what he was like but still went to him to get favours. While there is absolutely possible there are actresses who genuinely approach Weiinstein professionally and then sexually abused by him, what gives this man such unfettered privilege to demand sexual favours if there is not a significant number of women who is enabling such behaviour to begin with that allow him the confident to keep doing it.
HM the Queen met Weinstein, would she be resonsible for doing more at least avoid meeting him. I'm not convince nobody advising the Royal Family did not know about his behaviour.

July 4, 2021 at 4:41AM

Simon Chan
Director of Photography

ItS NoT tHe RaPiSts FaUlT

ItS ThE WoMeN WhO GaVe ThEiR BoDiEs to HiM AnD EnCoUrAGEd HiM

July 4, 2021 at 4:47AM


That's taboo and the twisted individuals that run these movements consider them victims as well. Go figure, a woman opens her legs to get ahead and it's the guys fault. Should she get pregnant that's on the man as well. The statement always being the same man bad, woman innocent. It's her body she cannot be held accountable for what she does with it, That sir is your fault now shut up and go sit in the corner or we will dog pile you. Let them live in their delusional world and surround yourself with better people there are plenty of women that don't think like them to share your life with is the way I see it. I could not imagine having to listen to one of those airbags go on selfishly about all the wrongs done to them and any man that would get involved with one deserves it when their victimization turns to him.

July 7, 2021 at 12:19AM


I totally agree with Tarantino.

July 5, 2021 at 4:29AM

Jessica Morgan
Marketing manager

This article is kind of stupid. You realize that Tarantino saying that is much more than many other people have said or done. Where are your articles on Meryl Streep or Nicole Kidman or Danny Boyle or Anthony Minghella or all the other people he worked with who have said or done even less? Articles like this are why people don't say anything and you're basically proving that the best thing for Tarantino would have been to just say nothing at all.

July 5, 2021 at 2:32PM


It's understandable for Tarantino to have a loyalty to Weinstein, but there is now way he didn't know what he was really all about after dating Mira Sorvino. The unspoken creeps in the Weinstein, Moonves, Cosby, Lauer, Rose, etc. affairs were those at the top who could have fired them or at least stopped working with instead of covering for them. These were orchestrated conspiracies' of silence that the highest levels entertainment industry were complicit in.

August 9, 2021 at 1:34PM, Edited August 9, 1:35PM

Marc B
Shooter & Editor