Description image

Sony's New $600 NEX-5N Hybrid Camera Put to the Test

09.6.11 @ 9:16AM Tags : , , , , , ,

In addition to the A77, A65, NEX-7 and NEX-VG20, Sony will also soon be shipping the $600 NEX-5N, a diminutive, low-cost hybrid camera with an APS-C sensor. Despite the lack of a mirror (thus making the NEX-5N not a DSLR, technically), this camera should be capable of the same shallow depth-of-field images that have popularized HDSLRs, and a few sites have gotten their hands on it for testing purposes. Note that some of these videos follow the standard tradeshow practice of camera manufacturers: bring in female models to a predominantly male world in order to show “skin tones.” I’m not judging, just saying. To the tests:

Here’s a comparison from EOSHD comparing the NEX-5N to the Panasonic GH2; the GH2 is certainly sharper, but then again my 5D Mark II loses to the GH2 in sharpness as well (EOSHD’s Andrew Reid calls the NEX-5N’s resolution “better than Canon,” though I still find plenty to like about Canon DSLRs, any relative lack of resolution notwithstanding). The vid:


The NEX-5N is a $600 camera, and there are some limitations beyond image quality: first of all, there’s no external microphone, so you’ve got to go separate system sound with it. Also, there’s no hot shoe on the camera, so you’ll need a rig of some sort if you want to attach anything (like a sound recorder… ). However, the NEX-5N does apparently offer an unscaled mini-HDMI output. In another test, Jared Abrams at Wide Open Camera tests the NEX-5N with some Contax-mount Zeiss lenses:

Finally, EOSHD discovered that, while the AVCHD 2.0 codec performs less than admirably under duress, there’s a setting on the NEX-5N designed specifically to minimize banding. Strange, but helpful. Video evidence:

See the full review below at EOSHD for more details.

Link: Sony Nex 5N Camera Test Video/Review – EOSHD

Related Posts

  1. The Sony F3 Put to the Test: 12+ Stops of Dynamic Range and a Bit of Aliasing
  2. Is the $1,000 Panasonic GH2 a Better Camera Than the $5,000 Panasonic AF100?

COMMENT POLICY

We’re all here for the same reason: to better ourselves as writers, directors, cinematographers, producers, photographers... whatever our creative pursuit. Criticism is valuable as long as it is constructive, but personal attacks are grounds for deletion; you don't have to agree with us to learn something. We’re all here to help each other, so thank you for adding to the conversation!

Description image 4 COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT