Here's a little trivia fact I had no idea existed until today when I saw the trailer for the new Running Man movie, which absolutely slapped.

Did you know that both the 1987 dystopian action film starring Arnold Schwarzenegger and its remake, starring Glen Powell, are based on a novel of the same name by Stephen King?

I had no clue, and here's why: the book was published in 1982 under the pseudonym Richard Bachman, a pen name King used for a handful of his earlier, darker, and more cynical works.

The use of a pseudonym was a way for the prolific author to publish more than one book a year without over-saturating the market with his own name.

Man, I wish I were that prolific.

Well, today, I want to pull apart the differences between the book and the movies.

Let's dive in.

  - YouTubewww.youtube.com


Key Differences Between the Novel and the Film

When you really sit here and think about the plot of The Running Man, it does sound very Stephen King. Nevertheless, it's wild to learn he wrote the book.

And I can't believe in the 80s, when King was famous, they didn't advertise the original movie that way.

There are some key differences between the original movie and the book, and we can pick up from the trailer for the new movie that it may be more like the book.

While the film shares its title and basic premise with the novel, the two are vastly different in plot, tone, and characterization.

The Protagonist 

In King's novel, Ben Richards is a desperate, emaciated man living in a polluted, totalitarian America of 2025. His motivation for entering the deadly game show, "The Running Man," is to provide money for his critically ill young daughter. He is an ordinary man forced into extraordinary and brutal circumstances, relying on his wits to survive.

That's the basic story in the Glen Powell trailer, but way different than the Ben Richards portrayed by Schwarzenegger. He's a former police helicopter pilot framed for a massacre he refused to carry out. So he is forced to be in the game. His motivation is primarily to clear his name and expose the corrupt government, a stark contrast to the novel's desperate everyman.


  - YouTubewww.youtube.com

The Game Show

The televised competition itself is also radically different. In the novel, "The Running Man" is a month-long, globe-trotting manhunt. Richards is given a head start and must evade "Hunters" sent to kill him, all while being a public enemy who can be turned in by any citizen for a reward. The world is his arena.

That also is the plot of the Powell movie, but in Arnold's version, the movie condenses the game into a few hours within a massive, controlled television studio divided into gladiatorial zones. Richards and other contestants face a series of flamboyant, wrestling-style "Stalkers," each with a gimmick, like the chainsaw-wielding Buzzsaw and the electricity-shooting Dynamo.

I can see why they cut it down in the original movie to create a time lock and amp up the tension, but I also like a bigger world where anyone can kill the participant.

The Tone

King's novel is a bleak and suspenseful thriller with a deeply pessimistic view of society and media. The ending is famously dark, with Richards, having learned of his family's murder, hijacks a plane and flies it into the Games Network skyscraper in a final act of suicidal defiance.

I doubt the Powell version ends that way.

The 1987 film, on the other hand, is a quintessential 80s action movie, complete with one-liners, over-the-top violence, and a more hopeful, crowd-pleasing finale where Richards not only survives but also exposes the lies of the network, leading to a popular uprising and a triumphant finale where he gets the girl and defeats the villainous game show host, Damon Killian.

Summing It All Up

It's interesting to see that the upcoming version is reportedly a more faithful adaptation of King's original novel, but I do love the Schwarzenegger movie and think it made key concessions to become a huge action hit of the time.

All in all, it was fun to learn that this was all based on King's ideas, and made me want to revisit some of his other hidden novels.

Let me know what you think in the comments.